CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
"
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  e-Book Shop
  Practice Exams
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Job Search
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
California Hotels
Golden CO Hotels
Baltimore Hotels
Liechtenstein Hotels
North Tampa FL Hotels
Ontario Hotels
Greenwood Village CO Hotels
Newfoundland Hotels
Cocoa Beach Hotels
Plantation FL Hotels

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Thursday: January 6, 2005



The New TechMentor Register Early and Save!
  • 6 New Tracks
  • Exam Discounts
  • Year-End Savings
Register by
March 4th
and save $200 off
the new TechMentor!

* REGISTERED USERS ONLY

CompTIA Updates CTT+, Plans New IT Project+ Release


9/17/2003 -- On Sept. 9 the Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA) updated its CTT+ exam to new 2003 objectives, released three weeks prior.

Earning CTT+, CompTIA's technical trainer title, is a two-step process: Candidates must first pass a written exam, then a video review of their teaching skills.

The title's video-based evaluation updated to the new objectives Sept.12.

The change was somewhat unexpected: The release date of the 2003 exams was not pre-announced on the organization's Web site. And, with this update, the new exams instantly replaced the previous 2001 versions, whereas typically CompTIA gives candidates a one- to two-month "overlap" period where both version are available.

A CompTIA spokesperson could not say exactly why the switch was not pre-announced, but did say that the timing of the release "relates to legal and contractual topics relevant to the acquisition of the exam" from the The Chauncey Group two years ago.

She also commented that the objective changes "are not significant."

"Anyone who studied using the 2001 objectives should have no problem passing these exams," she said.

The new exam code for the written exam is TK0-201. The new exam code for the video review is TKO-202. The 2003 objectives can be downloaded here in PDF format.

Candidates currently in the process of certifying can mix-and-match the objective versions: e.g., a candidate who already passed the 2001 written can use the 2003 objective-based video review to earn the title.

Like all CompTIA certifications, CTT+ is good for life and does not need to be renewed once earned.

CompTIA is also in the process of updating its IT Project+ exam to new 2003 objectives, released in June. The organization has characterized this update as a "significant revision."

The spokesperson told CertCities.com that the release date for the 2003 IT Project+ exam has not yet been set. With this release, the organization plans to have an overlap period, giving candidates a chance to choose between the two versions.

For more information on IT Project+, click here.

For more information on CTT+, click here.  -Becky Nagel



There are 16 CertCities.com user Comments for “CompTIA Updates CTT+, Plans New IT Project+ Release”
Page 1 of 2
9/17/03: Tcat Houser says: I am susprised that CompTIA did not give ample notice of the change. And it certainly appears from what I have gathered to have virtually zero impact to the CTT candidate. The change appears to be soley the result of NIH (Not Invented Here). It is now "job task analysis" instead of "The Standards -- Volume 1" IT Project is a completely different matter.
9/18/03: Just a heads up says: I do hold IT Project Plus and it hasn't done a thing for me. There's just not much interest in it at all. So far, it's nothing but a wasted $200 PLUS dollars!!!
9/18/03: IT Project certified says: Agree in full "Just a heads up." I attained this certification and management officials I talked to could have cared less. It's sad, because CompTIA and sites like CertCities say that this particular certification has merit. I'd like for someone to tell me where this certification holds wait (geographically), because I would like to see it pay off somehow.
9/18/03: Anonymous says: That's where CompTIA is weakest these days...getting companies to place value on their certs. Aplus was easy, but they've had trouble with every cert since.
9/18/03: The Truth says: Looks like the IT Project plus would only have value if either (or both) of the following were true: 1. if PMI allowed holders of the CompTIA IT Project plus cert advanced standing (or consideration) towards the PMP 2. if CompTIA had an ISO9000 standard for all its certs, including IT Project Plus
9/23/03: Anonymous says: Mo Money
9/23/03: Anonymous says: Wake up. The fact is, and has been, that other than A Plus, there is no value to other CompTIA certs. And A Plus is only good for the most entry level computer job, like working at CompUSA or Best Buy, not for the real IT world. All CompTIA certs are ENTRY LEVEL.
9/24/03: TO anonymous 9-23-03 says: Thanks for filling me in on what I already knew........can you come up with something better?
9/25/03: Wanted to share this says: Here was a post from another CompTIA related posting........................................: Can you back their value up with concrete facts? I'm talking about statistics that prove your are such and such better off with the CompTIA cert then those who aren't. Sun, Cisco, and Microsuck have at least tried to put this type of validity behind their tests. They also go to such lengths as to prove what salary ranges you might attain with a certain cert. CompTIA has never done this to my knowledge. If they had proven numbers such as these, CompTIA wouldn't be slammed on as much. It would be relatively easy for them to do. Just have them reach out to their current cert holders and get feedback as to the relativity that their certs played in cert holder's current salary--knowing what salary range they have achieved is crucial as well. They won't do this because CompTIA officials know what will happen. Now do you get the picture as to why so many people don't put much weight into CompTIA's $200 PLUS tests?
9/25/03: Wanted to share this says: Here was a post from another CompTIA related posting........................................: Can you back their value up with concrete facts? I'm talking about statistics that prove your are such and such better off with the CompTIA cert then those who aren't. Sun, Cisco, and Microsuck have at least tried to put this type of validity behind their tests. They also go to such lengths as to prove what salary ranges you might attain with a certain cert. CompTIA has never done this to my knowledge. If they had proven numbers such as these, CompTIA wouldn't be slammed on as much. It would be relatively easy for them to do. Just have them reach out to their current cert holders and get feedback as to the relativity that their certs played in cert holder's current salary--knowing what salary range they have achieved is crucial as well. They won't do this because CompTIA officials know what will happen. Now do you get the picture as to why so many people don't put much weight into CompTIA's $200 PLUS tests?
First Page   Next Page   Last Page

Want to post a comment under this article? Please register. It's free, it's easy, and you'll only need to register once to access all of CertCities.com's exam reviews, tips articles, the ability to post under articles, and more. Click on the button below to start your registration,or read our FAQ if you'd like more information.
Already registered? Log in here:
User Name:
Password:
Remember me on this computer
" Forgot User Name/Password

top

Sponsored Links:
MeasureUp Practice Tests On Sale: Get your A+, MCDST, MCSA, or MCSE!
Free Authorized Cisco eLearning: from Global Knowledge
TechMentor is Back in Orlando with 6 New Tracks: April 4-8, 2005
Keep Current on Microsoft News: Subscribe to Redmond Report Newsletter
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!



Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Job Search | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Copyright 1996-2005 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications