CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
"
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  e-Book Shop
  Practice Exams
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Job Search
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Hotel Reservations
California Hotels
Colorado Hotels
Arizona Hotels
Florida Hotels
America Hotels
Cheap Hotels
Hotel Chains
USA Hotels
Last Minute Travel
Airline Tickets
Car Rentals

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Features ..Feature Story Tuesday: November 9, 2004



* REGISTERED USERS ONLY

Q&A with Barbara Decker, MOUS Program Manager
Meet the new program manager for the Microsoft Office User Specialist program.

by Becky Nagel

10/31/2001 --

CCDA
-- Barbara Decker, MOUS program manager.
In June 2001, Microsoft named Barbara Decker as the new manager of its Microsoft Office User Specialist (MOUS) certification program. Decker, a former trainer, served as program manager for MCSD and MCSE certification exams before her promotion. She came to her new position at a pivotal time; right after a controversial decision to eliminate the MOUS Authorized Instructor title had been made, and just months before the highly anticipated Office XP track was to be announced. We recently had the opportunity to interview Decker via e-mail. Here's what she had to say about her new role, what Microsoft and Nivo (the organization that helps Microsoft administer the MOUS program) are doing to correct some of the problems the program encountered this past year, and what she sees for the future of MOUS both for the program and its participants.

CertCities.com: Congratulations on your promotion to Product Manager for the MOUS program. What attracted you to this position?

Barbara Decker: The MOUS program provided me an opportunity to manage all aspects of a certification program -- from program strategy and exam development to program implementation.   

CC: How will your background both in certification and as an educator help you in this role?

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

BD: I think it will be extremely beneficial. Having experience from all sides of the certification process (as a trainer, exam developer, certified individual and hiring manager) allows me to take a very holistic perspective to the program and my role. 

CC: In general, what do you think makes for a successful certification program?

BD: Value and credibility. For any certification, in any industry, it must be valuable and credible not only to the individuals pursuing the certification, but for hiring managers and others that rely on the credential to make important decisions.

CC: You took over this position earlier this summer -- what's the first thing you tackled?

BD: The MOUS program is focused on our desktop products. Coming from the IT Pro and Developer programs, I spent a great amount of time building my understanding of the MOUS program and the strategy behind it.

CC: What are your short-term goals for the MOUS program (next six to twelve months)?

BD: The next few months are going to be exciting. We are very focused on the release of the Office XP exams and new testing technologies that will improve our customers' experience. We are also looking forward to passing the half million mark for certified individuals. 

CC: What about the long term?

BD: The field of knowledge management is constantly evolving. We have begun working with customers and individuals to see how our certification program needs to evolve to continue to maintain its credibility and value for both employers and employees.

CC: Can you give us an idea what the average day of a certification program manager is like?

BD: Every day is different, but I try to start each morning by drinking a large cup of coffee and reviewing the previous day's stats and reports (exams delivered, e-mail inquires, etc.). I'm also engaging with the various Office product groups, discussing ways that the MOUS program can help them meet their business goals and vice-versa. And I talk to Nivo a minimum once each day. To sum it up, you could say e-mail, meetings and more e-mail.

CC: It seems like Microsoft is getting more involved in managing the MOUS program with Nivo -- for example, the MOUS.net Web site was integrated into the regular Microsoft certification site earlier this year. Is that a valid observation? 

BD: Yes, our customers asked us for a central place to get information on relevant certifications. Integrating the MOUS.net site in to the broader certification site provides better and broader access. Initial feedback has been very positive, so you can expect more along these lines in the future.

CC: What is the current relationship like between Microsoft and Nivo (as in who's in charge of what)? How do you work with them in implementing and maintaining the program?

BD: The relationship is going well. I work closely with Nivo's two Redmond-based account reps who administer the program to Microsoft's specifications. Collaboratively, we identify opportunities and build plans to improve the program.

CC: One thing we hear a lot about from readers is problems with the testing software during MOUS exams (e.g., crashes). Granted, your program's testing software is somewhat more involved than the typical software [Editor's Note: The MOUS testing software differs from other Microsoft exams in that it allows candidates to perform tasks within the Office application on-screen], so there's going to be issues. But is there anything going on right now to further decrease crashes and other testing software issues? What kind of attention are you giving the test delivery software pending the roll-out of the XP exams?

BD: On a regular basis we review customer experience data with Nivo and develop plans to improve the program. As you can imagine, running a distributed testing lab is a big challenge -- many things can and do go wrong. Right now, we are working to upgrade the exam driver and hardware within the testing centers. We feel these improvements will address many of the reliability issues. 

CC: The MOUS program added a multiple-choice element to one of its Office 2000 exams. Can we expect to see more multiple-choice popping up? Any comments on multiple-choice questions and how they can play a role in the MOUS certification program?

BD: Our goal is to ensure the exams help candidates demonstrate their proficiency with Microsoft Office applications. We will look to incorporate different item types when they can help students show their mastery of the content.  

CC: We've has some angry posts from MOUS program participants on our site, and most of those seem to be rooted in a perceived lack of communication from Microsoft/Nivo about important program developments. For example, when the MOUS AI program was canceled, the news broke less than six weeks before the AI title was to disappear completely, and complete details of the replacement MOUS Master Instructor program weren't posted until after AI actually retired. Also, for months the MOUS Web site said that a Project 2000 expert exam was in development, yet no updates were given and its cancellation wasn't acknowledged until some users pressed for answers. I know you weren't the program's product manager when these decisions were made, but do you have any comment on them? Do you have any specific plans to improve communications, and/or to give more notice before major program changes will be made? Do you think any/some/all of the criticism is justified?

BD: Since taking on this new role, I have been heads down digging through data, talking to customers, the product groups and getting a firm handle on the program operations. I have seen similar posts and concerns. Over the next few months, I will be taking the key learning and building a business plan to strengthen the overall program. A key metric in my business plan will be customer satisfaction. I think the work we do to improve the Web sites and communication process is critical to my success.

CC: What MOUS highlights do we have to look forward to in the next year?

BD: In the very near future, the MOUS program will have certified over half a million individuals.  This is a tremendous milestone, and there will be a tremendous celebration. 

CC: Is there anything else you'd like to share with CertCities.com readers?

BD: Thanks for giving me the opportunity to talk with you. I am very excited about my new role, the MOUS program and the customers it serves.  The program is gaining incredible momentum on a world-wide basis.  My complete energies are focused on improving the program.  


Becky Nagel, editor of CertCities.com, is an award-winning journalist with almost 10 years experience covering the tech industry. She was hired to create CertCities.com in 2000, and has been editor of the site since. She can be reached at .


There are 28 CertCities.com user Comments for “Q&A with Barbara Decker, MOUS Program Manager”
Page 2 of 3
11/2/01: gbenga adepoju says: i will like tom
11/3/01: Michael says: Nancy Anonymous: The AI program was cancelled without notifying anyone who was an AI. You're "supposed" to know that and trot on over to the website and plunk down another $50 (discounted price for former AIs) to become a MI (Master Instructor). However, you have to have passed all certification exams for either Office 97 or 2000 now--a good change. You can no longer certify by just passing several of the program certs.
11/11/01: Tom says: I am not yet a Master Instructor. I am wiling to work to jump through this hoop. I found the article to be rather shallow. There is nothing but platitides. I do, however, have concerns about the program. What was wrong with the AI program? You are hired for your expertise in specific areas. You are most often not hired to be a Rennaissance man. Having a program that allow you to certify and achieve an AI type classification in specific programs makes sense in the work world. The Master Instructor classification seems terribly academic and not necessarily work oriented. Why not provide for both worlds? Having one certification does not demean the other. I'm also concerned that the MOUS logo cannot be used legally. Why not?
11/15/01: casey says: i need to know what is a mous certification? Why get a mous certification? What can u do with a mous certification? How do I get Mous Certifed? Where in Nebraska can i get certifed? How do i do i keep Mous Certifed? this is all for class discussion anything u answer will help me thanks for u coroperation Casey
11/17/01: Carmen says: I have been trying for months now after purchasing my practice tests to purchase a voucher to take the test. (Power Pt 2000 MOUS certification) i have word and excel. i had bought the test and voucher together. i can't seem to find that site again and New Horizons the school where i take the test tells me test2 but they don;t have it either. can you assist?
11/19/01: Jide says: I want to congratulate the new manager for the microsoft office user(MOUS). There is one question that has been bugging me but this is the opportunity to ask the question. There alot of people out there who are not certified but are computer whiskids more better than those who are certified but due to lack of no funds or better jobs they are unable to sit for the exams.I am one of them .So,as a reputable organisation.What is your plan for them to help them.
11/26/01: Jim says: Jida If someone is truly interested in becoming certified, they will find the time and the money to take and pass the exams. Everyone else finds the time and the money for the exams, what makes you better than anyone else.
1/27/02: John says: I agree with Jim. Stop the BA BA BA and pay for the exams like the rest of us and become certified !!
3/23/02: Inkisitive says: It is really a pity that Microsoft decomissioned the AI program without notifying anybody or asking for feedback. With all due respect for all parties benefitted, it seems to me a trick or action to promote an individual or organization related to these exams. They have to have an excuse to eliminate these certifications which have helped many high school grads or vocational grads, who for one reason or another cannot attend college. In addition,NIVO preparation tests as well as Sefl-Test Software are/were LOUSY and expensive and do not comply with the degree of difficulty of the exams themselves, which to me, are developped by DDC Publishing, not NIVO or SELF-TEST. See www.ddcpublishing.com which has EXCELLENT books (training manuals) on all subjects related with the MOUS certification and test questions are identical to those of ddc.
5/18/02: Critiqual says: If you take the time to really read the interview you will notice a very strange structure. The questions and answers do not follow a normal conversational flow. Especially the answers. No one speaks like that in real life. Those were canned answers, written not spoken, in this interview. What probably happened was that the questions were submitted via e-mail and the answers were given the same way. This article does not even resemble real conversation, much less an interview.
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page

Want to post a comment under this article? Please register. It's free, it's easy, and you'll only need to register once to access all of CertCities.com's exam reviews, tips articles, the ability to post under articles, and more. Click on the button below to start your registration,or read our FAQ if you'd like more information.
Already registered? Log in here:
User Name:
Password:
Remember me on this computer
" Forgot User Name/Password

top

Sponsored Links:
Controlling Quality in Software Packages: FREE Webinar and White Paper
Keep Current on Microsoft News: Subscribe to Redmond Report Newsletter
Voice & IP Communications Papers and Webinars: Free on TCPmag.com
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!



Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Job Search | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Copyright 1996-2004 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications