CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
"
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  e-Book Shop
  Practice Exams
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Cocoa Beach Hotels
Plantation FL Hotels
Surfers Paradise Hotels
Palm Springs Hotels
Tucson Hotels
Palm Springs Hotels
La Jolla Hotels
Plant City FL Hotels
Cincinnati Hotels
Kansas City Hotels

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Monday: January 10, 2005



The New TechMentor Register Early and Save!
  • 6 New Tracks
  • Exam Discounts
  • Year-End Savings
Register by
March 4th
and save $200 off
the new TechMentor!

* REGISTERED USERS ONLY

MOUS AI To Become MOUS Master Instructor


5/22/2001 -- Microsoft has decided to replace the MOUS AI program with a new certification: MOUS Master Instructor.

The new title will be a part of the existing MOUS Master program and, as such, will have the same exam requirements as the current MOUS Master:

MOUS Master 97 Instructor

  • Microsoft Word 97 Expert
  • Microsoft Excel 97 Expert
  • Microsoft Access 97 Expert
  • Microsoft PowerPoint 97 Expert

MOUS Master 2000 Instructor

  • Microsoft Word 2000 Expert
  • Microsoft Excel 2000 Expert
  • Microsoft Access 2000
  • Microsoft PowerPoint 2000
  • Microsoft Outlook 2000

Previously, AI candidates were required to pass two MOUS exams in their track, as well as meet the program's education requirements. According to Bruce Reemsnyder, senior director of Strategic Accounts for Nivo International (the organization that manages the MOUS program for Microsoft), the new title will have similar educational requirements as AI -- the increased number of exams is the major difference.

"Our Master program is the highest-level [MOUS certification] we offer. It was pointed out to us by both instructor and our partners that some of the students were certified at a higher level than the instructors [because some students were master level]," he explained. "It makes sense that our instructor should have the highest-level certification."

"Blending the concepts seemed to be the natural evolution of AI," he continued. "This new program will offer an increased ROI for participants and in turn a new challenge. We have raised the bar for instructors and the student will continue to benefit through a continuously improving classroom experience."

Reemsnyder told CertCities that current MOUS AIs can use their titles and logos until June 30 of this year -- the date by which AIs would normally need to renew their certification. At that time, the MOUS AI program will be retired, and candidates will need to apply to become MOUS Master Instructors.

Fees for the new program have yet to be worked out, although Reemsnyder said that significant discounts will be given to those previously MOUS certified.

According to Reemsnyder, complete details of the new program will be published on the MOUS Web site within the next two weeks, which would give current MOUS AIs just one month to turn around an application for the new program before their current title expires. New candidates who had attempted to apply to the MOUS AI program during the past few weeks will be on hold until the new certification is implemented.

One such candidate is Eileen Kelly, who found out about the retirement of the MOUS AI last week when she attempted to apply for the program.

At that time, Kelly was only told that the MOUS AI program was being discontinued, which caused her considerable frustration. "Over the last two months I have spent nearly 1500GBP on exam fees, travel and accommodation, study materials, and the recognized Train The Trainer Course and Video assessment," she told CertCities. "In addition to this there is the amount of study time required to pass the Expert exams. Knowing that this expense was for nothing is painful."

When told the about the new program by CertCities, Kelly said that the retirement makes more sense to her now, but that she still isn't happy with the changes. "I am obviously frustrated that the work and expense I put into the MOUS AI program did not deliver any benefits, but at least it wasn't totally wasted. I had intended to progress to Master certification anyway, but the delay will cause me considerable inconvenience," she said.

"The main reason I’m angry at whoever is responsible (be it Microsoft or Nivo) is the fact they gave us no forewarning, letting people continue to pursue this accreditation."

When asked about the short notice given candidates, Reemsnyder replied that he understands the frustration this has caused some MOUS AIs, adding "I wish we could have come out with the details sooner."

As stated above, information on the new MOUS Master Instructor title will be published on the MOUS.net Web site within the next two weeks, and Microsoft has indicated that current MOUS AIs will also receive individual notification via e-mail.

CertCities will report any further details here as they become known. - B.N.

UPDATE (5/24/01): Microsoft/Nivo have published a FAQ about the MOUS AI/MOUS Master Instructor transition on its Web site. Click here to access.



There are 85 CertCities.com user Comments for “MOUS AI To Become MOUS Master Instructor”
Page 5 of 9
5/30/01: Neal says: 2 things have irked me about this. First; I found out about the AI retirement from a source other than Nivo/Microsoft. Their failure to provide concrete information about the new program shows little respect for AI’s who have invested thousands of dollars and hours in this program. Second; CertCities reported above that "the increased number of exams is the major difference". This contradicts what was told to ‘Nancy Anonymous’ by Nivo (see Posting #8). Moving from a T-T-T requirement to a 4-year Education degree is hardly a minor difference when compared to completing a few simple MOUS exams. I am in favor of the bar being raised (I’m an AI and Office 2000 ‘Master’) but I think the bar should be placed somewhere between the existing requirement and that for MCT.
5/30/01: Becky says: Neal -- When I talked to Nivo, they didn't know what the educational requirements would be, but they told me they were going to keep them very similar; in fact, I got the impression that they were going to ease them somewhat, and not make them harder. Obviously, dropping the TTT allowance would be the opposite of that; they may have changed their minds since I talked with them. I'll try to see if I can get some official comment on this and let you know.
5/30/01: Anonymous says: Hi fred coulter that is exactly what i mean what will happen to those AI's who are not masters? they are going to have to tell their employers and clients that they are no longer authorised as instructors (hence severe embarrassment) and cannot re register as would be expected of such a programme. any reasonable certification organisation would give adequate notice for members to learn the other applications and at least run the 2 programmes side by side for a reasonable period (say six months)to allow those AI's with only 2 quals to upgrade. (PS am also a MOUS Master and i am worried about their complete lack of support in this matter what will their next step be in 2 years time when MOUS MI's have established client bases perhaps they will abandon MI's in the same way, whith the same short notice, and demand that the new MOUS Instructors have MCP qual in Visual basic, after all it is the basis of Microsoft Office - where will it stop?)
5/30/01: Anonymous says: Going to a Master Instructor certificate is a great idea, their is a perception from students that anyone who is an Authorized Instructor is certified in all areas of MOUS. Going to Master Instructor should correct this misperception. But I do feel that there should have been a reasonable amount of time to give AI's who at this time have not passed all exams a chance to do so, (I am a master in 97 and 2000, and worked hard on all of the exams to pass them to achieve master level status and being an Authorized Instructor). Anyone who is in education (K-12, college, etc), you get use to having the standards on a yearly basis with a little amount of time to complete them.
5/30/01: MOM says: I am an MCSE, MCT, CTT, CCNA, CIW Associate, I-Net+, Network+ certified individual. I was also a MOUS AI. This certification fit extremely well with the courses I delivered. I was however, NOT certified in Access 97 or 2000 as I was certified in SQL 7 ... a much larger database application. Now if I wish to remain an authorized instructor I must pass the Access exam...something isn't right here! Nivo and Microsoft should get together, if SQL or Exchange server is passed by an individual this should replace the requirement for Outlook 2000 or Access 2000... let's face it, the latter two exams are far more complex and broad! Just my two cents worth. At this point I'm not sure if the Office trainer certification is worth it!
5/30/01: Donald says: Here we go again. Another Nivo/Microsoft "MONEY GRAB". What's the matter guys, couldn't you figure out how to bleed the MOUS-AI's for more $$$ without cancelling the existing program? And what's the change in midstream regarding the MOUS logo's? I get business cards printed with the logo and now someone has a brainwave that you can't use it anymore. What's the big deal about logo usage? Are all the Microsoft logos also being rescinded? I have been a MOUS-AI for over a year and have some pride in that designation because we are few in number compared to the hoards of MCSE's. Do I have to cut the logo off the pea-green shirt as well or maybe I should just mail it back "COLLECT" ! It's funny how we get all the e-mails about changes to exams and releases of new exams but a major change like this is thrown at us one month before cancellation. That's all we need is another lapel pin. Regards from Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
5/30/01: George says: I hold a Master's Cert in Both 97 and 2000, and I have the now useless MOUS AI designation. I'm a dept head and The lead instructor at a midwest buisness college . What truly irritates me is that I made the mistake to trust Microsoft to spend more than the time it takes to boil water on maintaining anytihng to do with the Office Suites progrms. I do not epxcect them to keep the promise of significantl reduced costs, or consider a rollover program for those already "qualified" - - -and I'm absolutely certain they will not entertain any discussion of reimbursing costs for business cards, stationery, etc, that some of us use in our businesses where the MOUS AI logo was imprinted. Had they queried the people in the system first before doing another "shotgun start" -- they may have heard from people who really know what is going on out here on the street. Strange -- did anyone else alos notice that thios happened right after you got the request/offer to be an SME for designing XP tests??
5/31/01: Anonymous says: Microsoft/Nivo have used MOUSE AI's as a marketing tool (for research and promotion of MOUS & Office) and treated them as a product rather than committed (yes we must have been mad to trust them) people with enthusiasm and an interest in furthering MOUS and Microsoft.
5/31/01: Anonymous says: organisations that change standards and requirements with little notice are working to a crisis management system and are probably of poor standard anyway.
5/31/01: Steve says: I understand the need to change. To become an AI one SHOULD also be a master AND be familiar with how the products interact with one another. What I don't understand is (1) why Microsoft/Nivo is not porting everyone who IS Mous AI and Mous Master over to the new certification automatically. (2) Why has the option to use the logo been taken away from us? This is a great way to prove, on web sites, on business cards BEFORE you meet with the client/student you are qualified. Giving us the ability to wear an (overpriced) pin or (vastly overpriced) jacket will not properly enable us to sell ourselves. If product resellers can use the microsoft logo. Why can't we?
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page

Want to post a comment under this article? Please register. It's free, it's easy, and you'll only need to register once to access all of CertCities.com's exam reviews, tips articles, the ability to post under articles, and more. Click on the button below to start your registration,or read our FAQ if you'd like more information.
Already registered? Log in here:
User Name:
Password:
Remember me on this computer
" Forgot User Name/Password

top

Sponsored Links:
MeasureUp Practice Tests On Sale: Get your A+, MCDST, MCSA, or MCSE!
Free Authorized Cisco eLearning: from Global Knowledge
TechMentor is Back in Orlando with 6 New Tracks: April 4-8, 2005
Keep Current on Microsoft News: Subscribe to Redmond Report Newsletter
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!



Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Copyright 1996-2005 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications