CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
"
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  e-Book Shop
  Practice Exams
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Chinle AZ Hotels
Florida Hotels
Amarillo Hotels
Boise Hotels
Norfolk Hotels
Miramar FL Hotels
Snowmass Village CO Hotels
Indianapolis Hotels
Fargo Hotels
Detroit Hotels

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Monday: January 10, 2005



The New TechMentor Register Early and Save!
  • 6 New Tracks
  • Exam Discounts
  • Year-End Savings
Register by
March 4th
and save $200 off
the new TechMentor!

* REGISTERED USERS ONLY

Microsoft Moves to Pass/Fail Scoring System


1/16/2002 -- MCP Magazine has been given official word that Microsoft will no longer give test-takers an overall score on exams, opting instead for a simple pass/fail system.

Anne Marie McSweeney, Microsoft’s director of certification skills and assessment, said in an interview with MCP Magazine editors that the new grading method started in December 2001 and will include all future exams.

Even though the pass/fail system was introduced last year, most members of the certification community weren’t aware of the change. Microsoft didn’t make a general announcement about the revamped scoring, originally releasing the information in a FAQ section on its Web site.

“People will notice it most with 70-218,” McSweeney said. 70-218 (Managing a Windows 2000 Network Environment) is a core test for the new MCSA credential, which Microsoft expects to be very popular.

Microsoft decided to drop scoring, according to McSweeney, because, “scores are misleading. People put too much credence into what the scores mean.”

McSweeney added that giving an overall score, “introduces a mysterious element and gives odd perceptions ... At the end of the day,” McSweeney continued, beta testers said that, “pass/fail was what they cared about.”

Aware that Microsoft could appear to be imposing its will on the MCP community, McSweeney said, “We don’t want to look arrogant. The onus is on us to present our case” to the public and explain Redmond’s rationale for the change.

This is the second recent change Microsoft has made to how it notifies test-takers of their scores. For years, the company gave not only a total score, but section-by-section scores so testers could identify areas of weakness. More recently, Microsoft dropped section scoring in favor of an overall score and pass/fail bar. -- MCPMag.com



There are 101 CertCities.com user Comments for “Microsoft Moves to Pass/Fail Scoring System”
Page 5 of 11
1/22/02: anynomous says: STOP WHINNING...........USE YOUR ENERGY FOR OTHER POSTIVE THING DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO DO BESIDE WHINNING....
1/22/02: Anonymous says: An excellent move by Microsoft. Attaining a high score does not mean that you are a better worker or more intelligent. A lot of people have attained high scores through the use of BrainDumps and Exam Cheats. In the end, it's still the practical experiences that counts.
1/22/02: Anonymous says: An excellent move by Microsoft. Attaining a high score does not mean that you are a better worker or more intelligent. A lot of people have attained high scores through the use of Brain Dumps and Exam Cheats. In the end, it's still the practical experiences that count.
1/22/02: nil from nil says: An excellent move by Microsoft. Attaining a high score does not mean that you are a better worker or more intelligent. A lot of people have attained high scores through the use of Brain Dumps and Exam Cheats. In the end, it's still the practical experiences that count.
1/23/02: Anonymous says: As much as I like to see my areas of weakness on the reports, I do agree with Micorsoft's decision to change the scoring to Pass or Fail. I find that there is too much competitiveness over scores on exams, when in reality, most people are never tested on the exact same material. For myself, I will not go in to write an exam unless I feel prepared, and confident that I have a good knowledge of whatever they may ask.
1/23/02: keith mulligan from lowell, ma says: I recently took the 70-210 exam, I didn’t do as well as I was hopping, but I passed. I didn’t rely on brain dumps to pass the exam,(like a lot of guys I know). I’m studying for the 70-215 test now, with a major sinus infection like I had with the first exam. But at least I know I passed with all the studying and hard work I put into my studies, and if I failed it was on me. I didn’t have to rely on someone giving me the answers to the questions, welcome to the real world. The question of whether someone taking the exams is relying on brain dumps to pass the exams is up to them. The real test they will face is in the real world. But as far as the pass or fail testing, it is really no different than other methods of testing, you either know what your doing, or you don’t.
1/23/02: Dino Sims from Atlanta, GA says: Hmmm... At first glance this seems like a bad move. But upon further inspection this could actually help the Microsoft certification programs gain more credibility. I think that it is safe to say that due to brain dumps, boot camps and other things that the Microsoft cert is not held in as high esteem (or pay) as other certs like those from Cisco, and Novell. If MS goes to a pass-fail system, it might make it easier for them to adjust the scoring system more dynamically in order to preserve the integrity of the exam, and thereby increasing the value of Microsoft Certifications. It's much harder to pass an exam, if you don't know a failing or passing score is. You really have to know the material cold. At the very least, we'd all have to study harder :-) Another thing that MS should do is create different versions of their exams and release them at different times. When I took my CISSP exam there were 5 different tests that were distributed that day. The test that I took, was different than the test that the 4 people around me were taking. So even if someone created a braindump for that exam it would be of minimal use. Just my humble opinion, Dino Sims, IT Networking and Security Consultant CISSP, CCNP, CCDP, CCNA, CCDA, MSCE, MCT, MCP+I, Network+, A+
1/23/02: Brad Schmitz from Lincoln, NE says: If I fail I would like to know by how much. If I pass I don't care by how much.
1/23/02: Tim from CA says: Everybody has to understand that score means nothingb because, when you get to the job, you'll forgot everything learn from books and trainning meterial. So i think Microsoft should take move to lab exam or something that people prove really know this stuff. I disagree all of your comment above.
1/23/02: Tod says: I agree with Microsofts decision. Passing the test shows that you know the product well enough to answer their questions. It's not an exam to show how well you can answer questions. If I gave you an exam on getting dressed, you could ace that test because you are familiar enough with the process. You wouldn't have to cram for the exam. If you are familiar enough with the product, you will pass. And that's all that matters.
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page

Want to post a comment under this article? Please register. It's free, it's easy, and you'll only need to register once to access all of CertCities.com's exam reviews, tips articles, the ability to post under articles, and more. Click on the button below to start your registration,or read our FAQ if you'd like more information.
Already registered? Log in here:
User Name:
Password:
Remember me on this computer
" Forgot User Name/Password

top

Sponsored Links:
MeasureUp Practice Tests On Sale: Get your A+, MCDST, MCSA, or MCSE!
Free Authorized Cisco eLearning: from Global Knowledge
TechMentor is Back in Orlando with 6 New Tracks: April 4-8, 2005
Keep Current on Microsoft News: Subscribe to Redmond Report Newsletter
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!



Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Copyright 1996-2005 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications