Study: Proliferation, Lack of Experience Req. May Be Hurting Certs
3/19/2003 -- According to Thomson-Prometric's third annual "Global IT Training and Certification Study," while managers overall support IT certification, the sheer number of certifications available combined with a lack of experience prerequisites "has led some managers to discontinue using certification as a way to judge the skills of job candidates."
This could be an indication of larger backlash in relation to an "everyone is doing it" trend, the study states.
In a section called "Challenges and Opportunities for the IT Certification Industry," the study's authors write:
"Following its debut as a measure of skills assessment and technological competency, IT certification has grown to take on a life of its own, with many candidates pursuing certification as a means of standing out from the crowd in a tough employment market. The impact of this trend is that...certification may be in danger of being viewed as a commodity."
"While managers appreciate that a candidate has invested time and effort in becoming certified, [managers] want more assurance or proof that a certification translates into the skills and abilities necessary to function in day-to-day IT life."
According to the study, certification does appear to be losing some power in terms of bringing monetary benefits to IT professionals. Those rewarded for their certifications with salary increases dropped 4 percent in 2002 to 18 percent. Those rewarded with a promotion stayed flat at 9 percent.
The study also says that there's a "gap" in what certified professionals see as value of certification and how managers perceive it, "specifically what certification delivers in terms of performance and competence on the job."
To combat this, the study's authors recommend that certification vendors structure exams so that they measure "both the theory behind the technology and its practical, hands-on" application as well as focus more on tying experience to specific credentials.
The study also found that managers who have less experience in the IT field (15 years or fewer) are "significantly" more likely to see the value in having a technically certified staff member as compared to more experienced managers who have been in the field for 16 years or more. The study attributes this gap to an "age of certification" -- e.g., younger managers are more accepting of certification "because it was part of their career development experience."
Other interesting findings in the study, which examines a wide variety of behaviors and attitudes toward certifications by both candidates and managers, include:
- Top reasons for IT professionals to achieve certifications in 2002 were increased credibility, assessing skills and increased compensation.
- For those already certified, there was a 4 percent point drop in those seeking certification to increase salary, and a more than 50 percent drop overall in those seeking certification in order to get a new job.
- The top benefits of certification as seen by IT managers are higher level of service (22 percent), increased productivity (20 percent) and increased credibility with clients (19 percent).
- The perceived value of certification varies by region. In China, the top reason cited by IT pros to become certified is to increase productivity (33 percent). The top reason in India and the United States is to help find a job (22 percent and 19 percent, respectively). The top reason in Latin America is to increase credibility (36 percent).
- Overall, candidates in India are the most positive toward certification, and those in Europe are least likely to reap financial benefits from certification.
- Younger candidates (under 30) are more likely to see certification as a "stepping stone" than older candidates, but less likely to take an exam due to financial considerations.
- Use of all training methods is up across the board. The use of self study products rose to 87 percent, up from 61 percent in 2001. Seventy seven percent of candidates used a self-assessment test in 2002, up from 46 percent in 2001. The use of instructor-based remained fairly stable at 47 percent, up one percentage point from the previous study.
- Instructor led training is much bigger in China (88 percent) than in other regional areas.
The 2002 study uses results obtained from more than 8,000 IT professionals, including surveys of 3,036 test-takers at worldwide Prometric centers, 5,207 survey respondents who had previously taken exams at Prometric centers, and in-depth interviews with 23 IT professionals in Chicago, London and Singapore.
A PDF of the results can be downloaded from Prometric's Web site here. -B.N. with Mike Domingo, MCPMag.com.
|
There are 63 user Comments for “Study: Proliferation, Lack of Experience Req. May Be Hurting Certs”
|
Page 5 of 7
|
3/25/03: Anonymous says: |
BetMen is a loser |
3/25/03: BetMen from USA says: |
Yeah...so what?! |
3/25/03: Anonymous from Cincinnati says: |
I believe certifications will compliment work experience, but clearly work experience is more important when hiring. So certifications may play more of a role in helping to hire lesser-experienced people. I would agree that certifications are not the primary reason people get hired in my company. They currently play a very small role. |
3/25/03: BetMen from USA says: |
Yes I agree but most of college graduates don't have experience yet hence we're looking for our first job for it. How can a fresh graduate have 5 year experience in networking while those 5 years was when he was in college? OK better yet he has built a small home lab to practice networking, but then it'll be the time they'll say "having small home lab doesn't count as valid experience" duhh!! So what do we do, that we're now graduated/certed, spent so much money for college, thus need an income to live, no experience and looking for one...how is it if everyone only wants "5 yrs experience, instead of degree/certs, or worse, both...how? |
3/25/03: Anonymous says: |
Most folks work at their school helpdesk or NOC even, dare I say have a real job with PC's to get them though school! Wake up a degree and certs plus experience beats you everytime. So, you no cert having chumps better watch your back! It is hard to compete with the triple threat(EXP, CERTS, DEGREE) no matter what color! ( Forgive me my major was not English so keep the comments to yourself, you get the point.) |
3/26/03: BetMen from USA says: |
I am a total loser! |
3/26/03: BetMen go and prosper says: |
Maybe you should stop reading these mindless message boards, and dedicate more time to the job search. Focusing on these silly people blabbering all day and feeling sorry for yourself because of lack of "experience" is a sucky way to waste time. Good luck finding a job --- seriously, no sarcasm implied! |
3/26/03: BillTR from Prince George, BC says: |
You know, there are a lot of interesting points of view here. In Canada, we have Government sponsored apprenticeships available to us. These take four years to complete and are served under a Journeyman technician. THAT certification says that the individual not only knows his/her 'stuff' but also has had the training under an experienced tech in the field. Our apprenticeship certificates say that a Journeyman has been trained AND has experience in the actual application of their technology path. These trade certifications should be the BASIC certification. They speak to a good firm foundation of basic knowledge. THEN one adds the various manufacturers certifications to expand their skill sets. Too many people try to treat the manufacturers' certifications as the be-all and end-all of IT training. Others scorn them as unnecessary...thinking that because they do the job at work without the certification, that certification must be worthless. Unfortunately, neither point of view is actually valid. In fact, a good BASIC training is absolutely necessary as a prerequisite to more 'advanced' and product-specific training. The problem is that the various manufacturers' certifications assume that those taking them already have the basic training. A blend of BOTH is vital. To succeed in this industry, one first needs s good grounding in the basics and then also needs the product-specific advanced training. This cannot be achieved overnight and the potential entrant to this most challenging field has to expect to get in at an entry level and then carry out a parallel training path and work path for the rest of their life in the IT trade. If you think that experience by itself is enough to get by on...you are a fool. The certification is not the point. It is the knowledge that you have to amass to attain the certification that is valuable. The certifications are only the yardstick used to measure that knowledge. If you attain your certifications by any other means than hard study and attaining a complete understanding of the technology behind them, you are not only cheating a potential employer, you are doing much worse...cheating YOURSELF. Those who think they do not need the certifications are equally doing themselves a disservice. If you haven't followed a structured training path - either by formal classes or by regimented home-study or CBT's, the problem now becomes one of "You don't know WHAT it is that you don't know!" We've all heard the old saying: "Ignorance is bliss." Old hands who think they do not need to study or certify are only fooling themselves. I'm speaking from experience here. I've been in electronics since 1970 and the IT field since 1980. I hold a BSc in Computer Engineering and a Journeymans' certificate from ITAC (BC's Industry Training and Apprenticeship Commision) as well as numerous manufacturers' certifications including A+, Network+, iNet+, Server+, ITProject+, Security+, 6x Novell CNA's, 6x Novell CNE's, Master CNE, 12x Microsoft MCP's, MCP+I, MCSE and more manufacturer's training certificates than I can count. Even with all that, I'm still training. I have already passed two exams this year and I have another 10 to go to meet my goals. And...I'll go from there next year. One CANNOT stop training in this industry. If you DO, you will be technically obsolete within one year. Just as a final note. I'm only specializing in hardware and operating environments. I do NO programming. AND, I'm damn good at what I do!! If you are only working in a 'closed environment', such as a single company with only one basic platform or infrastructure to take care of, training CAN seem to be a waste of time. BUT when your employer decides to upgrade or change their technology, what knowledge are you going to have about the technology they are going to implement? During a new technology roll-out is NOT the time to be learning about that new technology. Besides, if your employer does decide that you are one of the x% of people to be laid off, you will need the advanced training to obtain another job. Telling an employer that you spent the last six years (whatever!) supporting a NetWare 4 system will not cut it if they are using NetWare 6 or Windows 2000. Just my opinion... HTH. |
3/27/03: Excuse me from USA says: |
After twenty years in electronics, I have decided to get into IT. After consulting with several it professionals, they all suggest get certified. Now, in this forum many are calling certifications stupid, silly and worthless. If you have so much experience...why don't you get certified? It should be easy...right? |
3/27/03: Steve from Australia says: |
Part of the reason this stuff is so hard is because the experience in different fields within IT is so very different. I was a junior civil servant, and I wanted to become an IT contractor as a developer using Microsoft tools. I went and asked the kind of people who hired people for the sort of jobs I wanted "how can I make myself attractive to you?" They said certify, and take an entry job to get experience, and then progress. I did, and have never had any difficulty getting work. (Of course, I have experience around IT, and a university degree in another field.) My biggest advice to people in the job hunt: think about whether the tone you are portraying is right: - you need experience to be worth the good jobs, so start at entry level - customers have business problems and are looking for people to help them, not for people who brag about their anything (not certs, not degrees, not even years of experience) - think about the right type of work for you, and find out what they are looking for What value do I see in certification? At least for a Office/VB developer, it gets you started, broadens your knowledge, and keeps you learning. |
First Page Previous Page Next Page Last Page
|
|
|
|