CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Free CertCities.com Newsletter via E-mail Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Columns ..Column Story Sunday: January 31, 2010
TechMentor Conferences


 Certification Advisor  
Greg Neilson
Greg Neilson


 Hey Microsoft, Slow Down!
It’s becoming very clear to me just how far ahead of the customer base Microsoft is pushing MCSEs to certify/recertify on the Windows 2000 platform.
by Greg Neilson  
5/30/2001 -- I recently upgraded my MCSE certification to Windows 2000, and many of those on my staff are doing the same. However, only one of our clients is seriously working on a deployment at the moment, and in a couple of other cases we have some specially-built laptops with Win2K Professional as needed. That leaves us supporting a lot of Windows NT 4.0 Workstation and Server, and there is little prospect of this changing by the end of the year.

Yet look at the timing of Microsoft’s MCP program. NT 4.0 exams were no longer offered after February (remember, it was originally December 2000, but was extended because of the demands on the testing centers), and MCSEs have only the end of this year to complete their upgrade exam. As a manager planning the professional development of my staff, this is really starting to hurt -- I am being forced to educate staff in Win2K much faster than I would like so that they can retain their MCSE certification.

Like with most organizations, there is a limited amount of time and dollars allowed for education per employee, so I can either choose to blow my budget (a courageous move in these uncertain times!) or, instead, focus on MCSE education -- time I could be using to get them trained in other relevant technologies such as Oracle, SQL Server, Citrix MetaFrame, Linux or vendor server hardware. I don’t deny that I need a base of skilled Win2K professionals as it becomes more prevalent, but I don’t need my entire team skilled on Win2K right now! For most of my team it will probably be Windows 2002 where they finally get their hands dirty with in a production deployment.

I also have some younger, less experienced folk in my team who are moving from a desktop support and deployment role into server-based project work. They would be perfect candidates for NT 4.0 MCSE certification, and they could use the certification to measure the skills they had learned along the way. It is true that the NT 4.0 courses are still being taught, albeit on a drastically reduced timetable, but I really believe that by having people know upfront that they will have to (as is our department policy) pass a certification exam on the course topic afterwards, it ensures they concentrate on learning the material. I know BrainBench and others are still offering NT 4.0 certification, but my preference is for certification exams offered by Microsoft.

From the participants themselves, there also seems to be a degree of anger and resentment towards Microsoft at the hoops they are being forced to jump through to keep their MCSE. This isn’t just my guys – I notice the "Certified Mail"section in the June issue of MCP Magazine is flooded with angry people who aren’t happy about the MCSE re-certification process. I don’t think most people would begrudge having to do an upgrade exam, but it seems the majority have to do four exams (Win2K upgrade exam, design elective plus two further electives), which assumes that they pass the upgrade exam at their only attempt, otherwise they need to complete the entire seven exams in the Win2K stream.

For those of you unhappy about re-certifying at all, I understand the frustration, but I would caution you before you let this anger make your decision about whether or not you'll recertify. I’m not trying to push you either way, but you owe it to yourself and your future to consider the likely benefits and costs in keeping your certification current. Unless you plan on changing career direction in the short term, in time you are going to need to know this material anyway (and probably a great deal more, in truth) to be able to do your job when working with Win2K. Yes, the pace Microsoft set is pushing it, but in this case at least, having to prepare for and take the exams is more of an inconvenience than anything else -- you will use what you learn eventually.

Just for something different, I’ll be talking the LPI Linux Level 1 exams in the coming month (yes, I will be covering these exams for CertCities.com), so I’m looking at this as an opportunity to revise my general Unix skills plus as a structured way to improve my Linux skills. As you’ve probably heard, Windows NT/2000 and Linux are the only operating systems increasing their market share at the moment. I’m not pretending that the certification alone is going to mean anything much (especially to the hardened Linux crowd!), but I’m looking forward to getting my hands dirty and learning something new – and isn’t that why we started in this business anyway?

Is your organization facing the same situation? Post your thoughts on this column below!


Greg Neilson, MCSE+Internet, MCNE, PCLP, is a Contributing Editor for Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine and a manager at a large IT services firm in Australia. He's the author of Lotus Domino Administration in a Nutshell (O'Reilly and Associates, ISBN 1-56592-717-6). You can reach him at Attn: Greg.

 


More articles by Greg Neilson:

-- advertisement --


There are 40 CertCities.com user Comments for “Hey Microsoft, Slow Down!”
Page 3 of 4
6/16/01: Anonymous says: I'm a slow learner and did not cram for my CNE or MCSE exams. I worked with the products in production environments for at least a year before I began taking the certification exams. I got through all my exams with good grades without ever attending a classroom. However, I have attended many seminars over the years. My point is that experience is important and that you need to work with the product to become truly proficient. We have hundreds of servers and as of today have only rolled out several in production. I doubt that I will have the enough production time on W2k before the MCSE deadline so I will wait until I'm prepared before testing. Microsoft should do like Novell did and recognize both the NT4 AND the W2K certifications. Why not? Many companies WILL still value the the MCSE and there is nothing wrong about telling an employer that you HAD an MSCE and ARE an NT 4 expert.Microsoft can't take that away from you because you earned it. So, you won't be able to put MCSE next to your signature after 12/31/2001,. You can still put it under your educational acheivements on your resume. What's the rush? Oh yeah, selling product that can be supported!
6/16/01: Henry says: I think we should slow down MCSE Cert doesnt mean you have the ability to administrate a live multi domain production network with the upcoming changes Microfoft have in store for us all it seem a shame to recertify every 2 to 3 years for this reason most of the folks I know are leaning to the CISCO field in hope for a bit more stability
6/16/01: Joseph says: The suddenness of the MCSE recertification requirements is indeed sad and I agree unfair. Cisco has a much fairer recertification: for example, when you earn your CCNA, you are immediately notified (also stated on the card) that you are certified for three years.
6/18/01: Pabloa says: How about if Microsoft refunds all the money we spent in the NT4.0 certification ? On a more serious note, how can they take certification away when the NT4.0 OS is still in use by many companies ?
6/18/01: Mike says: I agree with many people in our industry that Microsoft has to slow down. I have only been doing this for 3 years and have been an MCSE for 7 months. I work for a government contractor and for the most part I have to pay for my training. The thing that really upsets me is that Microsoft fails to realize that most of us have full time jobs and families. Balancing time and money in this econmy is going be a challenge. The MSCE NT 4.0 cert should not go away any more than my degree will go away. I think Microsoft will shoot itself in the foot as it continues to dump on its best sales force; The MCP's and MCSE's who support their product.
6/18/01: Marc says: I agree that since I am a MCSE 4.0 that I will always be MCSE 4.0. And there should be MCSE 5.0 and 6.0. Just because there is a new cert it does not mean that customers are upgrading...arrogant Microsoft...watch out if you piss us off like Novell did in the 90's were going to support Linux and kiss your servers good-by.
6/18/01: Brian says: In general, I think M$ has the right to do anything they darn well please with their certifications. The SOLE exception is when they talk out of both sides of their mouth, i.e. they claim certification maps to 1+ years of hands-on experience with the product in addition to a reasonably comprehensive middle-level understanding of the product. Given the time frame (heck, Network+ is supposed to map to 18 months experience!), how could anyone NOT on the technical beta be expected to posess those requirments by the time the NT4 exams retired? Remember, they extended the testing period to 2/28/01 - a year after Win2K finally shipped. I've been working with NT5, I mean Win2K, since 10/97 - but since when does M$ allow every MCSE candidate into the technical betas? I have an unfair advantage and I've used it, but what is everyone else supposed to do? It's nonsense, and M$ is doing revenue generation rather than value-building. I agree with the Level 4/5/6 MCSE certs, it's confusing but it's relevant.
6/19/01: dhana says: ple mcse 2k
6/19/01: Anonymous says: One needs a life. One cannot carry on on studying until there last breathe. Microsoft has allready made there billions. Who are we? MCSE's just an atom in an ocean.Microsoft has decided and one will not change Microsoft.
6/20/01: Anonymous says: I have recently passed the 70-240 Accelerated exam along with 2 of the design exams in order to keep my certification. At present my work as a technical implementor gives me little exposure to 2000 servers and I strongly agree that there should be separate certification paths fot both NT and W2K. It seems to me that Microsoft's primary concern is and always will be with making a huge profit. After all they proved that when they took away the free Technet subscription for newly certified MCSE's.
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “Hey Microsoft, Slow Down!”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

top