CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Keep on Top of the Latest Certification News: Subscribe to CertCities.com Newsletter
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: Content Cops

Managing in Isolation

Keep an Eye on Those Servers

6 Steps to a Simpler Network

Your Turn: The Good and the Bad of MBSA


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Bowling Green Hotels
Breastfeeding Medications
Hotels in Pingtung
North Acton Hotels
Windows Network Software
Las Vegas The Paris
Panama City Beach Hotels
Tombstone Az Hotels
Hotels in Pontorson France
Hotel Booking France

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Tuesday: May 3, 2005

-- advertisement --
Free white papers, case studies, research and more for the IT Manager:

Blade Systems Move into the Mainstream

Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance

StorageWorks for E-mail Retention

Policy-based Data Management

IT Service Management


Microsoft Considers Change on Pass/Fail Policy


4/10/2002 -- Changes may be in the air for the pass/fail scoring system Microsoft implemented on its certification exams earlier this year. (See "Microsoft Moves to Pass/Fail Scoring System"). In an interview during Tech-Ed, being held this week, Director of Microsoft Certification Anne Marie McSweeney said her group is trying to "look at the approach we took before... to give [testing candidates] more information."

Previous exams provided candidates with a diagnostic report at the end of the test, which provided both a numeric score and a module-by-module summary of his or her performance. This provided candidates who failed an exam with an idea about those areas of the test objectives that needed additional study.

The latest approach, widely scorned by many MCPs, provides only a pass or fail verdict.

McSweeney said the group will probably not return to a numeric scoring, since a pass score changes depending on what version of an exam the candidate has taken and what questions are in that particular exam.

But, she said, Microsoft does want to provide at least enough information to those candidates who fell short so that they know whether they failed "miserably or just a little bit."

McSweeney said the group may hold online chats about the topic with MCPs in the near future to get feedback.  -- D.S., courtesy of MCPMag.com



There are 46 CertCities.com user Comments for “Microsoft Considers Change on Pass/Fail Policy”
Page 1 of 5
4/10/02: Greg Neilson says: I'm pleased that they are reconsidering this. But they seem to be in react mode yet again, so it makes one wonder if the MS certification folks really know what they are doing here.
4/10/02: Ben Ice from Clearwater, FL says: With the uproar they created they had no choice but to react. The problem is that they've steered the boat on it' current course and it would be way too much crow in their collective diet to change the system. I'm sure they'll come up with some half-baked excuse for a reporting system to try and ease the concerns regarding modular scoring.
4/10/02: Lamarr C from Jackson,NJ says: If its not broke dont fix it, oops too late.Bring back the module by module scoring then you can work on screwing something else up.
4/10/02: Yeti-GBR1 from UK says: I cannot see how this should effect anyone, the Pass/Fail is far more fair than a score is in my view. Let's face it you pass or fail a driving test (however the examiner/tester knows the scores) but you as the testee you are only interested in the Pass/Fail critreria. Having said that, I do think that they should give feedback on areas that the testee appears weak in. As for the scores...they are a waste of time in My opinion, they are for people who like numbers rathere than words.
4/10/02: Yeti-GBR1 from UK says: I cannot see how this should effect anyone, the Pass/Fail is far more fair than a score is in my view. Let's face it you pass or fail a driving test (however the examiner/tester knows the scores) but you as the testee you are only interested in the Pass/Fail critreria. Having said that, I do think that they should give feedback on areas that the testee appears weak in. As for the scores...they are a waste of time in My opinion, they are for people who like numbers rathere than words.
4/10/02: Major payne from USA says: Duh! Gee, yah think? If I have to pay $125, I wan't more than a pass/fail to pop up at the end. I want a numerical score. I want to have a diagnostic read out to tell me where I am good and where I need improvement. I have been holding off on taking any M$oft exams right now, because of the money issue-- I'm unemployed and have to prospect at this moment, and I was hoping M$oft would see the error of their ways. BTW, M$oft, just because Cisco raises their prices, doesn't mean you need to too! If they jumped off the Brooklyn Bridge, would you follow? You get the idea. TTFN
4/12/02: envoid from USA says: Major Payne hit the nail on the head. I had to BORROW the loot to take my last 3 tests. At $125 a pop, not giving some concrete info, especially for those who may fail a test, is plain unfair. I was extremely fortunate not to fail any of my exams, but had the result been different, I don't know if I could have justified a re-test for an additional $125 without knowing how badly I had failed, or which areas I needed work in...
4/12/02: Sid from UK says: This only realy matters to people who fail exams. If you pass then that's all you need to know.But if you fail you need to know what areas you were week in and why you didn't pass. Perhaps Microsoft could give scores just to people who fail so they can have some idea of how much work they need to do to bring them up to the required standard.
4/12/02: John from Texas says: Perhaps a pass/fail by module would resolve the concerns about knowing where to study??? I will confess to being -E-X-T-R-E-M-E-L-Y- upset when I failed the '240 and didn't have a clue what sections were strong or weak. I thought I had it nailed... But, it Microsoft's bat and ball and whatever rules they want are the ones we gotta play by...
4/12/02: Paul from Texas says: I'm with John on that one....I'm an MCSE 4.0...never failed a test...Checkpoint CCSE...passed all of those...then I take the 240 and thought I was good to go...Iwas not discouraged though...I couldn't believe I had failed...since then with no more than two days of study for each module..I passed 210, 215, and 218 first time...what do I conclude? I know the material, I knew the material....and I am proving it everyday....there is something more to this 240 test than meets the eye...
First Page   Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “Microsoft Considers Change on Pass/Fail Policy”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

top

Sponsored Links:
Free Authorized Cisco eLearning: from Global Knowledge
FREE PRACTICE EXAMS: Test Gurus
Exchange migration survival guide and poster: It's new and it's FREE!
Subscribe to Redmond magazine: It’s free and available in print or PDF!
Fresh Cisco White Papers: Get them now on TCPmag.com
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!




Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Coming July 2005 Redmond Channel Partner magazine.
Copyright 1996-2005 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications