CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Check Out the 10 Hottest Certifications for 2005!
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on Redmondmag.com!
" Cover Story: SA Exposed
" 6 Reasons To Consider Apache
" Exchange Storage Rules
" 7 Terminal Services Tips
" Your Turn: MOM 2005 Feels the Love

CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Anacapri Hotels
Les Issambres Hotels
Thompson Hotels
Germany Hotels
Altea Hills Hotels
Zug Hotels
Stettler Hotels
Grand Canyon Hotels
Regina Hotels
Truro Hotels

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Features ..Feature Story Monday: March 28, 2005

The New TechMentor Register Early and Save!
Download
Conference
Brochure

Click here to download the TechMentor Orlando 2005 brochure!
April 4 - 8
Orlando, FL

-- advertisement --
Free white papers, case studies, research and more for the IT Manager:

Blade Systems Move into the Mainstream

Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance

StorageWorks for E-mail Retention

Policy-based Data Management

IT Service Management


About Those U.S. Government Security Clearances...
U.S. security clearances are one of the most sought after qualifications for security jobs today, but they're also extremely hard to come by. Here's the basic facts about how the process works, as well as scams to watch out for.

by Dian Schaffhauser

3/10/2004 -- You've found a job whose description fits you perfectly except for one small matter: It requires a U.S. security clearance, and you don't have one. As with many things in life, getting this particular position would be a long shot for you, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't try anyway.

The fact is that security clearance is something you can't obtain for yourself. Your current or prospective employer has to set the wheels in motion to get it for you. Since the process is costly and time-consuming, organizations won't do it unless it's absolutely essential. Let's review the basics.

You typically need a security clearance when you hold a sensitive position within the federal government or when you work for a government contractor or some other organization that has access to classified information or deal with other restricted information relating to national security. Clearances come in many different flavors, primarily confidential, secret, top secret and sensitive compartmented information (SCI).

Up until the beginning of October 2003, the Department of Defense ran its own security clearance operation. Now that's been handed over to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).

Once a person has been offered a position that requires a clearance, the employer opens up a request with the OPM through a federal security officer. The OPM gives the candidate undergoing the clearance check access to an online system called e-Qip, or Electronic Questionnaire for Investigations Processing, a digital version of Standard Form 86.

SF 86 is a 13-page document that asks you to list your vitals-name, social security number, place of birth, etc., and then drills down on your personal history going back at least seven years. (To see a PDF edition of the form, go here). You're expected to list where you've lived for the last seven years, where you went to school, your employment activities -- including titles, supervisor names and supervisor addresses -- people who know you well aside from spouses and relatives, relatives and associates (along with their dates of birth, country of birth and current address), your military history and foreign activities (including travel for business and pleasure), police records, medical records, financial records and delinquencies, use of illegal drugs and alcohol, and groups you associate with that espouse the violent overthrow of the government.

Sound comprehensive? The idea is to weed out those who aren't, according to SF 86, "reliable, trustworthy, of good conduct and character, and loyal to the United States." The same form also warns that your current employer will be contacted and questioned, whether you want them to be or not.

Your form and your fingerprints then go to the Federal Investigations Processing Center, which calls on investigators, both federal employees and contract, to start confirming what you've said on the form. During this phase of the process, investigators review available records (including your presence on the Internet), check with the police, run a credit check on your and talk to people who know you -- those you've listed on the form as well as people in a position to observe you, such as neighbors. Plus, you'll be interviewed yourself.

All the data that's collected ends up in a single file, called "The Report of Investigation," which is sent to the federal agency that asked for the investigation in the first place. At that point, it's up to the federal security officer at the agency of hire to determine your eligibility to have a position with access to secure information. You may get the chance to explain or refute negative or unclear information during this "adjudication phase." Then your clearance is either granted or denied.

If it's granted, the fun doesn't stop there. Depending on what level of clearance you have, you'll have to undergo reinvestigation every five, 10 or 15 years. If you leave that position, the clearance is still active, but it may not be usable by your next employer depending on what type of security clearance the new job requires. Let enough time pass and the clearance will have no merit at all. The next time around you'll have to start at the beginning again. You can't simply request a renewal of your security clearance. You have to be employed in a position in which it's required.

The whole process of obtaining a clearance can take many months -- sometimes longer than a year -- and cost several thousands (even tens of thousands) of dollars. The more sensitive the job, the deeper -- and the costlier and more time-consuming -- the investigation. You can't speed up the effort, nor can you offer to pay the cost. That's why so many jobs listing security clearance as a requirement are anxious to find candidates who already possess a clearance of the right type -- the project may be over by the time somebody new to the process obtains his or her clearance. If you've noticed the propensity of government contractors to intensely recruit ex-military people for open positions, it's because vets frequently come with the security clearance that's needed as part of their portfolio.

Recruiting firms, attorneys or other companies that promise for a fee to obtain a security clearance for you or "pre-approve" you for a security clearance are scams. Don't fall for their antics.

If you don't already have a security clearance but there's a particular organization you're determined to work for, your best approach is to obtain employment that doesn't require the clearance with the agency or firm. Then put in your time and make it clear to your manager that should the right opportunity present itself, you'd be willing to undergo the investigation. But temper your enthusiasm. Too much eagerness to undergo this in-depth exploration into your personal and professional life might be viewed as suspicious behavior.

Originally published in Dec. 2003 as part of "CertCities.com's Security Certificaiton Resource Guide," available for download (PDF format) here.


Dian Schaffhauser is the editorial director of Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine, CertCities.com, TCPMag.com and ENTmag.com. She can be reached at .

There are 67 CertCities.com user Comments for “About Those U.S. Government Security Clearances...”
Page 6 of 7
5/6/04: Matthew Poteraj from Denver says: I am applying for a position with Fiber Optic Services in Costa Rica. I get a little skepticle when anyone asks for money prior to an employment contract. Does anyone know if this is a reputable firm and if the 237 they are asking for will get a 'good' security clearance and should I expect a copy of any info discovered by them? Thanks for the response '[email protected]'
5/7/04: Decipher says: Matthew, I've never seen a company ask you for money to get a clearance. Quite frankly, they can't. It's the company's responsibility to get the clearance for any potential employee. Plus, it should never cost you to join a company other than your time. I would never trust this organization that asks for money up front so that you can work for them. What kind of nonsense is that. Stay away from this one, looks very suspicious to me. Decipher
5/7/04: Decipher says: Might I also add that $237.00 doesn't even come close to paying for a clearance.
5/7/04: Wildcat-Dude from Southern US - Air Force Vet Vietnam 69-70 says: Interesting discussions I must say. While I feel somewhat inclined to support a fellow Air Force Vet (regardless where you came from), I think maybe the project manager may have been the one to initially "step" on your toes, but he pushed your button and you reacted. He got the results he wanted or enough response to indicate that he better not take chances and he CAN make the decision to request or require a new background check. 9-11 made a lot of folks nervous and nobody wants to or is going to take any chances. All it takes for the gov't to squeeze you out, is you don't want to play by their rules. All of us who were in the military know that much and you should have, except you got offended. You should know by now that anything the gov't wants to check to limit your access, they will. Pure and simple, either play by their rules or you're out. When they say jump, your response is to say "how high" without hesitation. Once you're position to influence someone else, then its your turn to tell someone else to jump. And I also caught that, an RN, just exactly what are you doing in an IT forum? Stirring up trouble? You know your views can also be used against you for holding clearances, anything that's perceived to be a risk factor. If I was the person responsible, just based on your comments so far, I'd consider you a risk that I'm not willing to accept.
5/8/04: Anonymous says: Does anyone have experience or advice about bankruptcy? I had to file for (personal) bankruptcy in 2000 and had all my debts discharged. I am currently debt-free and rebuilding a credit history. I have a great, well-paying job but need to get re-investigated for clearance. My Secret clearance was given in 1991 and it lapsed without being reinvestigated. Like I said, I'm going to submit the paperwork (with the truth) for Secret and possibly Top Secret clearance, but wanted to know how much that bankruptcy is going to impact me. I'd appreciate any and all responses.
5/9/04: Anonymous says: This website is obviously only intended for those people that reside in the USA. Maybe you should specifiy something in the home page that says, USA articles only or comments may offend those living in India etc...
5/11/04: gypsy moth says: I have been out of work for a year. Just over 6 months ago, I got an offer from a govt contractor that requires a clearance before I even start working for them. I knew it would take up to a year but was led to beleive that I'd get through the process rather quickly. Anyway, being underemployed, I continued to look for other jobs-Plan B jsut in case. Now it turns out I'm getting a lot of interviews and prospects in my field. The contractor job is not in my first choice field of work, but at the time I had been looking for 8 months and did not want to risk being out of work for even longer. If I got another job in my field and then a few months later the clearance goes through, is it a bad thing to turn down the clearance and the job since they are so expensive to come by? I am afraid that if I work in the field of the contractor for a while, I won't be able to go back to my first choice line of work.
5/11/04: Becky Nagel from Editor, CertCities.com says: Okay, the thread with the back-and-forth needs to end now guys -- gotten way past the off-topic here. I'm removing some of the later posts in order to try to bring the entire thread back on focus. Thank you.
5/11/04: Decipher says: Understood Becky. However, I was just starting to get to know Sammy:)
5/11/04: Anonymous says: Having being bankrupted in your past does not make you a security threat, they might like to know the details of why you were bankrupted. But my security clearence mainly wanted to know where my currently earned money was going to and how often I paid off my credit card etc...
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “About Those U.S. Government Security Clearances...”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

top

Sponsored Links:
$10,000 MCSE/CISCO Scholarship: offered to top techs throughout the US!
LAN/WAN Consultant Placement Camp: Guaranteed to get you eng/consulting gigs!
Free Authorized Cisco eLearning: from Global Knowledge
Adapting to Change - Blade Systems Move into the Mainstream:: Free White Paper
Attaining Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance: Free White Paper
Subscribe to Redmond magazine: It’s free and available in print or PDF!
Fresh Cisco White Papers: Get them now on TCPmag.com
MCSE Track, Free Study Guides, Trusted Speakers: TechMentor Orlando
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!




Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Copyright 1996-2005 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications