 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Greg Neilson
|
|
|
 |
 |
Hey Microsoft, Slow Down! |
It’s becoming very clear to me just how far ahead of the customer base Microsoft is pushing MCSEs to certify/recertify on the Windows 2000 platform. |
by Greg Neilson |
5/30/2001 -- I recently upgraded my MCSE certification to Windows 2000, and many of those on my staff are doing the same. However, only one of our clients is seriously working on a deployment at the moment, and in a couple of other cases we have some specially-built laptops with Win2K Professional as needed. That leaves us supporting a lot of Windows NT 4.0 Workstation and Server, and there is little prospect of this changing by the end of the year.
Yet look at the timing of Microsoft’s MCP program. NT 4.0 exams were no longer offered after February (remember, it was originally December 2000, but was extended because of the demands on the testing centers), and MCSEs have only the end of this year to complete their upgrade exam. As a manager planning the professional development of my staff, this is really starting to hurt -- I am being forced to educate staff in Win2K much faster than I would like so that they can retain their MCSE certification.
Like with most organizations, there is a limited amount of time and dollars allowed for education per employee, so I can either choose to blow my budget (a courageous move in these uncertain times!) or, instead, focus on MCSE education -- time I could be using to get them trained in other relevant technologies such as Oracle, SQL Server, Citrix MetaFrame, Linux or vendor server hardware. I don’t deny that I need a base of skilled Win2K professionals as it becomes more prevalent, but I don’t need my entire team skilled on Win2K right now! For most of my team it will probably be Windows 2002 where they finally get their hands dirty with in a production deployment.
I also have some younger, less experienced folk in my team who are moving from a desktop support and deployment role into server-based project work. They would be perfect candidates for NT 4.0 MCSE certification, and they could use the certification to measure the skills they had learned along the way. It is true that the NT 4.0 courses are still being taught, albeit on a drastically reduced timetable, but I really believe that by having people know upfront that they will have to (as is our department policy) pass a certification exam on the course topic afterwards, it ensures they concentrate on learning the material. I know BrainBench and others are still offering NT 4.0 certification, but my preference is for certification exams offered by Microsoft.
From the participants themselves, there also seems to be a degree of anger and resentment towards Microsoft at the hoops they are being forced to jump through to keep their MCSE. This isn’t just my guys – I notice the "Certified Mail"section in the June issue of MCP Magazine is flooded with angry people who aren’t happy about the MCSE re-certification process. I don’t think most people would begrudge having to do an upgrade exam, but it seems the majority have to do four exams (Win2K upgrade exam, design elective plus two further electives), which assumes that they pass the upgrade exam at their only attempt, otherwise they need to complete the entire seven exams in the Win2K stream.
For those of you unhappy about re-certifying at all, I understand the frustration, but I would caution you before you let this anger make your decision about whether or not you'll recertify. I’m not trying to push you either way, but you owe it to yourself and your future to consider the likely benefits and costs in keeping your certification current. Unless you plan on changing career direction in the short term, in time you are going to need to know this material anyway (and probably a great deal more, in truth) to be able to do your job when working with Win2K. Yes, the pace Microsoft set is pushing it, but in this case at least, having to prepare for and take the exams is more of an inconvenience than anything else -- you will use what you learn eventually.
Just for something different, I’ll be talking the LPI Linux Level 1 exams in the coming month (yes, I will be covering these exams for CertCities.com), so I’m looking at this as an opportunity to revise my general Unix skills plus as a structured way to improve my Linux skills. As you’ve probably heard, Windows NT/2000 and Linux are the only operating systems increasing their market share at the moment. I’m not pretending that the certification alone is going to mean anything much (especially to the hardened Linux crowd!), but I’m looking forward to getting my hands dirty and learning something new – and isn’t that why we started in this business anyway?
Is your organization facing the same situation? Post your thoughts on this column below!
|
Greg Neilson, MCSE+Internet, MCNE, PCLP, is a Contributing Editor for Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine and a manager at a large IT services firm in Australia. He's the author of Lotus Domino Administration in a Nutshell (O'Reilly and Associates, ISBN 1-56592-717-6). You can reach him at Attn: Greg.
|
|
|
 |
More articles by Greg Neilson:
|
There are 40 user Comments for “Hey Microsoft, Slow Down!”
|
Page 4 of 4
|
6/20/01: Kevin says: |
Microsoft is good at making money by market dominance. They take in over $100 for each certification test taken and profit about 20-30 bucks off each. There are over 1.5 million MCPs out there, and each has to take half a dozen tests or so to "upgrade" to MCSE 2k. Do the math: 1.5M x 100 x 6 = $900 Million. Any more questions? |
6/20/01: Glenn says: |
A comparison: After spending four+ years and thousands of dollars to attend a college and earn a BA degree, what would be the reaction and response if the college nullified all those degrees in one fell swoop because they changed their curriculum for BA then require former BA students to spend more time and money to take a new cram course to learn the new course of study loose it the degree. It is ashame so many let them selves be subjects of Microsoft's lies, deceit and fraud. Everyone who earned a MCSE NT must display MCSE4 label, whether you upgraded to 2000 or not. You earned NT4. Display it proudly; phooey on Microsoft. Where is government protection from consumer fraud when you finally need it? |
6/20/01: Jason says: |
I really think of the whole expiration policy a bit like my car mechanic. My mechanic has a A+ rating to fix cars, he has had this rating for years, yet how do I know he has the ability to fix my new car which is more computer than mechanic. His qualification becomes outdated and therefore I don't exactly know if I can trust it as much. If on the otherhand there was a method of either him requiring to renew his qualification or obtain qualification with a year attached to it, this would make me feel a lot more assured in his work. I could then assume he has had numerous field experience by viewing his progressive achievements or alternativly know that since he is still qualified in his A+ mechanic training that means he has stayed ahead of the rest in maintaining his knowledge. With regard to uni, uni is attached to the year you completed it in most cases, I would be comfortable if MS chose this path as well. |
6/21/01: Anonymous says: |
I feel that the market should drive the demand, not Microsoft. NT4 MCSE's should remain certified, and if their respecive employer wants them to work wih Windows 2000 technology, then they will need to upgrade. Eventually all will have to certify in windows 2000, but that should not be dictated by Microsoft. |
6/22/01: Dimitri. says: |
I feel that the market should drive the demand, not Microsoft. NT4 MCSE's should remain certified, and if their respecive employer wants them to work wih Windows 2000 technology, then they will need to upgrade. Eventually all will have to certify in windows 2000, but that should not be dictated by Microsoft. |
6/30/01: Andrea says: |
I paid $1800 for a package to study for my MCSE certification. Within 1 month, MS announced the end of the WIN NT4.0 certification. I think MS is a piece of crap and they are digging themselves an early grave. We are still using NT 4.0, Win 95, Win 98. We don't have the money to change all our computers. Win 2000 makes our computers run slow. Let MS do what they want, but they will not get another dime from me. |
9/8/01: erik says: |
I think the new Windows 2000 exams are twice as hard as the NT 4.0 exams. I think MS is trying to make there certification mean something again. NT 4.0 is tough as well but you could pass them with braindumps and a book. MCSE 2k is tougher..... |
9/8/01: Joe says: |
How long should a certification be valid? It's been over four years now for the Nt4.0 exams. I'm upgrading and I think the time is reasonable. |
9/18/01: Jeff says: |
I just obtained my NT 4.0 MCSE last November, and my original plan was to go ahead and take the "upgrade" exam to keep my certification current by the end of the year ... but I have since changed my mind. In my job, I work with NT 4.0. I am still learning new things about it all the time. We have six NT 4.0 servers, and we now have a single Windows 2000 server. I certainly plan to learn Windows 2000, but I will do so at MY own pace. I'm not going to cram for these exams and try to stuff all this information -- which I'll likely not even use on any widespread basis for some time to come -- into my head. I haven't decided yet whether to get the Win2K MCSE at all -- perhaps over 2002, at my own pace -- or whether to look into the new certifications Microsoft says it will offer next year. I am a systems administrator, and if they come out with a cert aimed at professionals like me, that may be a better fit anyway. In any case, I feel Microsoft's attempt to force NT 4.0 MCSEs into premature upgrading is downright shameful. |
1/14/03: David says: |
Thanks all for your comments. I just got my Net+ and CCNA. I had my A+ and I was thinking about whether I should go for the MCSA or the CCNP. I think my choice is clear. M$ is trying to ensnare even more victims with this new cert and I'm not going for the scam. When I do add an OS I think it will be Linux/UNIX based and I will stay far far away from the M$ money trap. Again, thanks for this article and your comments! |
First Page Previous Page Last Page
|
|
|
|