CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Visit CertCities.com Forums and Ost Your Mind Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Tuesday: December 28, 2010


Keppel Attorney Blasts MS Claim of Losses; Says Client Should Not Face Jail


1/30/2003 -- Robert Keppel's defense attorney, Michelle Burrows of Portland, Ore.-based Kolher and Burrows P.C., today provided CertCities.com with a copy of a sentencing memo she filed with the court asking that her client not be sentenced to jail or be forced to pay millions in restitution to Microsoft.

Keppel pleaded guilty in August to a felony charge of theft of trade secrets in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1832(a)(2), part of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. The charges stemmed from the sale of Microsoft certification exam questions through Keppel's Web sites, Cheet-Sheets.com and CheetSheets.com. It is the first known successful criminal prosecution of a "braindump" site owner in the IT certification industry.

On Tuesday, CertCities.com reported that the prosecuting attorney is asking the judge to sentence Keppel to 18 months in prison. Keppel is scheduled to be sentenced tomorrow at 9 a.m.

According to Burrows, Microsoft is also asking for $1.9 million in restitution. Burrows is asking the court to keep the restitution at $200,000 -- the amount in assets that Keppel estimates he has already forfeited -- and also allow Keppel to receive alternative sentencing, such as work release or probation.

The base factor for sentencing in these cases is the estimated loss to the victim, which is the starting point for federal sentencing guideline calculations. In her recommendation, Burrows asks the judge to "depart downward" from the calculated sentence, arguing, among other things, that even the $500,000 to $800,000 loss value settled on in the plea agreement is too high.

She also argues that there is no support for the government's allegation that, "...when companies hire people who have obtained MCSE and MCSD certificates by cheating, but who, in fact, cannot install and maintain the systems correctly because they have neither the experience nor expertise in the Microsoft products commensurate with the certificates, those companies tend to blame the Microsoft product and become reluctant to buy other products."

The defense's 38-page motion acknowledges that Keppel knowingly used some actual exam question in the materials he sold, but "the majority of even the 'corrupted' tests were still largely Mr. Keppel's own work product," Burrows alleges, adding, " The test comparison completed by Microsoft demonstrates that most of Mr. Keppel's practice exams had very little similar or exact material contained within them. In fact, some tests were not even similar in any portion."

She also argues that the calculation of loss is inaccurate because: " Most of the tests which Mr. Keppel is accused of stealing are now obsolete -- within one year of the accusation. Microsoft was not expecting to make any more profit from these obsolete tests anyway, and it is quite speculative for Microsoft to now argue 'losses' from retired, obsolete and useless tests, " she wrote.

Elsewhere she stated "...Defendant has not received any specific data or information which support any losses for Microsoft. They did continue to use the tests."

Burrows also argues that Microsoft benefits from the "cheat" industry, because "good or bad, Mr. Keppel -- together with a very aggressive and competitive practice exam market -- provided a greater sense of confidence and likelihood that Microsoft's tests were passable. In an ironic twist, the 'practice exam industry' actually enhances Microsoft's profits by increasing the size of its audience of potential test takers..."

Burrows also stated that the FBI agent who calculated to the total revenue Keppel earned from his criminal actions did not take into account earnings from products that were original to Keppel, and also did not consider charge-backs or refunds, both of which resulted in an overstating Keppel's earnings. The defense further stated that it did not trust calculations presented to the court by the FBI agent because he is now a Microsoft employee.

By the defense's calculations, Keppel's profits from stolen exam questions, exact and similar, totaled apx. $150,000. "Defendants argue that the value of the seized and forfeited assets is sufficient to more that adequately compensate Microsoft for the costs of any infringement by Mr. Keppel..." Burrows wrote.

The defense memo names Shabazz Mian, based in Pakistan, as the person who provided Keppel and other Web sites with actual exam questions. In the memo, Keppel's attorney made note of the defendant's cooperation with the FBI in its investigation of Mian. (Burrows states that the FBI has since dropped the investigation of Mian, but that Keppel is continuing to cooperate with investigators.)

In the memo, Burrows accuses Microsoft of "shopping" prosecutions of similar Web sites to other prosecutors, but she claims that most decline because they say these types of cases are civil matters.

According to Burrows, she received notification yesterday that Microsoft is seeking 1.9 million in restitution from Keppel.

One spokesperson for Microsoft told CertCities.com that the company will not comment on any aspects of the case until after the sentencing hearing, but did say that, in general, when it comes to braindumps, the point has nothing to do with money. " Beyond Microsoft, even Cisco and CompTIA...the whole point is that this industry we work in must have validity to exist," the source said. "The end result is that you have people, and what's at stakes is their careers, their lives, their ability to feed their kids. That's the real impact of an issue like this."

At Keppel's sentencing hearing tomorrow, the judge will consider both this sentence recommendation, the one filed by the prosecutors and one prepared by the probation office. CertCities.com will report the results of the sentencing hearing as soon as they are announced. We are also attempting to reach Shabazz Mian for comment, but have not been able to locate him as of press time.  - B.N.



There are 25 CertCities.com user Comments for “Keppel Attorney Blasts MS Claim of Losses; Says Client Should Not Face Jail”
Page 1 of 3
1/30/03: Matt from Denver, CO says: Are Microsoft's 1.9 Million in estimated losses a result of the estimated number of people who did not have to retest because they nailed it first try? I'm not advocate of people who simply memorized questions and passed a test with no knowledge, but Microsoft's estimated losses seem more than a little high to me. Like the article says, financially one would think they made out better because of these places. Besides, even though Microsoft products have known holes, most companies have little choice but to go with their products. Not untill open source develops into the beast it has the potential to.
1/30/03: krinsh from WV says: If you read the "government's" claim carefully it almost sounds like MicroSoft is blaming its own certification program on the public's dissatisfaction with MicroSoft products.
1/30/03: Anonymous says: I think Microsoft is trying to make an example out of this guy. If Keppel gets the jail time and the 1.9 million dollar find then maybe some of these companies will stop selling braindumps. I know it will be almost impossible to stop cheating altogether I hope Mircosoft, Cisco, COMPTIA,etc... tries to take other braindump sites down as well.
1/31/03: Anonymous says: Let's look at the costs of the development of a certification as stated by an article written by Daivd Foster in the Jan. 03 issue of certification magazine. A new certification test: $35,000, one new test question= $350.00, confidence in test results- priceless. One other comment- you cannot refer to a braindump as a Microsoft product. The product was not created by Microsoft. And Believe me, Microsoft, CISCO and CompTIA are not just sitting and watching.
1/31/03: Anonymous says: What do you call Transcender, Self-Test Software, TestKing? Aren't they braindumps with the only difference being you have to pay for them instead of getting the free information off of xxxbraindumps.com or xxxdumpcentral.com? Why doesn't Microsoft develop a larger pool of questions and interactive questions to test a person's real knowledge?
1/31/03: Cheaters go to Jail from Not in Jail says: Hey Annonymous. Are you daft? Comparing Transcender and Self Test to Test King and other Cheat sites and brain dumps is like comparing consensual sex with rape...it ain't even in the same ballpark. Self Test and others spend time, resources and money to develop materials based on published test sponsor guidelines. Brain dumps and cheat sites steal the information, whether from screen prints or someone memorizing the questions and answers and then regurgitating the information. And Test King? Seems to me I heard they got their info from some Pakistani outfit. Could that be the same Shabbaz character? Funny how that works, considering that I've heard other IT people say their stuff is exactly the same as the exams. So while you plug away at Microsoft and their inherent greed as you see it, you absolve the others of there crimes? No, that just makes you a whiner and complainer who hasn't the cajones to do more than post your resume on Dice and Monster, or are unwilling to take a job that pays less than your own percieved value. Shame on you and others of your ilk. Go to Africa, or North Korea, or Afghanistan, where mothers grieve daily about how to feed their children the most basic of diets while fending off roving rape gangs who justify their actions as making good on their offended honor. Go to the poverty stricken areas of our own country, talk to the people who work their butts off in what many would consider demeaning jobs for minimum wage to put food on the table and eak out a meager living because they have the PRIDE of self sufficience. You and people like you are the scourge of our society, not Microsoft. You just find it easier to blame others for your misfortunes instead of pointing the finger at the true culprit...yourself. Go somewhere else and cry and moan, because here it just shows you for the pitiful creature you are.
1/31/03: Anonymous says: Any test questions or testing software such as Transcender and Self-Test is the same as a braindump no matter where they get their questions. To make them more legitimate they would have to also provide study materials and practices that you can learn from.
1/31/03: Anonymous says: Shabazz Mian is the guy who sells testking material, who certcities cannot locate ay press time, but whose money bought the sponsored link you see at the bottom of this page. How convenient! Oh c'mon.. don;t edit this message cos i can prove what im saying here beyond a doubt to certcities.
1/31/03: Matt from Denver, CO says: I agree wholew heartedly with Cheaters go to Jail. Especially Transcender. I've seen the software, and those questions were not actual exam questions. They simply test your skills on the product. It was not meant to be a learning tool as much as it was an evaluation tool. The only way you can call those items Braindumps is to refer to what braindumps were originally meant to be, a legitimate information exchange. Not a way to get away with piracy and fraud.
2/1/03: Bill from Dallas,TX says: i got testking in May , and I took the microsoft exam in December more than 30% of the questions were in my testking .Microsoft should change the exam every week or add a new part of exam like Cisco which will be lab.
First Page   Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “Keppel Attorney Blasts MS Claim of Losses; Says Client Should Not Face Jail”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top