MOUS Master Instructor Ed. Requirements Released
6/6/2001 -- On Friday, Microsoft announced the education requirements for its upcoming MOUS Master Instructor certification.
According to the MOUS.net Web site, candidates will need one of the following in order to apply for the program:
- A diploma or transcript indicating that the instructor has satisfied the requirements for a college degree in one or more fields of educational study; or
- Written verification from a current or past employer of two or more years of employment delivering competent training on Microsoft Office applications; or
- A certificate indicating that the instructor has completed a Microsoft-approved presentation skills or Train-the-Trainer course; or
- An instructor completion certificate from any of the following vendors: Caldera, Certified Internet Webmaster, Cisco Systems, Citrix, Lotus, Microsoft, Novell, Oracle or Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
The requirements are very similar to those required for its predecessor, the MOUS Authorized Instructor (MOUS AI) program.
As reported earlier by CertCities, Microsoft decided last month that it will replace the MOUS AI with the MOUS Master Instructor program this July. MOUS Master Instructor requires passing more exams than did the MOUS AI, and does not offer logo benefits. Fees and some other details of the new program still have yet to be determined, although Microsoft has said it will offer a discount to current MOUS AIs who apply to become MOUS Master Instructors.
For more on the MOUS Master Instructor program, click here.  -B.N.
|
There are 85  user Comments for “MOUS Master Instructor Ed. Requirements Released”
|
|
Page 3 of 9
|
| 6/16/01: Anonymous says: |
This change in the AI program (Anonymous) has nothing to do with updating skills. I am 100% sure that the majority of instructors who train students everyday are more than willing to update their skills. If you would survey most AI instructors, most have taken all the test except for maybe Outlook in which they just added to the MOUS Masters. Again, this is not about updating skills, this is about money. So,we are WHINING because Microsoft and Nivo knew they were going to change the criteria of the program; however, they still kept accepting our money for the AI program up to the time they announced the program was being discontinued. If it was not for this forum, I would not have known the program was being discontinued. I have yet to receive an email from NIVO stating the program was being discontinued and what would be done about the $50.00 processing fee. This is about money!!!!! I am the test administrator for our ATC center(of course the name has changed to IQcenter)They (NIVO team)are harrassing us everyday about purchasing more and more test because the test are going up in fee. So what it means is the upcharge for the test will passed on to (YOU)the consumer. So, if you still think we are whining about updating skills, you are sadly mistaken.I also think we deserve the MOUS Logo!!!! |
| 6/16/01: Anonymous says: |
To Anonymous we are not whinning about updating our skills it is about the lack of notification. Also if you would have read the article on the mous website it clearly states their is not a logo for the MI. So I don't know where you get the idea the logo is being updated. We should have a logo that we can use on our business cards. The above comment about testing centers being harrased is right on the mark. The one I work for receive e-mails daily on purchasing additional exams. Nivo is more concerned with selling exams instead of getting the new MI program rolling. I have yet to receive an e-mail either on the cancellation of the AI program. I sent e-mails to the AI program and never received any response. |
| 6/16/01: Anonymous says: |
I think many have forgotten that before the MOUS AI program even existed, the highest MOUS certification was the MOUS Master. I remember that back then that MOUS Masters couldn't use the MOUS logo. Later, the MOUS AI was born and a new logo came along with it that allowed MOUS AIs to use it. I think this will be the case for the MOUS Master Instructor program. I think we must be patient. With regard to the bad timing and bad notification, I agree with that completely. Hopefully Microsoft/Nivo could come to some sort of compromise since the existing situation is unethical on their part. |
| 6/17/01: Anonymous says: |
Lets hope Microsoft/Nivo will develop a logo for the Master Instructor to use on business cards. The timimg was terrible, usually when you are ready to retire a program you have 1 ready to go in its place. I have sent numerous e-mails and have yet to receive a response. Looks like the program will not be ready by July 1st. My superiors are not happy with all of this uncertaining and are serouisly considering doing away with their MOUS training program and the MOUS staff. Thank you Microsoft/Nivo |
| 6/17/01: Joseph says: |
I believe the main problem is basically "betting the bank" on "proposed changes" rather than what is actually implemented. The most important thing is to pass the new exams (Access 2000 Core, Excel 2000 Expert, PowerPoint Core, Word 2000 Expert, Outlook 2000 Core). That much is understandable. At least you'll have all the certifications for Office 2000 Professional completed and no one can question that. The logo usage doesn't prove anything. The logo usage just helps in self-promotion, that's all. Your name stamped on the certificates proves your competency. Whenever you interview with a CTEC all they care about is what you've actually passed. They never see the logos. They look for the list of certifications you've earned. |
| 6/17/01: Anonymous says: |
In regards to Joseph the logo draws an immediate attention to a business card/resume. I know from experience that when their are several applicants a logo can make a big difference. Do you use the logo from your MCT, MCSE, CCNA, etc? If so then don't say the logo is not important. |
| 6/18/01: Mighty says: |
Just checked the site again (June 19). In the section about application fees and logos it still says, "Further updates will be posted on this site as they become available, please check back soon." I've been 'checking back soon' for over a month now and something in the back of my head tells me that we're going to get our pocketbooks nailed on this one. When you change a program like this, the pricing structure is one of the first things that has to be set, so as to determine/estimate financial feasibility. Nivo/Microsoft know the cost - they're just putting off the inevitable and deserved waves of protest they'll receive when the numbers ($$) and 'legalese' is made public. I hope I’m dead wrong but… |
| 6/22/01: Joseph says: |
I absolutely use the logo if I can. If not, its indicated as part of my name as you can see. As I mentioned earlier, the logo usage aids in advertising your skills but not having the logo usage rights doesn't mean you're not certified. That was the point I was trying to make. I too wish Microsoft/Nivo will allow Office2K instructors to use the logo (or a new one) just like they did when they created the MOUS AI program. I still believe Microsoft/Nivo will eventually allow this, most likely a new logo will be created. In the meantime, since most ISPs allows some web space of your own for free, why not create your own website and indicate it on your promotional material (business cards, stationary)? Most ISPs though prohibit business websites so you may need to consider getting a domain name and maintain your own business website. |
| 6/22/01: Rob says: |
Joseph, if you read the FAQs about the MOUS AI retirement you will see that it also states that we cannot use the term MOUS AI. So, we are not only denied the right to use the logo but we may not call ourselves 'MOUS Authorised Instructors' either. Perhaps we should put 'Used to be a MOUS AI' after our names. Would that prevent Microsoft's legal department from suing us? (remember zey know who ve are und ver ve live) |
| 6/23/01: Joseph says: |
Yes, unfortunately, as of July 1, 2001 we can no longer even do that, at least until Microsoft/Nivo implement their new rules and regulations. Perhaps the following example may be better: "John Smith, Certified Instructor". This avoids any contract violation with any vendor. Then, you can just briefly describe it: "Microsoft Office 2000, Windows 2000, etc." I agree it's annoying but voicing our opinions is what helps vendors change their policies. Let's keep it up! It worked to for the MOUS AI, so let's work to make it work for the MOUS MI! |
First Page Previous Page Next Page Last Page
|
|
|
|
