EXCLUSIVE: CompTIA Settles Suit Against Cheet-Sheets.com; Launches Industry "Security Council"
10/3/2001 -- The Computer Technology Industry Association (CompTIA) confirmed to CertCities.com last week that it has settled a copyright and trademark lawsuit against Keen Interactive, owners of the site Cheet-Sheets.com.
According to court documents, the suit was originally filed by CompTIA in both the Cook County State Court and the U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois (where it was eventually litigated) on May 21. It stemmed from allegations that Cheet-Sheets.com -- known for its advertising motto of "actual questions from actual tests" -- violated CompTIA's copyrights by selling questions that appear on CompTIA's A+ and other exams.
"We feel obliged to protect the integrity of our program," said Lutz Ziob, vice president of certification for CompTIA. "We also believe that as an industry association...we have a role to play."
Ziob told CertCities.com that Keen Interactive agreed to the following settlement terms:
- Destruction by Keen of all CompTIA-related materials in its possession.
- Disclosure of all customers who purchased CompTIA-related materials.
- Payment of undisclosed financial damages.
- A permanent injunction prohibiting Keen from using CompTIA's trademarks on its site.
Keen Interactive confirmed the settlement terms to CertCities.com, but the company otherwise declined to comment for this story, citing legal concerns. CompTIA materials have not been available on the Cheet-Sheets.com Web site for several months.
The settlement and injunction were filed with the court on Sept. 17. Days later, CompTIA sent a mass e-mail to Keen's customers asking them to either destroy the Cheet-Sheets in their possession or send them to CompTIA (reports vary as to the e-mail's content).
CompTIA said it sent the e-mail for two reasons. "We wanted to notify them [the recipients] that the information they received violates a whole slew of copyright and other laws, both at the state and federal level," Ziob explained. "We also wanted to stop them from disseminating the information further and opening themselves up [to] possible liability."
When asked if CompTIA was planning on taking any disciplinary actions against those who received the Cheet-Sheets, Ziob replied, "Absolutely not...There's no kind of judgment here." Ziob also said that so far the response to the e-mail has been mostly positive: "Many [people] thanked us for letting them know."
While this suit has been settled, future litigation may not be far off. Several certification programs whose tests are also covered by Cheet-Sheets.com materials confirmed to CertCities.com that they have been keeping an eye on this suit, including Microsoft and Prosoft Training.com. (Novell declined to comment.)
None would confirm whether they are considering legal action, but Microsoft's Director of Certification Skills and Assessment Anne Marie McSweeney issued the following statement to CertCities.com: "Microsoft is aware of the issues surrounding Cheet-Sheets.com. The value of certification resides in a given credential clearly representing a skill set and demonstrating that an individual has experience working with the technologies. Those companies and individuals who attempt to circumvent the normal process of earning a certification do a grave disservice to the industry and to themselves. Microsoft is committed to maintaining the integrity of the MCP program credentials and supports exam security across the high-tech industry."
As part of the commitment, Microsoft -- along with Novell, Prosoft, Vue, Prometric and other industry vendors -- has joined a "security council" started by CompTIA to address the issue of "braindump" sites as well as other industry concerns. CompTIA is scheduled to announce the new council officially next week. According to Fran Linhart, director of certification for CompTIA, the council is a joint effort with the Association of Test Publishers. Rob Pedigo, former director of Sun Microsystems' certification program, has been hired to run the program, Linhart said.
While the security council has been in the works for some time, CompTIA was careful to point out that the Cheet-Sheets.com suit was not connected in any way to the council: "We [CompTIA] did this on our own," Linhart said.
CertCities will bring you more on this story as it develops. -B.N.
|
There are 158 user Comments for “EXCLUSIVE: CompTIA Settles Suit Against Cheet-Sheets.com; Launches Industry "Security Council"”
|
Page 8 of 16
|
11/14/01: RICK says: |
SURE, I AGREE WITH THE COMMENTS IN REGARDS TO THE CISCO HANDS ON CERTIFICATION TO PROVE YOURSELF BUT THOSE "GREEDY BASTARDS" DON'T BRING ABOUT THE PLEASURE OF AN OPORTUNITY TO SOME WITHOUT SHEDDING SOME TEARS AS WELL BY PUTTING A HIGH COST IN PRICE TO BOOT UP AND PROVE YOURSELF TO THE HIGH LEVEL SKILL OF THEIR CERTIFICATION. LETS HOPE MICRO$OFT DOESN'T TAKE AFTER THAT ASPECT EITHER;"GREEDY BASTARDS". WHAT I DO LIKE ABOUT HANDS ON TESTING IS THAT SCHOOLS WOULD HAVE TO HAVE BETTER FACILITIES SET UP WITH EQUIPMENT AND TRAIN A LOT BETTER THAN MOST OF THEM REALLY DO. ..WHERE WAS THE LAST SCHOOL THAT YOU ATTENDED THAT YOU SAW AND DID LAB PRACTICE IN THE FULL SPECTRUM OF THE WINDOWS 2000 NETWORK IN ACTION WITH DOMAINS,TREES,FOREST,ZONES,SITES,ACTIVE DIRECTORY REPLICATION,DNS,WINS,DHCP,RADIUS SERVERS,RAS,FIREWALLS,ROUTERS,RELAY AGENTS,IIS,SUBNETS,AND T1&3 LINES;("98.8% DON'T"). HANDS ON TESTING WOULD BRING ABOUT SOME CHANGES FOR SURE...AND ALL FOR THE BETTER I WOULD SAY. |
11/15/01: Barry says: |
Guns 'n' Roses ROCK!!!! |
11/15/01: Anonymous says: |
WHAT-----WHAT!!!!!! CHEET-SHEETS IS GONE? DAMN TALIBAN, I WAS SO CLOSE TO GETTING MY MCP, DAMN THESE TALIBANS!!!!! |
11/26/01: kenny says: |
POST REMOVED -- Sorry Kenny, we don't allow solicitation of dumps on our site -- violates our posting policy. If you have any questions, please e-mail me at [email protected] -- BECKY NAGEL, WEB EDITOR, CERTCITIES.COM |
11/21/01: Dana says: |
If Comptia wouldn't charge $264 every time you take a test and make the questions so ambigious, maybe people wouldn't need to cheat. That's not whining, that's just being intuitive. |
11/21/01: Little says: |
If Keen Interactive is half-way intelligent, they will more their site, and company off-shore. |
12/5/01: Chester says: |
Hi kenny le, I'm the owner and webmaster of CertifyExpress.com I know that cheet-sheets site is totally gone, what happen to them? From what I've read here CompTIA settle suit with cheet-sheets right? or is there anybody suing them right now? |
12/6/01: Anonymous says: |
I am so sure that no body can pass the test from Microsoft because their tests are totally different with their own book. If you take all those design tests, you will know what I mean. Three hours for 4 or 5 case studies. The reading time for those case studies is about 2 hours. How could someone pass the test. You can sue www.cheet-sheets.com, why dont you look back yourself and ask yourself a question that why those test questions can be leaking out. Like www.troytec.com or www.testkiller(s).com, they are doing the samething. Why dont you take a lawsuite on them either. I am not defending for CheetSheets, alot people dont like the way CheetSheets did, but there are a huge number of people wishing that CheetSheets will open again or open in another way, another name. Paper MCSE is BS sometime, but that is better than nothing. |
12/6/01: jr says: |
I have a great deal for everyone in this site, give me 125$ or 200+ if you prefer, and you get the privilege of answering questions only I know the answers for. If you decide to ask anybody else other than my approved course provider (my cousin guido soprano) i breaka your kneecaps, by the way did i tell you that if you pass you "might" be guaranteed a 64K a year job as an "IT PRO", and also everyone knows about the great shortage in the industry so come on spend your money on ME, but of course you might still have to answer some more questions i might think about at the bowling club. So remember boys and girls: Non "authorized" CheetSheets = Bad Cheetsheets approved by my giant company = good |
12/10/01: Anonymous says: |
I currently have passed 5 exams of the MCSE 2000 track and passed the Beta exam for XP Pro. Things are not black and white, there are many issues. From my experience passing the exams, i have bought all training kits from MS, and i can tell you that those training books, DO NOT prepare you for the exam, i was really surprise when i took my first test, which was 70-210, i studied the MS training book for a month and a half, and i was amazed to see the Training Kit didn't prepare you well at all for the exam, and that is pretty unfair. You can't show up on an exam with out knowing how is it gonna be...I found questions that were never covered in the Training kit, and i was quite angry. MS should provide better learning material to prepare the exams, unitl then Braindumps will continue to be popular...and ask your self...why are they so popular? Answer: because MS does a VERY POOR job preparing you to the exam. Though the Training kits are not trash, you do learn good stuff from them, but they just don't get you ready for an exam because the topic of the questions from the exams are not covered in the Training kit ressources. |
First Page Previous Page Next Page Last Page
|
|
|
|