CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Listen, See, Win! Register for a Free Tech Library Webcast Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Columns ..Column Story Saturday: April 5, 2014


 Certification Advisor  
Greg Neilson
Greg Neilson


 Certification Ethics 101
Two exam preparation shortcuts that true IT professionals should avoid at all costs.
by Greg Neilson  
9/12/2001 -- It wasn't that long ago that certification exam preparation products didn't exist at all. You either took the vendor class, or you knew the material anyhow and took your chances with the exam.

Since then, certification has become a huge boon to technical book publishing -- a myriad of test preparation tools keep springing up. In most cases, we pay the money for these products to shorten the time taken to prepare for the exams and also to improve the chances of passing that exam. However, there's a couple of shortcut approaches I would advise you not to take.

The first shortcut I feel you need to make a decision NOT to use are braindump Web sites. The word "braindump" has a variety of meanings, but in this context it means someone has written down the test questions they experienced together with their suggested answers. Sometimes these can be quite organized with a number of test takers putting their thoughts together, resulting in a fairly large pool of questions for each.

To put it simply, braindumps are cheating. I guess some people rationalize this away by declaring that certification exams often ask about obscure product features; but, at the end of the day, by using these resources you are cheating yourself and also everyone else who has or wants to hold that certification. We've seen a model for this with Microsoft's NT 4.0 MCSE exams. Unfortunately there is now a common perception that braindump sites have been used all too often by participants, so it is often felt that the certification itself is not worth as much as it used to. There have been many steps taken by Microsoft to reduce the effectiveness of these sites for Windows 2000 exams, but undoubtably some devious people will eventually find ways to get around this.

Another area that concerns me is that so many test participants seem to view Transcender exam preparation software as freeware. (This happens with other products as well, but I see it most often with Transcender.) I must say that I don't use Transcender's products myself, and I don't have any stock in their company, but these are licensed products and I feel that they should be treated as such. People who wouldn't dream of using pirate operating systems or office suites seem to have no qualms about swapping pirate versions of Transcender's offerings. I've heard people say that these products are useful exam preparation tools, and I'm assuming that people justify the piracy because of the high price of the products, but that's a pretty poor reason. A few years ago I used to get many unsolicited e-mails from people wanting me to share pirate copies of Transcender (although I'd never bought any!), but now I think people are more suspect about making this piracy known. With the completed certification in hand, we have the intention of showing the world that we're capable IT professionals (stress on the word "professional") and not pirates.

Please give some thought to your ethical situation as you prepare for your exams. You may not agree with my opinions here, but it's a good idea to at least make up your own mind on where you stand on these issues. What do you think: Am I too idealistic, or are there other areas you think need to be avoided in order to ethically prepare for exams? Let me know by posting your thoughts below.


Greg Neilson, MCSE+Internet, MCNE, PCLP, is a Contributing Editor for Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine and a manager at a large IT services firm in Australia. He's the author of Lotus Domino Administration in a Nutshell (O'Reilly and Associates, ISBN 1-56592-717-6). You can reach him at Attn: Greg.

 


More articles by Greg Neilson:

-- advertisement --


There are 75 CertCities.com user Comments for “Certification Ethics 101”
Page 1 of 8
9/12/01: Kevin says: Greg, I've been preaching this for a long time! I was one of those NT 4.0 MCSEs that took all the exams with miminal "preparation" -- I relied on my real world experience. I wish would-be MCSE's would realize that they're only hurting themselves (and all the other MCSEs out there) by doing these things. Thanks for speaking up about this!
9/13/01: Henry says: unconfirmed ..but i heard that transceder and others ...have people take these tests and come back with memorized q and a's ...just like a brain dump ...transcenders are legal and touted as the best but if a group of individuals gets together and does this for free...its bad? ...for who? transcender maybe...i hold a cert and want it to mean the most it can ....so i am torn on this matter... but people putting thier efforts in (for free)is no different than transceders for money...i do hope that anyone not knowing WHY the answers are right or wrong..and just memorizing them do indeed fail ...but i feel these can be used as a learning tool...if used properly (not memorization)
9/13/01: Jack says: With certs changing as we change cloths daily, I will look for every advantage - brain dumps, transcenders and most importantly REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE. Until Microsoft gets their act together I will continue to operate status quo. And by the way, I am an Adjunct Professor at a local community college who teaches MCSE courses.
9/13/01: John Q. says: I am an MCT as well as MCSE, and I can tell you that if Microsoft took the effort to put the material into its classes that it does into testing the "obscure features" of its products, there would be no need for the cheats. Microsoft, however, feels that the tests should reflect expertise in real world experience, not having taken a class on how to actually use their product, so the classes tend to skimp on the very material for which they test. Given that this is so, I fail to see how someone attempting to get INTO the field could possibly do so, since a baseline requirement is either experience or a certification. Without either, people are almost completely barred from the IT field except by purest chance. The classes I teach are intended to prepare people to implement the product and use it in a real world environment, but until the test is passed, my students have no chance except braindumps and prep tests to get ready for the exam. I do NOT recommend that they memorize the tests, but rather use them as an aid to their studies to find out what others saw on the tests, and then use their study materials to find the answers. Additionally, "cheating" is a rather strong term to use when referring to using braindumps, since this is a method that is used widely in almost every other field starting in grade school (i.e. - consulting others who have already seen the test), and is a process that has made tests virtually unpassable without having some clue as to what the test will actually cover in advance of taking it. As an example, I have taught MOC course 2153, which purports to prepare people for test 70-216, but the test actually covers OSPF extensively, and the class dedicates less than half of one page to OSPF, and has NOTHING about use or configuration, simply a mention that it exists. I fail to see how this is preparation for the exam!
9/13/01: kjzeusman says: I totally agree with you Greg - how can people who lie and cheat their way to MCSE have any pride? Not only that, what the heck do they really know anyway ? People have forgotten the fundamental goal of MCSE - to gain knowledge, to learn and to UNDERSTAND - not to lie, cheat and steal. I have worked with "paper MCSE's" and let me tell you, what a farce - some of them barely new what NTFS was, let alone work with it. My advice: lots of hands-on practise, learn from a variety of sources (CBT's, books, instructor-led), and lots of heart, and you'll achieve your goals. P.S. I passed all my exams without ANY braindumps or cheat sheets!!
9/13/01: Joshua says: I think what it really comes down to is the inability of, or lack of desire of, major corporations (MS, Novell, etc.) to even attempt to provide ample knowledge and information to pass the exams. Now, if the exams are supposed to be a reflection of real life, then it would be reasonable to conclude that the exams should be a preparation for real world. However, they are not. I am, admittedly, a paper MCSE. (Gasp!) I work in a Novell network, and pursued my MCSE W2k to prepare and leverage myself in the future. Perhaps I was misguided to pursue my MCSE while in a Netware environment, but the name of the game is diversity of skills...at least for now. I do not condone brain dumps, but, knowledge is knowledge and, if the skill shortage is really there, anyone worth their weight in technical manuals will be able to quickly learn what to do. It simple requires that people be honest -- taking the MOC curriculum does not give you enterprise AD-design knowledge!!
9/13/01: Anonymous says: You will never be able to give credibility to a certificate without backing it up in pracitice! Briandumps - if they allow me to get back to the job I do so well then I will use them, and assit others who may on these sites be looking for answers. Cheeting - not really - you still have to survive the daily events! F
9/14/01: Ice says: well, guys... The only way to weed out cert. holders who purely use braindumps or by memorizing practice exam questions is: conduct lab exams!!! See, there is no braindumps for CCIE Labs, and even there are, it will is impossible to memorize the actions that to be taken to pass the lab. I believe conducting lab exams for MCSE (just like for MOUS) will improve the value of MCSE certification. Ice Beer, IceBeer, MCSE+I (NT4), MCSE (Win2000), CCNA, CCDA, A+, Net+.
9/17/01: Anonymous says: Good on you Ice Beer, IceBeer. You are right.
9/19/01: Becky says: Henry -- Transcender has refuted that rumor multiple times. I don't know exactly how they go about developing their practice exams, but if you contact "Spike" -- a.k.a James Kelley -- I'm sure he'd be willing to fill you in on the details. He can be reached at [email protected].
First Page   Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “Certification Ethics 101”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top