CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
"
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  e-Book Shop
  Practice Exams
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Job Search
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Ireland Hotels
Copenhagen Denmark
Darwin Hotels
San Antonio Hotels
Tajikistan Hotels
Saskatchewan Hotels
Kazakhstan Hotels
Orlando Hotels
Pensacola Hotels
Estonia Hotels

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Sunday: December 26, 2004



The New TechMentor Register Early and Save!
  • 6 New Tracks
  • Focused Training
  • Year-End Savings
Register by
Dec. 31st
and save $300 off
the new TechMentor!

* REGISTERED USERS ONLY

MS: Accelerated Exam Was "Learning Experience"


1/23/2002 -- The Windows 2000 Accelerated Exam was Microsoft's first try at a composite test, and although it isn't saying whether it considers the exam a success or not, Redmond hasn't ruled them out in the future.

In an interview with Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine, Anne Marie McSweeney, Microsoft's director of certification skills and assessment, declined to give the pass/fail rates for the Accelerated Exam, saying that "disclosing information like this can be really, really misleading."

The Windows 2000 Accelerated Exam, which expired at the end of 2001, was available to anyone who had finished the Windows NT 4.0 core exams. An alternative to taking the core four Win2K tests, it was free to test-takers, but was also a one-shot deal: If you failed it, you couldn't retake it, and failing any one out of the four sections also resulted in a failing grade for the entire exam.

"This was a 1.0 [version of the test]: Keep that in mind," McSweeney said. "I would say we learned a lot from it. It provided an option for customers, and given that the technology's advanced, it's given us the ability to create a better solution next time." In the future, she suggested, a composite test might be structured such that candidates could take make-up exams for those modules failed.

Microsoft emphasized in the interview that 70-240 was "psychometrically sound."

McSweeney did admit to some frustration among those who attempted the test. "70-240 was not as customer-friendly as we'd like." But overall, she added, "I'm satisfied. I look at the learning we got from it that we can apply to future exams."

Although the evidence is entirely anecdotal at this point, it's apparent that a large number of test-takers, even perhaps a majority, failed the exam. Those who failed have to take each exam individually on their way to their Windows 2000 MCSE. Those who passed still have to take one design elective and two other electives to receive their credential.  -Keith Ward, MCPMag.com



There are 32 CertCities.com user Comments for “MS: Accelerated Exam Was "Learning Experience"”
Page 4 of 4
2/12/02: Barry from London says: I'm one of the group of people who took and failed the 240 exam. However, as somebody else admitted, I failed because I hadn't prepared as well as I should. I'm not going to whinge about how the questions didn't accurately reflect the real world because when you deal with MS exams there is a need to differentiate the real world from Microsofts Utopia where everybody uses Windows and Unix in any form does not exist. My complaint is simple - I'd like to know how close (or far away) I was from passing & which sections I need to brush up on for when I do the individual exams. I do happen to think that, since the exam was structured into 4 clear sub-exams which directly correlate to the full exams, a pass could have been awarded for those sections where I did achieve a passing score (assuming of course that I passed at least one section). And the most annoying thing of all - I put these points into a constructive email to Microsoft and didn't even get the decency of an acknowledgement.
2/15/02: JAS (Just Another Scoundrel) from Ramstein, Germany says: I have to agree with the other scoundrels. I worked with Win2K since shortly after the release of Beta Three. I spent hours in a lab - both at home and work; wore out the Bindings on the my first Resource kit (literly had pages falling out); worked through every MSPress training kit I could get my hands on. I sat for the exam in early Novemeber of 2000 and passed. The biggest thing that stands out was the lack of gimme questions. The test felt like the test writers sat down with the four full tests and removed every question that could have been used on the NT 4.0 exams. So what you are left with is all Win2k material. IMHO, this is what made the test so tough. If I had to bet I would speculate that most people were failing the Network Infrastructure and Directory Service Administration portions of the exam. In the end I believe the exam was fair and did what it was designed to do - provide an upgrade to Win2k for those that were proficent in supporting the OS in the Enterprise. So, in closing, if you didn't pass the exam suck it up and get to work on the core four.
First Page   Previous Page     Last Page

Want to post a comment under this article? Please register. It's free, it's easy, and you'll only need to register once to access all of CertCities.com's exam reviews, tips articles, the ability to post under articles, and more. Click on the button below to start your registration,or read our FAQ if you'd like more information.
Already registered? Log in here:
User Name:
Password:
Remember me on this computer
" Forgot User Name/Password

top

Sponsored Links:
MeasureUp 10 Day Practice Test: - Only $20!
Save $300 Thru December 31: TechMentor Orlando, April 4-8, 2005
Controlling Quality in Software Packages: FREE Webinar and White Paper
Keep Current on Microsoft News: Subscribe to Redmond Report Newsletter
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!



Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Job Search | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Copyright 1996-2004 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications