CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
"
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  e-Book Shop
  Practice Exams
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Oro Valley AZ Hotels
Rochester Hotels
Russia Hotels
Cortez CO Hotels
Cottonwood AZ Hotels
Victoria Hotels
Heidelberg Germany
Canberra Hotels
Ocean City Hotels
North Redington Beach FL Hotels

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Monday: January 10, 2005



The New TechMentor Register Early and Save!
  • 6 New Tracks
  • Exam Discounts
  • Year-End Savings
Register by
March 4th
and save $200 off
the new TechMentor!

* REGISTERED USERS ONLY

Microsoft Moves to Pass/Fail Scoring System


1/16/2002 -- MCP Magazine has been given official word that Microsoft will no longer give test-takers an overall score on exams, opting instead for a simple pass/fail system.

Anne Marie McSweeney, Microsoft’s director of certification skills and assessment, said in an interview with MCP Magazine editors that the new grading method started in December 2001 and will include all future exams.

Even though the pass/fail system was introduced last year, most members of the certification community weren’t aware of the change. Microsoft didn’t make a general announcement about the revamped scoring, originally releasing the information in a FAQ section on its Web site.

“People will notice it most with 70-218,” McSweeney said. 70-218 (Managing a Windows 2000 Network Environment) is a core test for the new MCSA credential, which Microsoft expects to be very popular.

Microsoft decided to drop scoring, according to McSweeney, because, “scores are misleading. People put too much credence into what the scores mean.”

McSweeney added that giving an overall score, “introduces a mysterious element and gives odd perceptions ... At the end of the day,” McSweeney continued, beta testers said that, “pass/fail was what they cared about.”

Aware that Microsoft could appear to be imposing its will on the MCP community, McSweeney said, “We don’t want to look arrogant. The onus is on us to present our case” to the public and explain Redmond’s rationale for the change.

This is the second recent change Microsoft has made to how it notifies test-takers of their scores. For years, the company gave not only a total score, but section-by-section scores so testers could identify areas of weakness. More recently, Microsoft dropped section scoring in favor of an overall score and pass/fail bar. -- MCPMag.com



There are 101 CertCities.com user Comments for “Microsoft Moves to Pass/Fail Scoring System”
Page 4 of 11
1/21/02: D Smith from Riverside,Ca says: How can people act like they want their scores? I for one know for fact that no 2 people will get the same exams. How can you compare your score with someone elses who took a different test? You cant. It all boils down th whether or not you can do the job. Cert or no cert!
1/21/02: Jabroni from Smackdown Hotel says: I agree with Mike from Fl. If you are going to give me passfail, at least have the decency to tell me the areas that I am weak in. I also agree with D Smith to a certain extent. Everyone makes a valid point one way or another however, no two minds are alike and everyone does things differently. If you are going to do Pass-Fail, then tell me my weaknesses!
1/21/02: Everett from Evansville, IN says: I assume this has something to do with how they are doing adaptive tests now rather than long or short form. In an adaptive test you might not get tested the same as another person taking the same test. This could lead to the score being misleading.
1/21/02: Reality Check says: Let's face it...employers are looking for experience, capability, problem-solving skills and attitude. Pass or Fail makes sense because these credentials (and all your other degrees, etc.) only get you in the door. Once you're in, all the perfect scores won't help you or your job if you can't get the job done.
1/21/02: Anonymous says: For once I agree with Microsoft (very unsual). Getting 900 on a test does not mean that you actually know the product. Anyone can pick up a book, go to braindump, by all those study guides and score real high. Does this mean they actually know what they are doing? NO. If you have confidence in your ability the score should not matter to you. The person who barely passed and the one who scored 1000 are both MCSE.
1/22/02: Mr. JR from Somewhere in Fly Over Country says: Reality Check has made the point. I know some of those high score people and find that they are lacking in the real world but.... you know the balance of this statement. These certifications don't mean a thing unless you're looking for a job to open doors or you're an intsructor. Thanks Microsoft for taking the wind out of some peoples sails and putting all on an even playing field!
1/22/02: Be Smart from USA says: If you read the MCP website, they were concerned about people with high passing scores "bragging" about their scores. They want a low pass to equal a high pass. Fair enough Microsoft. However, you rigging the MCP test group and not giving them the numerical score option insults our intelligence. WHAT ABOUT THE OPTION OF A PASS WITHOUT THE PASSING SCORE GIVEN AND A FAIL WITH THE FAILING SCORE GIVEN? This would satisfy everybody and accomplish your score misuse concerns. I guess that would be too easy for Anne Marie McSweeney, Microsoft’s director of certification skills and assessment, who is the dumb twit who made this latest change (and others) without our interests at heart. FYI: to answer a previous posting on why the 210 exam still gives a score is that all newly released exams will now NOT have scores and old exams will gradually have scores removed thoughout 2002. Just another issue to complain directly to Microsoft (they don't read these postings) and also ask for a new head of certifications (we can dream, can't we).
1/22/02: Nick says: Who cares anyway? These certifications (especially comptia & microsoft) don't mean a rats ass in the real world anyway. If you are doing it for your employer, fine. But why spend money taking a test for a Pass grade that won't do diddlysquat for you in the real world.
1/22/02: Anonymous says: The MCSE 2000 exams are a lot harder than NT4, Microsoft are testing you to make sure you have the required ability to administer and design their systems. Yes or no, pass of fail. If you are up to it then you get the cert - if you are not then go home and get your self up to scratch in ALL areas. This is why they are doing it. When you have sat for four hours studying six case studies and get a pass you know it is because you know your stuff, and you should be proud of that. I wonder how many posting comments here are doing so because they are not sure they are up to the 2000 track. It's hard and if you have passed then well done - it's a toughie and dont let anyone take it away from you... ( MCSE(2000), CCNA, CCDA )
1/22/02: Nick says: Yeah, but why waste time studying & paying money, if it won't get you in the door without experience (read: paper cert). You may as well be spending that time on a degree or an advanced degree
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page

Want to post a comment under this article? Please register. It's free, it's easy, and you'll only need to register once to access all of CertCities.com's exam reviews, tips articles, the ability to post under articles, and more. Click on the button below to start your registration,or read our FAQ if you'd like more information.
Already registered? Log in here:
User Name:
Password:
Remember me on this computer
" Forgot User Name/Password

top

Sponsored Links:
MeasureUp Practice Tests On Sale: Get your A+, MCDST, MCSA, or MCSE!
Free Authorized Cisco eLearning: from Global Knowledge
TechMentor is Back in Orlando with 6 New Tracks: April 4-8, 2005
Keep Current on Microsoft News: Subscribe to Redmond Report Newsletter
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!



Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Copyright 1996-2005 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications