CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
"
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  e-Book Shop
  Practice Exams
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Mulberry FL Hotels
Saint Augustine Hotels
San Diego Hotels
Arlington Hotels
Queensland Hotels
South Lake Tahoe Hotels
Homosassa FL Hotels
Bradenton FL Hotels
Hungary Hotels
Bakersfield Hotels

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Features ..Feature Story Monday: January 10, 2005



The New TechMentor Register Early and Save!
  • 6 New Tracks
  • Exam Discounts
  • Year-End Savings
Register by
March 4th
and save $200 off
the new TechMentor!

* REGISTERED USERS ONLY

About Those U.S. Government Security Clearances...
U.S. security clearances are one of the most sought after qualifications for security jobs today, but they're also extremely hard to come by. Here's the basic facts about how the process works, as well as scams to watch out for.

by Dian Schaffhauser

3/10/2004 -- You've found a job whose description fits you perfectly except for one small matter: It requires a U.S. security clearance, and you don't have one. As with many things in life, getting this particular position would be a long shot for you, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't try anyway.

The fact is that security clearance is something you can't obtain for yourself. Your current or prospective employer has to set the wheels in motion to get it for you. Since the process is costly and time-consuming, organizations won't do it unless it's absolutely essential. Let's review the basics.

You typically need a security clearance when you hold a sensitive position within the federal government or when you work for a government contractor or some other organization that has access to classified information or deal with other restricted information relating to national security. Clearances come in many different flavors, primarily confidential, secret, top secret and sensitive compartmented information (SCI).

Up until the beginning of October 2003, the Department of Defense ran its own security clearance operation. Now that's been handed over to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).

Once a person has been offered a position that requires a clearance, the employer opens up a request with the OPM through a federal security officer. The OPM gives the candidate undergoing the clearance check access to an online system called e-Qip, or Electronic Questionnaire for Investigations Processing, a digital version of Standard Form 86.

SF 86 is a 13-page document that asks you to list your vitals-name, social security number, place of birth, etc., and then drills down on your personal history going back at least seven years. (To see a PDF edition of the form, go here). You're expected to list where you've lived for the last seven years, where you went to school, your employment activities -- including titles, supervisor names and supervisor addresses -- people who know you well aside from spouses and relatives, relatives and associates (along with their dates of birth, country of birth and current address), your military history and foreign activities (including travel for business and pleasure), police records, medical records, financial records and delinquencies, use of illegal drugs and alcohol, and groups you associate with that espouse the violent overthrow of the government.

Sound comprehensive? The idea is to weed out those who aren't, according to SF 86, "reliable, trustworthy, of good conduct and character, and loyal to the United States." The same form also warns that your current employer will be contacted and questioned, whether you want them to be or not.

Your form and your fingerprints then go to the Federal Investigations Processing Center, which calls on investigators, both federal employees and contract, to start confirming what you've said on the form. During this phase of the process, investigators review available records (including your presence on the Internet), check with the police, run a credit check on your and talk to people who know you -- those you've listed on the form as well as people in a position to observe you, such as neighbors. Plus, you'll be interviewed yourself.

All the data that's collected ends up in a single file, called "The Report of Investigation," which is sent to the federal agency that asked for the investigation in the first place. At that point, it's up to the federal security officer at the agency of hire to determine your eligibility to have a position with access to secure information. You may get the chance to explain or refute negative or unclear information during this "adjudication phase." Then your clearance is either granted or denied.

If it's granted, the fun doesn't stop there. Depending on what level of clearance you have, you'll have to undergo reinvestigation every five, 10 or 15 years. If you leave that position, the clearance is still active, but it may not be usable by your next employer depending on what type of security clearance the new job requires. Let enough time pass and the clearance will have no merit at all. The next time around you'll have to start at the beginning again. You can't simply request a renewal of your security clearance. You have to be employed in a position in which it's required.

The whole process of obtaining a clearance can take many months -- sometimes longer than a year -- and cost several thousands (even tens of thousands) of dollars. The more sensitive the job, the deeper -- and the costlier and more time-consuming -- the investigation. You can't speed up the effort, nor can you offer to pay the cost. That's why so many jobs listing security clearance as a requirement are anxious to find candidates who already possess a clearance of the right type -- the project may be over by the time somebody new to the process obtains his or her clearance. If you've noticed the propensity of government contractors to intensely recruit ex-military people for open positions, it's because vets frequently come with the security clearance that's needed as part of their portfolio.

Recruiting firms, attorneys or other companies that promise for a fee to obtain a security clearance for you or "pre-approve" you for a security clearance are scams. Don't fall for their antics.

If you don't already have a security clearance but there's a particular organization you're determined to work for, your best approach is to obtain employment that doesn't require the clearance with the agency or firm. Then put in your time and make it clear to your manager that should the right opportunity present itself, you'd be willing to undergo the investigation. But temper your enthusiasm. Too much eagerness to undergo this in-depth exploration into your personal and professional life might be viewed as suspicious behavior.

Originally published in Dec. 2003 as part of "CertCities.com's Security Certificaiton Resource Guide," available for download (PDF format) here.


Dian Schaffhauser is the editorial director of Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine, CertCities.com, TCPMag.com and ENTmag.com. She can be reached at .


There are 64 CertCities.com user Comments for “About Those U.S. Government Security Clearances...”
Page 5 of 7
4/26/04: Decipher says: Anon 4/23/04: You're either: a) Full of it b) Lying and never had a clearance c) Not skilled enough in IT related fields d) Not willing to move to where the work is If you hold that clearance, which you say you do, have a degree and 20 years of experience and can't find a job...maybe you should have taken some resume and interview courses. Point blank, I think you're lying and are full of crap. There's no way someone with the pedigree is unemployed now, no way. Decipher
4/28/04: David from Metro, DC says: Having a clearance is not a golden key to a new job, but it sure helps. Check out the differences in pay for non-cleared jobs listed on say Monster.com to similar jobs listed on security-cleared only job boards like ClearanceJobs.com. The salary differences seem to be as much as $12k or more higher for the cleared positions.
4/28/04: Train w/ Decipher from Florida says: I agree with Ciph, if you have all that you say you have, then you should be making at least over $100k a year.....cmonnnnn. Check Washingtonpost.com for jobs!
5/5/04: Sam Sabet says: All, As an Air Force Veteran, with a former TS and Secret clearances, I had never had the 2 year break in the last 27 years...but last Jan 2003, when rolling on to a new project that is designated "Public Trust", unclassified access, they questioned my place of birth. After I answered, they said my last investigation is too old and I need a new one! I just came off a public trust position that I held for 2 years, and another before that for 2 years, and the Air Force prior to that! (with a secret). I answered that they would be correct if I required a secret access (every ten years), but not for a low level public trust with no access to classified info. I was met with hostility and complete discrimination (I'm Arab - American). I filled out the SF-85P anyway, and they violated my privacy when we asked for interim access. There reply was for me to go to Equifax.com and run a 3 in 1 credit report, and send it to the security officer at DISA, I had disclosed on my SF-85P some past credit problems, which is OK now...of course I refused, and stated that they are not OPM investigators, and that I signed for the Gov. to obtain my credit report., and how are you aware of my answers on the SF-85P? Again, complete hostility..and refusal of interim access. Almost a year transpired, with investigators meeting with me 3 times, and wanted a 4th meeting... I resigned my position, and will never answer the place of birth question again...Uncle Sam knows damn well where I was born, this is just another tool of discrimination. Yes people United We Stand...but Divided we fall...why was I divided? How in the world are we going to win the war against terrorism if we can't trust long serving Arab American such as myself? We both lose... Sam Sabet
5/5/04: Decipher says: Why put up such a front if the position was important to you. If you wanted the job, then the least you could do was to give them the credit report. I don't look at what their doing as hostility, they are doing their job. Because guess who would be the first to get blamed if you did end up selling secrets, that's right, the investigator who granted you the clearance. You may think you were discriminated against, but you also didn't do what they asked. If I was the investigator, I would have questioned your motives as well. You supposedly held a clearance so you should know full well why they were asking for what they did. It was your decision to put up the front, not theirs. Decipher
5/5/04: Yada from DC says: I'm applying for a F86 secret clearance. The only record I might have is from when i was 15 years old. I'm 25 now. Don't remember if it came out as a felony or not. Do I have to mention things done as a minor.
5/6/04: Sam Sabet says: Decipher states I should have cooperated with a contractor assigned to DISA as a Security Officer, who is NOT an OPM investigator. OK, just roll over your beliefs because "job important to you". No job is so important that I stop being an American, and a combat veteran. You see decipher, I EARNED and DEMAND respect in the same manner that you admonished another for " not ever wearing the uniform". Well to you sir I ask this...is it important to you that we identify, recruit and train people who speak Arabic and can blend in with a middle eastern culture?...it is to me...why..because I understand the Arab mind, and I want to help win the war. When you treat us like this...we just move on...guess you never heard of the Privacy Act of 1974, nor DoD Directive 5200.2R. I recommend that everyone ignore decipher and his answers. Oh, I know many people with clearances who are out of work (just pull up a chair at my VFW post) and many others who dream of making a hundred grand a year! I worked for a MAJOR software company for 3 years, and only made half that! One more thing decipher... IYAAYAS...look that up...and learn...and maybe you'll get a small inkling of why I have an attitude dude...loyalty is a 2 way street. Everyone else...if you want correct information, look up the regs I quoted already, and DSS.com
5/6/04: Decipher says: Really Sammy. If you looked at a lot of forums on this site, you will see that I have provided the information you seem to think I don't know. You see Sammy, I still hold my clearance and I'm entrusted with the system administration, network security, and project management of the IT infrastructure in one of the single most important strategic sites the United States has. Don't even begin to try and preach to me, and others who have been on this site for some time now, that I don't know what I'm talking about. I too am a veteran. I started out as a 98c serving with the 101st Airborne doing tactical low-level voice intercept. I then worked in a field station doing intel, I/O, system admin, and network security. Face it, you're just a malcontent. I too can go spouting off at the mouth and direct people to look at hate-based websites and quote a few directives and government websites that any layman can lookup online. However, I have the credibility to the extent that I don't have to. If clowns like you would stop crying over every little thing regarding your clearance applications, our investigators would have a lot more time searching for those that really are corrupt. That's fine by me that you want to piss and moan, it's just one less candidate to compete with while moving up the chain. Now, Sammy, do you wish to continue to piss and moan because this is quite humerous.
5/6/04: Decipher says: Humorous not humerous. Sorry everyone, just got to typing a bit fast. By the way, Sammy, I've helped over 10 people actually find work within the defense contractor world. Hmmmmmm, how many people have you found jobs for?
5/6/04: rflemen says: Hell...I have to submit credit reports and fill out bullcrap paperwork constantly for my job and it is not even government related and does not require clearance....SO Sammy please cry somewhere else...stop playing the race card as well...if you want the job you submit to the same process everyone else goes through nothing more nothing less. By not cooperating you opened your self up to further questioning. Ultimately you screwed yourself. They are PLENTY of good, decent, patriotic, AMERICA loving Arabs in the United States who love this country and will glady take the job you foolishly gave up on.
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page

Want to post a comment under this article? Please register. It's free, it's easy, and you'll only need to register once to access all of CertCities.com's exam reviews, tips articles, the ability to post under articles, and more. Click on the button below to start your registration,or read our FAQ if you'd like more information.
Already registered? Log in here:
User Name:
Password:
Remember me on this computer
" Forgot User Name/Password

top

Sponsored Links:
MeasureUp Practice Tests On Sale: Get your A+, MCDST, MCSA, or MCSE!
Free Authorized Cisco eLearning: from Global Knowledge
TechMentor is Back in Orlando with 6 New Tracks: April 4-8, 2005
Keep Current on Microsoft News: Subscribe to Redmond Report Newsletter
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!



Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Copyright 1996-2005 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications