CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Post Your Mind in the CertCities.com Forums Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Columns ..Column Story Tuesday: December 28, 2010


 Certification Advisor  
Greg Neilson
Greg Neilson


 Certification Ethics 101
Two exam preparation shortcuts that true IT professionals should avoid at all costs.
by Greg Neilson  
9/12/2001 -- It wasn't that long ago that certification exam preparation products didn't exist at all. You either took the vendor class, or you knew the material anyhow and took your chances with the exam.

Since then, certification has become a huge boon to technical book publishing -- a myriad of test preparation tools keep springing up. In most cases, we pay the money for these products to shorten the time taken to prepare for the exams and also to improve the chances of passing that exam. However, there's a couple of shortcut approaches I would advise you not to take.

The first shortcut I feel you need to make a decision NOT to use are braindump Web sites. The word "braindump" has a variety of meanings, but in this context it means someone has written down the test questions they experienced together with their suggested answers. Sometimes these can be quite organized with a number of test takers putting their thoughts together, resulting in a fairly large pool of questions for each.

To put it simply, braindumps are cheating. I guess some people rationalize this away by declaring that certification exams often ask about obscure product features; but, at the end of the day, by using these resources you are cheating yourself and also everyone else who has or wants to hold that certification. We've seen a model for this with Microsoft's NT 4.0 MCSE exams. Unfortunately there is now a common perception that braindump sites have been used all too often by participants, so it is often felt that the certification itself is not worth as much as it used to. There have been many steps taken by Microsoft to reduce the effectiveness of these sites for Windows 2000 exams, but undoubtably some devious people will eventually find ways to get around this.

Another area that concerns me is that so many test participants seem to view Transcender exam preparation software as freeware. (This happens with other products as well, but I see it most often with Transcender.) I must say that I don't use Transcender's products myself, and I don't have any stock in their company, but these are licensed products and I feel that they should be treated as such. People who wouldn't dream of using pirate operating systems or office suites seem to have no qualms about swapping pirate versions of Transcender's offerings. I've heard people say that these products are useful exam preparation tools, and I'm assuming that people justify the piracy because of the high price of the products, but that's a pretty poor reason. A few years ago I used to get many unsolicited e-mails from people wanting me to share pirate copies of Transcender (although I'd never bought any!), but now I think people are more suspect about making this piracy known. With the completed certification in hand, we have the intention of showing the world that we're capable IT professionals (stress on the word "professional") and not pirates.

Please give some thought to your ethical situation as you prepare for your exams. You may not agree with my opinions here, but it's a good idea to at least make up your own mind on where you stand on these issues. What do you think: Am I too idealistic, or are there other areas you think need to be avoided in order to ethically prepare for exams? Let me know by posting your thoughts below.


Greg Neilson, MCSE+Internet, MCNE, PCLP, is a Contributing Editor for Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine and a manager at a large IT services firm in Australia. He's the author of Lotus Domino Administration in a Nutshell (O'Reilly and Associates, ISBN 1-56592-717-6). You can reach him at Attn: Greg.

 


More articles by Greg Neilson:

-- advertisement --


There are 45 CertCities.com user Comments for “Certification Ethics 101”
Page 5 of 5
1/9/02: Flukeman says: I am one of many,who,for one reason or another wanted to join the IT field(Career changer).At the time my only experience was my home PC and a desire to learn more about it.Yes,I was sucked in by a slick salesman for a IT training company(Microsoft certified training center as well as Cisco,Novell,etc.)who promised a myriad of tech jobs by just passing one of my MCP exams.After my 2nd class for Nt 4.0 MCSE(AND PAYING THEM $8500) I realized I was in over my head.No refund policy available.Unfortunately I did have to resort to braindumps to try and complete Mcse because soon after my classes started MS wanted to retire NT 4.0.Then Win 2k came out and I figured why learn old technology when there is something newer out.So I started self-study for Win 2k and put NT 4.0 aside after passing 1 NT 4.0 exam.Then MS decides later that MCSE for NT 4.0 not gonna be retired.AARGH!!!So now I have $8500 down the drain so to speak and am stradled between NT 4.0 and Win 2k.Recently I passed 2nd requirement for Win 2k.Now what do I do give a training facility more of my money for a MCT to spew out of the MOC books or try to use Braindumps,transcenders,etc. and complete my MCSE for win 2k.I did get a job doing help desk support and pc builds but after downturn in economy lost my job.What advice would you folks have for someone like me?Maybe instead of arguing that braindumps are cheating and creating "paper MCSE'S" alert the general public about these "training centers" and how they operate.Also the amount of money spent on books that have the material in them that MOC leaves out can be pretty darn expensive.Stay away from training centers unless you already have the specific O.S. knowledge because I feel that as a newbie I could have received the same knowledge from sitting at home and reading the material myself.I hope that others will read this and not get burned by these "training centers".Until the current certification process changes braindumps will probably still continue to exist.
1/9/02: Anonymous says: May I wonder aloud? I have not pursued the exams. I was building systems and setting up the initial design for networks since B4IBM. DEC/PDP-11... Used many different OS, starting with CPMl... I took the A+ without any prep, and found out I would not hire me if all I had was a certification. (I scored above 90's) There were no Diagnostic or reasoning Challenges. I have looked at a number of Brain Dumps for Net+ and MCSE, and see the same lack of reasoning. And nothing that would indicate raw guts of spending three hours to find that both terminators on a coax were ungrounded... I am UNCERTIFIED and wonder if certification from a diploma mill would help.
11/30/02: Anonymous says: I recently passed the vb desktop MCP exam with a high score.i studied for 4 months and used the dumps to brush up before the exams.Over the period i was studying i would search websites for brain dumps as practice tests and found ones submitted as early as in 1999. What i found was that there was little difference between the dumps of 99 and the ones that were submitted recently.Now isin't Microsoft a little concerned about people using dumps to pass their tests,then why do they not simply change the exam questions?the exam at the testing centers has to be downloaded first.They are not per-loaded on the testing computer.If the exam needs to be downloaded from Microsoft's website then why do they not just change the questions?Why have they stuck with the same set of 80-85 questions for the exam that were released 3 years ago?there should be atleast a 1000 .Could it be possible that Microsoft simply wants to make money by making more people take exams with the help of dumps?
7/9/05: robert hunter from australia says: One (albeit) expensive way to stop certification cheating is for exam vendors to offer "live, hands-on" exams like those offered by Red Hat and Cisco. It is impossible to cheat in these exams as they require both knowledge and hands on experience-either gained in the workplace, or by practicing on a home network and or a classroom. I have yest to meet a Red Hat or Cisco CCIE graduate who doesn't know their stuff. Some paper MCSE's on the other hand, are total idiots! Besides some "Microsoft" "solutions" to networking problems are totally self-serving, and any MCSE that applies them to their employers network is asking for trouble. For example, who in their right mind would use M$ Internet Information Server instead of Apache? Or use a Microsoft firewall in preference to a Cisco or Linux firewall? Also, Microsoft exams are basically dishonest. In one exam for Windows XP workstation, only about 45% of my questions related to XP workstaion, the rest were server-based questions, or those asking about other MS technologies. In my MSCE course I studied seven subjects, but the questions were drawn from dozens of other exams subjects which I had not studied. In contrast, my Red Hat and CISCO exams only tested me on the subject matter I had studied. They were tough, but very fair exams. In other words, many students are in a catch 22 situation. In order to gain real world experience, they need to show a potential employer an MCSE, so they can work to gain experience to pass their MCSE! So I can understand why some people find the need to cheat. Braindumps just teach students bad habits. It's probably best for any employer that interviews a paper-certified candidate to sit them in front of an off-line server, and see if the person can actually administer it.
12/13/05: nunya says: Does Greg Neilson think reading a textbook is cheating too?
First Page   Previous Page     Last Page
Your comment about: “Certification Ethics 101”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top