CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
"
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  e-Book Shop
  Practice Exams
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Arlington Hotels
Shreveport Hotels
Haines City FL Hotels
Zurich Switzerland Hotels
Minnesota Hotels
Satellite Beach FL Hotels
Live Oak FL Hotels
Fredericton Hotels
New York City Hotels
Mount Crested Butte CO Hotels

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Sunday: January 9, 2005



The New TechMentor Register Early and Save!
  • 6 New Tracks
  • Exam Discounts
  • Year-End Savings
Register by
March 4th
and save $200 off
the new TechMentor!

* REGISTERED USERS ONLY

MOUS AI To Become MOUS Master Instructor


5/22/2001 -- Microsoft has decided to replace the MOUS AI program with a new certification: MOUS Master Instructor.

The new title will be a part of the existing MOUS Master program and, as such, will have the same exam requirements as the current MOUS Master:

MOUS Master 97 Instructor

  • Microsoft Word 97 Expert
  • Microsoft Excel 97 Expert
  • Microsoft Access 97 Expert
  • Microsoft PowerPoint 97 Expert

MOUS Master 2000 Instructor

  • Microsoft Word 2000 Expert
  • Microsoft Excel 2000 Expert
  • Microsoft Access 2000
  • Microsoft PowerPoint 2000
  • Microsoft Outlook 2000

Previously, AI candidates were required to pass two MOUS exams in their track, as well as meet the program's education requirements. According to Bruce Reemsnyder, senior director of Strategic Accounts for Nivo International (the organization that manages the MOUS program for Microsoft), the new title will have similar educational requirements as AI -- the increased number of exams is the major difference.

"Our Master program is the highest-level [MOUS certification] we offer. It was pointed out to us by both instructor and our partners that some of the students were certified at a higher level than the instructors [because some students were master level]," he explained. "It makes sense that our instructor should have the highest-level certification."

"Blending the concepts seemed to be the natural evolution of AI," he continued. "This new program will offer an increased ROI for participants and in turn a new challenge. We have raised the bar for instructors and the student will continue to benefit through a continuously improving classroom experience."

Reemsnyder told CertCities that current MOUS AIs can use their titles and logos until June 30 of this year -- the date by which AIs would normally need to renew their certification. At that time, the MOUS AI program will be retired, and candidates will need to apply to become MOUS Master Instructors.

Fees for the new program have yet to be worked out, although Reemsnyder said that significant discounts will be given to those previously MOUS certified.

According to Reemsnyder, complete details of the new program will be published on the MOUS Web site within the next two weeks, which would give current MOUS AIs just one month to turn around an application for the new program before their current title expires. New candidates who had attempted to apply to the MOUS AI program during the past few weeks will be on hold until the new certification is implemented.

One such candidate is Eileen Kelly, who found out about the retirement of the MOUS AI last week when she attempted to apply for the program.

At that time, Kelly was only told that the MOUS AI program was being discontinued, which caused her considerable frustration. "Over the last two months I have spent nearly 1500GBP on exam fees, travel and accommodation, study materials, and the recognized Train The Trainer Course and Video assessment," she told CertCities. "In addition to this there is the amount of study time required to pass the Expert exams. Knowing that this expense was for nothing is painful."

When told the about the new program by CertCities, Kelly said that the retirement makes more sense to her now, but that she still isn't happy with the changes. "I am obviously frustrated that the work and expense I put into the MOUS AI program did not deliver any benefits, but at least it wasn't totally wasted. I had intended to progress to Master certification anyway, but the delay will cause me considerable inconvenience," she said.

"The main reason I’m angry at whoever is responsible (be it Microsoft or Nivo) is the fact they gave us no forewarning, letting people continue to pursue this accreditation."

When asked about the short notice given candidates, Reemsnyder replied that he understands the frustration this has caused some MOUS AIs, adding "I wish we could have come out with the details sooner."

As stated above, information on the new MOUS Master Instructor title will be published on the MOUS.net Web site within the next two weeks, and Microsoft has indicated that current MOUS AIs will also receive individual notification via e-mail.

CertCities will report any further details here as they become known. - B.N.

UPDATE (5/24/01): Microsoft/Nivo have published a FAQ about the MOUS AI/MOUS Master Instructor transition on its Web site. Click here to access.



There are 85 CertCities.com user Comments for “MOUS AI To Become MOUS Master Instructor”
Page 3 of 9
5/24/01: Obed L. says: Soy de Venezuela he presentado los examenes y tengo las credenciales para ser MOUSE AI hace dos semanas inicie el procesos y todavía no he obtenido la mas minima respuesta acerca de mi solicitud (envie los recaudos, etc)ahora salen con esto, que va a suceder con los casos como el mio, nos exigen presentar un examen de Outlook 2000 y la versión del examen no ha sido liberada, deberían por lo menos informar que debemos hacer en nuestro caso
5/24/01: Robert says: Dear Niel Cheung The MOUS AI Does require proof of Instructor qual which i have (A Teaching Certificate which took me a long time and a lot of money to get) get your facts right please
5/24/01: Ross says: I recently received confirmation that I have been approved for my MOUS AI and received my certificate in the mail as of today, but as of June 30th, I will need to complete ACCESS in order to qualify for the MOUS MI. I don't understand why they didn't offer both, rather than scrap one and replace it with another. If both were offered, existing MOUS AI's wouldn't be affected, but could be given the opportunity of applying for the MOUS MI once all the necessary courses were completed. Perhaps giving AI's about a year versus 1 month to complete the necessary courses before scraping it all together would make more sense to me.
5/24/01: Eileen says: The turn-around is short. I am a MOUS AI and suggest that there be a period of time for both to exist.
5/24/01: New to says: I am glad to see the requirments raised. I did feel that in order to be an AI that you should have crediability. That means being a master. Why should someone who has only passed two expert tests be instructing others? Also a college degree will help add crediablility. I think that this is a smart move and will filter out those who have traded on the name AI with out the credentials. I look forward to seeing how the new program will work and being one of the folks who have meet the new requirements.
5/24/01: Becky says: New to Mous -- Hi, just to clarify, a college degree was one of the educational "qualifiers" for the MOUS program. The ones for the new program are still being worked out, but will probably be very similar (at least that's what Bruce said). -- Becky Nagel, Web Editor, CertCities.com
5/24/01: Catherine says: Long overdue, more of these qualifications need a higher standard to be proud of. I endorse what is being done, in order to be a Microsoft Authorised Instructor you should be a Master - these applications don't work in isolation. Let's get rid of the myth if you can't do the job, you teach it!
5/24/01: Rob says: Hello Catherine Payne Yes they can work in isolation otherwise they would not be sold seperately for example Word can perform primitive database and spreadsheet functions. Outlook does not need the other applications in order to perform it's functions and access can be a completely self contained application producing reports etc. I am MOUS Master. the whole accent is on USER ie there are people who can USE particular applications very efficiently and have a knowledge of how to apply this efficiency in business. They may have done the MOUS exams to enhance their career prospects and make very good instructors since they have a practical Understanding of how the application is USED and can interpret the clients needs rather than teaching by rote. Most of my clients don't want to build access databases they want to USE them efficiently. I have many clients who USE Word or EXCEL but do not USE the other applications so someone who (for example) specialises in teaching WORD and EXEL is a useful team member with a good client base. I do however agree that a 2 day course does not make a good trainer mine was a one year part time certification in adult education with observed teaching practice. There is room for MOUS Master instructor and MOUS AI in the same programme the mOUS Master would have an overview and the AI's would either work towards Master Certification or specialise in their area.
5/25/01: Nancy says: I value highly my MOUS AI - however I NEVER train in Access on my job. Why would I want to take the time and effort to learn ACCESS and pass the exam if I never have application to train in that package. Does that mean I am no longer considered an authorized instructor just because I do not have Access? We should at least be able to continue to wear our shirts and lapel pins for being an authorized instructor in the areas that we have shown expertise.
5/25/01: Fiona says: Training in applications is very different from other kinds of training, I dont believe you need a degree to teach someone how to use a desktop application. I took an instructional skills course - paying $800.00 no more than a month ago and now it will be useless?? That infuriates me. I am already MOUS Master and had the intention of taking a further degree in Adult Education when I return to the UK. Now it seems I cant get the initial qualification? Well, guess what Microsoft - you dont HAVE to be a Microsoft Instructor to teach Microsoft Products. If they dont play fair here I will move along to someone who does and I hope everyone else follows suit.
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page

Want to post a comment under this article? Please register. It's free, it's easy, and you'll only need to register once to access all of CertCities.com's exam reviews, tips articles, the ability to post under articles, and more. Click on the button below to start your registration,or read our FAQ if you'd like more information.
Already registered? Log in here:
User Name:
Password:
Remember me on this computer
" Forgot User Name/Password

top

Sponsored Links:
MeasureUp Practice Tests On Sale: Get your A+, MCDST, MCSA, or MCSE!
Free Authorized Cisco eLearning: from Global Knowledge
TechMentor is Back in Orlando with 6 New Tracks: April 4-8, 2005
Keep Current on Microsoft News: Subscribe to Redmond Report Newsletter
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!



Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Copyright 1996-2005 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications