CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Register today for a Free Sponsored Tech Library Webcast and you could WIN! Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Tuesday: December 28, 2010


New Microsoft Sim Exams Still Not Available at Many Prometric Testing Centers


4/13/2005 -- It appears that many candidates still cannot register for Microsoft's 70-290 and 70-291 exams, featuring the new simulation questions, at their local Prometric center.

The exams, which are the first to include the new question format from Microsoft, were not available at Prometric centers when they went live on March 31. Several candidates reported last week that they were told that the exams would not be available until the end of the month, or that they would only be available in the pre-simulation format.

The exams have been available at Pearson Vue testing centers, except Japan, since launch.

A spokesperson for Prometric told CertCities.com late last week that the exams, in simulation format, would become available for registration yesterday, April 12, worldwide. While a check of Prometric's online registration system revealed that the exams do appear to be available in some locations, other locations -- including a Prometric-owned testing in the Los Angeles area -- still do not allow candidates to schedule the exams. In a check of 40 random testing centers in California, only 16 allowed registration for the exams.

When this reporter called Prometric's phone registration system to register, we were told that the exam was "available but not downloaded at many locations," and that we would "need to contact Microsoft" to find out when the exams would become available.

The spokesperson from Prometric did not respond to our multiple requests for comment on the reasons behind the initial delay, and did not respond for comment on the current sporadic availability by press time.

Al Valvano, group product manager for the Microsoft Learning Group, told CertCities.com today that the exams have been released to all testing providers.

According to Valvano, the company was aware of the delay in release of the exams through Vue in Japan and of the delayed rollout of the exams through the Prometric network through yesterday. He said that both relate to ensuring the quality of the exam delivery with the new simulation software is high: "The technical side is done ... we're finishing quality assurance."

Valvano said Microsoft was not aware that the exams were not currently available for registration in all Prometric testing locations as of today. He said that while he can't comment on availability at the local testing level, he said that he would assume the delays are so that Prometric "can ensure the best possible test delivery experience for its customers."

Valvano recommended that any candidates whose preferred testing center is not currently offering the exams should work with that testing center directly to arrange an exam appointment if they prefer not to go to an alternate center.

Microsoft said on its Web site that it plans to introduce the new question types into its 70-293: Planning and Maintaining a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Network Infrastructure and 70-294: Planning, Implementing, and Maintaining a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Active Directory Infrastructure exams in June.

Prometric's online registration system is available at www.2test.com. Pearson Vue's online registration system is at www.vue.com.

CertCities.com will bring you more on this story as information becomes available.  -Becky Nagel



There are 17 CertCities.com user Comments for “New Microsoft Sim Exams Still Not Available at Many Prometric Testing Centers”
Page 1 of 2
4/13/05: mrobinson52 from Florida says: I would have to agree with the above suggestions. Prometric does not share much of the fees with the testing centers, and does not make an effort to assure the quality of the testing centers. I switched to Vue some years ago because of the poor quality of the Prometric testing centers in Silicon Valley, where I lived at the time.
4/14/05: Kurt Hudson from Tempe, AZ says: The simulation exams suck! Be glad if you don't get them. Here is why they suck: 1. The interface does not work like the real interface. I have been working with Microsoft products since the early '90s. I already have my MCSE in 3.51, 4.0, 2000, 2003 and then some. I took the 70-290 just to see how it worked and it didn't work well. I passed by a good margin, but I was still disappointed that I coudn't click some buttons that should have been clickable to complete tasks. 2. I've had colleagues tell me they couldn't complete some of the objectives they were told to complete in the simulations for the same reason. Stuff didn't work correctly. Several of those people failed. These collegues are network administrators for medium sized networks and have been doing this stuff for quite a while. I asked them if it was because they were asked to perform things they didn't know how to do and they replied "No! It was because the damn simulator wouldn't work." Some even reported getting VB errors when the simulation broke during the test. They had to reset the simuation in order to complete the question. 3. I know for a fact that some utilities just don't work and these are the utilities that you would typically use to perform the requested activities. On some questions I was forced to use slower methods of completing the task because they expected me to do it a specific way - instead of the way most people would probably do it (i.e. the most efficient way). Clearly the people who designed the simuation weren't very good administrators themselves. 4. I have seen better simulators as part of the "extras" in books that I have purchased. That is pretty sad when Microsoft cannot afford a decent simulator. Overall, this whole situation is frustrating and disappointing. I have two main issues: 1. People I know should be certified have failed the exam because they couldn't complete the simuations. 2. The simulations don't accurately reflect a typical operating environment, so how could they possibly be helping the value of the certification? The only thing passing the exam proves now is that you were either lucky or you learned to work the simulator, which is not like the real interface. That is BS and I am not talking about Bachelor of Science.
4/14/05: Jim P. from SW Ohio says: I just recently took the old 70-291 at a Thompson. It blew. They had the screen resolution at 800X600 while the test was clearly designed for 1024x780 (or better). I was in scrolling hell. I couldn't read a long paragraph without scrolling. It was hard to see the inline exhibits. I failed the test in part because it was hard to grasp the setup and see the answer at the same time. Thompson needs to get a grip.
4/15/05: pennino from Rome, Italy says: In Italy, as of today (April 15th), I wasn't able to schedule the 70-291 anywhere in Rome at Prometric Testing Centers. The exam is available on the web site (same thing for 70-290) but no local center allows you to schedule it!
4/15/05: Ashik from Sydney says: I am yet to take the exam and now after all these horrible experience I would prefer MS do the test on their LAB 1000 time and make a good cooperation with Prometric. Is this the reason I heard few people calling MS exams are bit odd at time. GOD knows what would be when the full pace simulataion starts.
4/15/05: Anonymous from Georgia says: It's interesting that they are going ahead and making it live instead of offering the exams as beta exams or even as a refresh exam like they did in 2003 for the 70-210 exam.
4/17/05: Anonymous from Washington says: I took the 70-290 test with VUE, On the first test I almost passed my score was 15 points from passing, After reading the above posts I recognized now that I may have experienced a flawed simulator. Example: On one the questions it was dealing with nested groups but for the life of me the way Know to nest groups would not work as though I did not know what I was doing so, now you got me thinking that it just was not working correctly hmmmm......I had to blow the question this one would have hopefully put me over the top and on another simulator like someone said the options I would choose to meet the simulator goals did not work! Why not? I do not know now and find this very dishartening. On the second exam my machine went into a VB error and shut down right after one of the simulators this is very distracting also and though the test was less simulator than the first I actually did worse (3 simulations as aposed to 10 on the first test) but on the second test I got a simulator and could not get some functions to work again, however, I know enough about the 2003 OS to find my way out of a potentially failed simulator hmmmm..... (maybe I did what I was supposed to do I do not know now) Did I get bombed? I do not know the answer to this but I guess I failed 2 tests and will just have to continue to learn 2003 tricks and stray away from 2000 server knowledge. And besides the Questions do not always give you enough real world or strait forward questions I have even noticed mispellings in the tests. Well Back to study.....Maybe I will pass this time.
4/17/05: Kurt Hudson from Tempe, AZ says: I want to be clear, even though I complain in my earlier posting, I still think Microsoft has THE BEST testing team and strategy available. I really like the hands-on testing idea. I am just saying that the implementation is flawed and needs to be fixed. The questions aren't the problem, it is the way the interface works.
4/18/05: S3 says: I would just like to tell everyone to think twice before wasting your money taking the 290 or 291 exam. You may have been an admin for the last 5 years and read every book out there but the sims are so messed up I give you about a 15% chance of passing. I personally experienced VBscript errors in almost every simulation question on my test. My 291 test completely blew up in fact I had to leave the testing center because they were not able to recover the first half of my exam. When you would perform a task in the sim sometimes you would have to reset the sim just so that you could get a button to work. You would click the button three times, reset the question get back in and then it would work. Sometimes when you changed stuff you would go back in to make sure that the changes took and they would be back at the default again. You were only able to do things a cetain way and if you did them a different way you had points knocked off. Found that out after the test. If the end product is the same and my way is quicker than yours wouldnt my way be the best way to do that as an administrator who has a lot of work to do. The funniest thing is the response I got back from Microsoft about the simulations. They claim that even though people are having troubles all over the US that this is all appearantly the fault of the testing center where I took my test. With a product that has so many flaws I don't know why I even expected to have a certification test that worked correctly. Perhaps maybe they'll release a service pack for the exam that fixes everything except for what they'll fix in SP2-5. haha
4/18/05: Anonymous from washington says: Kurt I aggree with the Flawed Theory! I would like to say I did not pass because I apparently need more practice, if I truly had a disfunctional sim question I would have passed the exam if it worked (I will never know), Oh well I just need to keep studing because if I truely knew alot about server 2003 features I could have blown the sim and still walked out with that exam completed. I like the Idea of the SIMS I hope they become 75% sim exams just as long as they truely do work, I staggered on this site and wanted to input the fact that its not just a prometric problem VUE has em too!
First Page   Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “New Microsoft Sim Exams Still Not Available at Many Prometric Testing Centers”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top