CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Listen, See, Win! Register for a Free Tech Library Webcast
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: Beta Blowout

Tour de SQL Finale, Part IV: Replication

What Were They Thinking?

High Anxiety: Microsoft Tech Support Survey

Reader Review: The 800-Pound Code Gorilla


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



Visit Redmond Media Group

-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Cheap Chile CL Hotels
Overland Park Kansas Hotels
Willis TX cheap hotels
Maui Eldorado Resort
Queenstown Hotels
Discount Tilburg, Netherlands Hotels
Aladin Hotel In Las Vegas
Humble Hotels
Hotels in Belgrade, Serbia
Irving Cheap Hotels
Discount West Palm Beach Hotels

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Exam Reviews ..Exam Review Article Friday: June 30, 2006



Security+: Get with the Basics
This exam isn't designed to have much depth, but it does cover a wide range of security topics relevant to networking professionals.

by Andy Barkl

11/6/2002 -- As you may have noticed, in the past 18 months a greater emphasis has been placed on computer and network security. As part of that, security certification has become more popular, any many new titles are popping up to capture this interest. One of these is the vendor-neutral, entry-level Security+ from the Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA).

Most CompTIA exams are written for those relatively new to the IT industry, and generally scratch only the surface of the technology covered. Security+ is no exception. It will test your knowledge on a wide-range of security related topics, but it doesn't go into any real depth. CompTIA recommends two years of networking experience for this exam. I personally recommend some hands-on security experience, if only to give you the chance to work with many of the tools and techniques covered on this exam -- some will be hard to master without understanding the practical application. Even so, armed with one of the many Security+ study guides that will soon flood the market, I believe most people with the recommended level of experience will find the exam on the easy side.

Content Overview
The final version of the Security+ exam has not yet been released (CompTIA has said only that it will go live in late 2002). I took the beta version earlier this fall. It contained 125 multiple-choice questions and lasted two hours. When released, the live exam will contain fewer questions and cost around $199 (U.S.). To earn the certification, candidates must pass this one exam. Once earned, Security+ certification is good for life.

Security+ features five main objective areas:

  • General Security Concepts (30 percent)
  • Communications Security (20 percent)
  • Infrastructure Security (20 percent)
  • Basics of Cryptology (15 percent)
  • Operational/Organizational Security (15 percent)

Most of the domains seemed equally weighted on the beta exam, but there are certainly areas that can get more obscure than others. The following should give you a general idea of what's covered by each. (A detailed list of the exam's objectives can be found here.)

General Security Topics
General security concepts are just that, general. For instance, what is the recommended minimum length a user's password should be? What network attack method includes the attacker calling a user and pretending to be from the company's support staff? Is it a virus or a Trojan horse that replicates itself from system to system using various techniques? What is a form of two-factor authentication?

Tip: If you're new to security topics, an excellent book that can get you up to speed in this area is "Computer Security Basics" from O'Reilly.

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

Communications Security
This domain can include slightly more obscure topics. It will help if you're well-versed in today's network security protocols. Do the acronyms VPN, RADIUS, TACACS+, L2TP/PPTP, SSH, and IPSEC mean something to you? You need to know these protocols (and many others) plus their uses to pass this domain. For example, make sure you know the advantages of a VPN and how to create one, which remote access protocols can be used to centrally authenticate users, and which OSI layer the various protocols operate at.

Infrastructure Security
This domain requires that you understand firewalls, routers, switches, wireless devices, modems and intrusion detection systems, to name a few. CompTIA also expects candidates to be able to field questions regarding TCP port numbers, access-control techniques, and of course, methods for securing wireless and other devices.

Other objectives within this domain include securing network media, removable media, security topologies, security baselines and application hardening. Can you answer questions like: What is the most secure network media available? What are the methods used to secure data on removable media? Is a DMZ a form of a secure network topology? How can you create security baselines? If you remove ActiveX controls, is that a method of application hardening? As you can see, this domain is a step-up from the first two, but still not too difficult.

Basics of Cryptology

Now it's time for some real fun. This domain includes objectives for security algorithms and hashing. You'll also find concepts of cryptology, standards and protocols, and key management/certificate lifecycle objectives. This is where you'll need some of that network security experience that CompTIA didn't tell you about but I think is required. Simply studying the different security algorithms such as MD5, SHA, DES, 3DES and RSA will only leave you asking, what was that? You really need to setup a lab where you can experiment with the different encryption methods and truly understand the concepts behind each. After all, what fun is it if you can't walk the walk?

The other half of this domain includes the PKI objective of certificates. Here again you'll need to be familiar with the practical side of things, including certificate issuance, revocation, expiration, suspension, renewal and destruction. If you're running a Windows 2000 server network in your lab, it's fairly simple to install and build a Certificate Server and get the hands-on experience that you'll need for this section.

Operational/Organizational Security
This is where you'll find some of the more interesting objective areas such as physical security, disaster recovery, forensics, education, and documentation. Well, O.K., not all of them are very exciting, but a few are. For example, my favorite is forensics. Investigation and gathering of evidence, to find wrongdoing to prevent further misuse can be exciting. Of course, most of the time you may be doing nothing more than securing the system to prevent accidental damage.

Physical security includes controlling access to systems and data, such as the server room. Make sure you know all the methods used to control physical access, such as card readers and biometrics.

For the disaster recovery section, you need a fairly solid understanding of the baseline techniques and procedures. You should also be familiar with data backup and restore strategies.

With business continuity, organizations will put in place public media relations experts in case a network attack occurs. Then there are natural disasters that can disrupt the business continuity. Should you install your hot site within the same geographic boundaries as your primary site?

Policies and procedures are always a tough thing to deal with and get users to adhere to. You should be familiar with the reasons for policies and procedures and the necessities of writing, maintaining and enforcing them.

User education is one of the primary responsibilities of any network security person or team, and the advantages of awareness campaigns to promote user compliance are tremendous. Most network security problems or attacks in today's networks are internal, and many of the problems can be attributed to user errors. Training and education both need to play a bigger role in many of our corporate networks.

Documentation is the final objective in this domain -- usually the last thing anyone ever completes. However, well written, complete and up-to-date documentation can make the difference between an ad-hoc network and one that is truly secure.

Preparing for Security+
Along with the recommended experience, CompTIA recommends (but does not require) that you hold its A+ and Network+ certifications. I don't agree that you should have A+ -- there's not much crossover here -- however, Network+ may be a good idea for some, especially considering Security+'s heavy coverage of TCP/IP.

As I mentioned earlier, a flood of Security+ study guides is heading our way. But if you don't want to wait for the market to shake these offerings out, you can always pick up a more general security title. Auerbach publishing offers a few titles, including the popular "Information Security Management Handbook." Sybex also has many security titles available, as do a wide variety of IT publishers. Personally, I prefer the Auerbach books. While they're not designed to be used as exam study guides, they contain the information you need and are also excellent for technical reference.

Security+ preparation classes may also become widespread. But you can also take a more general security class. I recently attended a course from SANS. This organization has many courses to choose from, including Security Essentials, which is designed for the new security person. SANS is also another resource for security-related books.

Getting Secured
I think Security+ will be used by many to gauge one's awareness and basic understanding of network security. It could even be used by employers for select user groups as part of a security awareness campaign. At the very least, the exams and/or the study guides developed for it should be required for an organization's technical and support staff.

There are other security certifications available on the market today, but most of them are geared towards the higher-level IT professional with the word security in their job title. Security+ is for the rest of us, and does what it's designed to do -- serve as a way to test baseline knowledge of this important topic.

 


Andy Barkl, CCNP, CCDP, CISSP, MCT, MCSE:Security, MCSA:Security, A+, CTT+, i-Net+, Network+, Security+, Server+, CNA, has over 19 years of experience in the IT field. He's the owner of MCT & Associates LLC, a technical training and consulting firm in Phoenix, Arizona. He spends much of his time in the classroom but has also been responsible for many Microsoft Windows 2000, Exchange 2000, and Cisco networking deployments for many clients across Arizona. He's also the online editor for MCPMag.com, TCPMag.com, CertCities.com, and a contributing author and editor for Sybex and Cisco Press. He hosts a multitude of exam preparation chats monthly on MCPmag.com, TCPmag.com and CertCities.com. You can reach him at .


More articles by Andy Barkl:


There are 49 CertCities.com user Comments for “Security+: Get with the Basics”
The current user rating is: two stars - somewhat challeging 1/2
Page 5 of 5
10/30/05: AK says:
three stars - difficult, but manageable
I passed this exam yesterday. 796. Used Exam Cram And Boson and Beach Front Quizzer. It requires a very high score to pass. I was a bit tight on time otherwise overall it was not that hard. Had to do lot of preparations. Oracle 10g AS here I come...;)
12/12/05: Jerry from London says:
two stars - somewhat challeging
I passed CISSP but failed Comptia Security for just 6% I think it is difficult to find a study guide that is going to Make you understand the way the test is build! If you don’t really needed it prefer CISSP or Checkpoint certification.
1/24/06: Dan from Massachusetts says:
three stars - difficult, but manageable
I liked the exam for the fact that it opens your eyes to alot of different angles of what you will come accoss in security. I passed first time out by a decent score. I invested a couple of weeks and the night before cramming til 12:30am studying to beat it. Worth the investment-Good luck...
1/28/06: truthteller from UK says:
one star - cakewalk
I just want to know one thing - Why are they charging 225.00 for an exam that will never pay for itself (in the form of a job.) I have taken and passed 3 COMPTIA exams on the first try - the only value they have is as an easy elective for MCSE or MCSA.
2/16/06: mark from honolulu says:
three stars - difficult, but manageable
Any well prepared for exam is easy, especially if you use the technology on a daily basis. If not, put together a small lab at home and see this stuff first hand. Setup multiple domains, AD GPOs, secure email, PKI, cert services, internal VPN, secure remote access, firewall rulesets, IDS, honeypots, DMZs, and secure wireless (wep - wpa, including radius & wireless vpn). Top it off with internet-facing hardened Linux & Windows web servers, centralized loggin, antivirus, and backup. Write out a security analysis, policies, and procedures & implement them along with a recovery plan. Then go take CISSP and Network Plus with good confidence.
4/13/06: Robert says:
three stars - difficult, but manageable
I took the exam as an elective for the MCSE Security track. I have 10 years of It experience and have passed many Microsoft certification exams from NT4 up to 2003. I found this exam to be more difficult then the average Microsoft exam and I failed it on the first try, passed with a narrow margin on the second. The exam is also quite expensive for an entry-level exam. The range of questions goes from very simple ('what is a virus?') to very difficult.
5/4/06: Greg from United Kingdom says:
four stars - very difficult
I would have to agree with Jerry. I have taken this exam twice and failed. Hoping to take it agin today. The first time I took this exam, I wanted to know what areas where covered and how difficult it really was. I then studied up alot on all areas. Felt confident, but the exam I feel was mostly on procedure, policies and documentation. These areas I did just scrape the surface when studying. I was very disappointed, because any other questions I had, I nailed it. This time I have done more research into Security Policies and Documentaiton, so hopefully I should get through. Prep test I have found crap. Transcenders I found for this exam to be way off in there questions. None really test you on the areas I failed on in the last exam I had taken. The Que book was very good to learn from, more so then the Sybex book. Again, I would only go for this exam if you realy need it. Otherwise I feel it is a waste of time and effort.
5/30/06: Greg from Kentucky says:
three stars - difficult, but manageable
I agree with a lot of the above. Don't rely on the Sybex book - it's got some good info, but not enough. Poorly worded questions can be a pain (definitely a trademark of CompTIA). I got one percentage point away from passing this test the first time. And you know what? The stupid testing engine screwed up on me as well during scoring - I was surprised that the score wasn't lost.
6/5/06: J. Walker from San Diego says:
four stars - very difficult
This test was harder than I thought it would be. I agree with a previous post that stated that Transcender isn't much help on this one. You might need several good books and a test prep package to pass. I passed, but barely.
First Page   Previous Page     Last Page

Exam Difficulty Rating Key
five stars - true gurus only true gurus only
four stars - very difficult very difficult
three stars - difficult, but manageable difficult, but manageable
two stars - somewhat challeging somewhat challeging
one star - cakewalk cakewalk
Your comment about: “Security+: Get with the Basics”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   
top


Sponsored Links
Try IT Certification Training Videos Free
Microsoft, CompTIA and Cisco multimedia-based Computer Training
Computer Based Training
Microsoft MCSE, Cisco CCNA CCNP, A+, CISSP Self-Study Computer Based Training
20% Off Transcender
Practice Exams, Study Guides, eLearning Courses
Subscribe to Redmond magazine
It’s free and available in print or PDF!
IT certification news delivered weekly
Subscribe Today!



Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Press Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | Redmond Media Group | TechMentor Conferences | Tech Library Webcasts
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute
E-Gov | EduHound | ENTmag.com | Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | Government Health IT
IT Compliance Institute | MCPmag.com | Recharger | Redmond magazine
Redmond Channel Partner | TCPmag.com | T.H.E. Journal | TechMentor Conferences
Copyright 2000-2006 1105 Media, Inc. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications is now 1105 Media, Inc.