|
|
Current  user Comments for "More Than Just Canada: Microsoft Debating World-Wide MCSE Name Change"
|
| 6/20/01 - Bill D says: |
How about MSCCFP for Member of the Microsoft Cash Cow Feeding Program. |
| 6/20/01 - Nayyar Farooq says: |
Either it will be called an engineer or expert, it will not make any difference in the expertise of the person who attained MCSE. A student who spends 4 four years to complete his/her engineering degree compared to a person who do not have hands on experience and passes all the tests to get MSCE does make a difference. Nayyar Farooq, MCSE, CCNA, NET+ |
| 6/20/01 - Simon Troost says: |
My suggestion is: Microsoft Certified Enterprise Support Engineer (MCP) Enterprise Support Systems Architect (MCSE) Enterprise Support Solutions Architect (MCSD) Enterprise Support Expert (MCSE+MCSD) Because that's what we're supposed to do with the new certifications. |
| 6/20/01 - Mitch Scher says: |
I think it would be a bad idea to make any changes at this juncture. The acronym has been established and is recognized by both computer and non-computer entities. To change would be to create confusion........something we can live without. MCSE - Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer is just fine. I am sure there are more important fish to fry. |
| 6/20/01 - Randy North says: |
Leave it be. Name recognition is important and there have already been enough changes in the Microsoft certification program that we don't need anymore. |
| 6/20/01 - Michael Jameson says: |
To go from "Engineer" to "Expert" is obviously to devalue the certification. Engineer is active. Implied are designing, building, maintaining. Expert is passive. An expert purportedly knows a lot about something. What is done with that knowledge is another question. Engineer has many positive connotations, associated with great and necessary public and private works, serious study, professionalism. Expert has many negative connotations. The adjectives "self-proclaimed" and "highly paid" ("overpaid"?) spring to mind. Expert today, gone tomorrow. Redmond should not tinker with the title. |
| 6/20/01 - Sean F says: |
I believe there should be some name change to differntiate MCSEs with the Windows NT 4.0 track and the Windows 2000 track |
| 6/20/01 - Jeff P says: |
Mike Jameson really affected my opionion of the term 'expert'. He's right, engineer has many more positive connotations than expert, HOWEVER-Engineer is a protected term and techincally , it breaks the law in some places (or at least leaves one open to litigation issues...) . Here's my suggestion. Microsoft Systems Architect. (do they have domination of that term)??? |
| 6/20/01 - F. Sigmund Topor says: |
M.C.S.EXPLORER will do just fine. It will encourage Microsoft to to be proud of the Explorer in Windows, else just use EXPERT. Sigmund Topor |
| 6/20/01 - F. Sigmund Topor says: |
M.C.S.EXPLORER will do just fine. For one thing the word EXPLORER is better than the word EXPLOSIVES, moreover Microsoft already has the EXPLORER anyways, so Y not just use it? ELSE just use EXPERT instead of EXECUTIONER for it reminds one of the Blue Screen of death. I hate death. Sigmund Topor |
| 6/20/01 - Nawar Aljanabi says: |
I think should be Expert and they should make a difference between the NT and W2K one. |
| 6/21/01 - Darrin Emmerton says: |
I think Microsoft should change their certification name to Microsoft Certified Systems Extinct. Cause that's where MSCE's are heading, to extinction. Get Linux certified instead |
| 6/21/01 - Asim Shah says: |
I thing it make no difference in the expertise of the person who attained MCSE. Asim Adil Shah MCSE , CCNA |
| 6/21/01 - Greg Horner, MCP, Net+, A+ says: |
It would be interesting to know how many of the respondents who are ok with the change have actually passed the Win2k certification tests. I have two more design tests to complete and have found this certification to be hard earned. Just a note of Hx; I have a BS in CS, AS in Business and eight years IT experience. The Engineer term should stay. Expert does not do it justice. |
| 6/21/01 - Tiredofthe Microsoftbs says: |
Microsoft will do whatever they want. They don't care about our views. They are GOD after all. |
| 6/21/01 - Roberto Boclin says: |
it Would be very easy with, MCITS(Infrastructure technology Specialist) and MCDBS(DataBase Specialist) |
| 6/21/01 - Lance Goss, MCSE, CCNA says: |
Let's see, NT 4.0, W2k, XP, MCSE, MCP, Engineer, Expert, ETC. Does anyone else feel like we're chasing our tails. Leave it alone! |
| 6/21/01 - Kevin K says: |
How does "Expert" make it any less? CCIE is Expert..and there's no way in hell you can even consider comparing the MCSE to CCIE..The fact is that they're going to change it because of the legal issues coming from using "Engineer". It doesn't mean the person knows any less or the cert is any more/less valuable...although its hard for it to be any less. |
|
Display Page: 01 02 03 04
|
-B.N