CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
"
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  e-Book Shop
  Practice Exams
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Chicago Hotels
Madeira Beach FL Hotels
Paris France Hotels
Mississauga Hotels
Clearwater FL Hotels
Cape Canaveral FL Hotels
Atlanta Hotels
Jensen Beach FL Hotels
St. Petersburg Hotels
Lubbock Hotels

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Monday: January 10, 2005



The New TechMentor Register Early and Save!
  • 6 New Tracks
  • Exam Discounts
  • Year-End Savings
Register by
March 4th
and save $200 off
the new TechMentor!

* REGISTERED USERS ONLY

MOUS AI To Become MOUS Master Instructor


5/22/2001 -- Microsoft has decided to replace the MOUS AI program with a new certification: MOUS Master Instructor.

The new title will be a part of the existing MOUS Master program and, as such, will have the same exam requirements as the current MOUS Master:

MOUS Master 97 Instructor

  • Microsoft Word 97 Expert
  • Microsoft Excel 97 Expert
  • Microsoft Access 97 Expert
  • Microsoft PowerPoint 97 Expert

MOUS Master 2000 Instructor

  • Microsoft Word 2000 Expert
  • Microsoft Excel 2000 Expert
  • Microsoft Access 2000
  • Microsoft PowerPoint 2000
  • Microsoft Outlook 2000

Previously, AI candidates were required to pass two MOUS exams in their track, as well as meet the program's education requirements. According to Bruce Reemsnyder, senior director of Strategic Accounts for Nivo International (the organization that manages the MOUS program for Microsoft), the new title will have similar educational requirements as AI -- the increased number of exams is the major difference.

"Our Master program is the highest-level [MOUS certification] we offer. It was pointed out to us by both instructor and our partners that some of the students were certified at a higher level than the instructors [because some students were master level]," he explained. "It makes sense that our instructor should have the highest-level certification."

"Blending the concepts seemed to be the natural evolution of AI," he continued. "This new program will offer an increased ROI for participants and in turn a new challenge. We have raised the bar for instructors and the student will continue to benefit through a continuously improving classroom experience."

Reemsnyder told CertCities that current MOUS AIs can use their titles and logos until June 30 of this year -- the date by which AIs would normally need to renew their certification. At that time, the MOUS AI program will be retired, and candidates will need to apply to become MOUS Master Instructors.

Fees for the new program have yet to be worked out, although Reemsnyder said that significant discounts will be given to those previously MOUS certified.

According to Reemsnyder, complete details of the new program will be published on the MOUS Web site within the next two weeks, which would give current MOUS AIs just one month to turn around an application for the new program before their current title expires. New candidates who had attempted to apply to the MOUS AI program during the past few weeks will be on hold until the new certification is implemented.

One such candidate is Eileen Kelly, who found out about the retirement of the MOUS AI last week when she attempted to apply for the program.

At that time, Kelly was only told that the MOUS AI program was being discontinued, which caused her considerable frustration. "Over the last two months I have spent nearly 1500GBP on exam fees, travel and accommodation, study materials, and the recognized Train The Trainer Course and Video assessment," she told CertCities. "In addition to this there is the amount of study time required to pass the Expert exams. Knowing that this expense was for nothing is painful."

When told the about the new program by CertCities, Kelly said that the retirement makes more sense to her now, but that she still isn't happy with the changes. "I am obviously frustrated that the work and expense I put into the MOUS AI program did not deliver any benefits, but at least it wasn't totally wasted. I had intended to progress to Master certification anyway, but the delay will cause me considerable inconvenience," she said.

"The main reason I’m angry at whoever is responsible (be it Microsoft or Nivo) is the fact they gave us no forewarning, letting people continue to pursue this accreditation."

When asked about the short notice given candidates, Reemsnyder replied that he understands the frustration this has caused some MOUS AIs, adding "I wish we could have come out with the details sooner."

As stated above, information on the new MOUS Master Instructor title will be published on the MOUS.net Web site within the next two weeks, and Microsoft has indicated that current MOUS AIs will also receive individual notification via e-mail.

CertCities will report any further details here as they become known. - B.N.

UPDATE (5/24/01): Microsoft/Nivo have published a FAQ about the MOUS AI/MOUS Master Instructor transition on its Web site. Click here to access.



There are 85 CertCities.com user Comments for “MOUS AI To Become MOUS Master Instructor”
Page 7 of 9
6/1/01: Annette says: There are no expert levels for PowerPoint and Access as there were in Office 97. If you pass these in Office 2000 will you be authorized to teach the more advanced functions. It seems that if I passed these in Office 97 that I would be more qualified to instruct Access and PowerPoint.
6/1/01: Anonymous says: Nivo just posted the experience requirements (education degree, train the trainer course, two (2) or more years of employment delivering competent training on Microsoft Office applications or an instructor completion certificate form another vendor (Lotus, Novell, etc). I think this is more than fair for a requirment.
6/1/01: Anonymous says: MI should stand for Mission Impossible!
6/1/01: Joe says: Good instructors teach because they love it. Their motivation is no different than grade school teachers. There is more money to be gained as an MIS Director or Network Security Engineer! That's why if you're passionate about teaching, the steps to get there are irrelevant.
6/1/01: Dave says: Note that they have changed the TTT to completed rather than attended. You now have to PASS the TTT. This is same requirement for MCT. With regard to the logo, if you pass one MCP course you can use the Certified professional logo, yet if you pass all five MOUS you can't. Seems a bit unfair. How do we advertise on paper or the web - scan in our "wallet card" TIME FOR AN "UNOFFICIAL" LOGO
6/2/01: Anonymous says: I agree with Joe that if you are passionate about teaching you will take the steps in order to get there. Looking at the psoted comments a lot of you have made it is obivious that anyone who is complaining has not been a teacher in a K-12 and not had to renew your certificate by taking additional classes. In reference to Dave Kelly on the passing the TTT, would you want to take a course with someone who did not pass the course but is suppose to be teaching you how to pass an exam. Several of you are forgetting that the AI agreement expires on June 30, 2001. It is not a sign up 1 time and have it for life. Anyone who truly wants to be a Master Instructor will pass the required exams and meet the requirments as described in the new program. If you would put half as much energy into working to meet the requirments as you do about complaining then you would be eligable for the new program. Certifications are not for life, they only exists until they are retired. If you don't want to meet the new requirments to be an instructor/educator, then you are in the wrong line of business. Great educators always want to improve themselves.
6/3/01: Anonymous says: dear annonymous the majority of AIs did not instruct on anything other than Word and Excel (which they were experts in) they have made it plain on this page that they did not claim to know or teach the other aspects nor was there any need for them to do so (no market) they could not claim to be authorised instructors for appications they were not qualified for, this was written in the contract. IMPLICATION IN THE AI PROGRAM WAS THAT IT WOULD CONTINUE (AS IS STATED ON THE WEB PAGE) WITH MEMBERS BEING EXPECTED TO UPDATE THEMSELVES. The implication was also that it would mean updating to the latest versions of their applications NOT LEARNING NEW APPLICATIONS which have no relevance to their role as instructors. As i have stated before THEY NEED TIME 30 days is not enough . This K-12 program you keep prattling on about probably has adequate notice given and if it has been going for a while and i bet that experienced members have time off for study built into their work schedule to conform with the update release schedule. I also suspect that you would be expected to update with something related to your area not learn something entirely new and unrelated. You are right Great educators do want to improve themselves however it would be nice to know in what direction we are supposed to aim, you may be a genius able to recognise this direction without any hints or preparation however the rest of us are just normal, (i myself have only got a british university degree in pure maths, a diploma in teachin, an engineering Certificate and odd diplomas in technology including Databases but i am obviously not as clever as you since you seem to be able to read the minds of the idiots at microsoft and be prepared)I was always willing to pay to re register (I have the Master qualification by the way) and i am always willing to improve myself. You owe us an apology.
6/3/01: Dave says: With reference to the above comment, I was not implying that the change to the TTT was a bad thing on the contrary. The requirements for MI and MCT should be equal. This will hopefully alleviate the problem of companies preferring MCT's to train on desktop products they are not required to be certified in.
6/3/01: Anonymous says: With reference to Anonymos with the British education. Being a teacher you do not have off time or time built into your schedule. Several people seem to think that being a teacher you have a lot of time off to do several other things when in reality you do not. Educators may get a days would be lucky to get a months notice for upcoming changes. You need to reread the agreement. If you are so anti-Microsoft then get out. It amazes me several people love to critize Microsoft but are willing to make a fast buck off of them. The previous anynomous does not owe the apology you are the one who owes the apology to everyone else . Leave the arrogant attitude at the door.
6/3/01: Anonymous says: 1 thing to remember is that certification programs change. When new requirments are implemented you either change with them or you do not have that certification again. If you look at other vendors certification, they give you little time to meet the new requirments. Changes did need to be made to the program in order for it to grow.
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page

Want to post a comment under this article? Please register. It's free, it's easy, and you'll only need to register once to access all of CertCities.com's exam reviews, tips articles, the ability to post under articles, and more. Click on the button below to start your registration,or read our FAQ if you'd like more information.
Already registered? Log in here:
User Name:
Password:
Remember me on this computer
" Forgot User Name/Password

top

Sponsored Links:
MeasureUp Practice Tests On Sale: Get your A+, MCDST, MCSA, or MCSE!
Free Authorized Cisco eLearning: from Global Knowledge
TechMentor is Back in Orlando with 6 New Tracks: April 4-8, 2005
Keep Current on Microsoft News: Subscribe to Redmond Report Newsletter
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!



Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Copyright 1996-2005 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications