CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Visit CertCities.com Forums and Ost Your Mind Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Columns ..Column Story Tuesday: December 28, 2010


 Certification Advisor  
Greg Neilson
Greg Neilson


 Certification Ethics 101
Two exam preparation shortcuts that true IT professionals should avoid at all costs.
by Greg Neilson  
9/12/2001 -- It wasn't that long ago that certification exam preparation products didn't exist at all. You either took the vendor class, or you knew the material anyhow and took your chances with the exam.

Since then, certification has become a huge boon to technical book publishing -- a myriad of test preparation tools keep springing up. In most cases, we pay the money for these products to shorten the time taken to prepare for the exams and also to improve the chances of passing that exam. However, there's a couple of shortcut approaches I would advise you not to take.

The first shortcut I feel you need to make a decision NOT to use are braindump Web sites. The word "braindump" has a variety of meanings, but in this context it means someone has written down the test questions they experienced together with their suggested answers. Sometimes these can be quite organized with a number of test takers putting their thoughts together, resulting in a fairly large pool of questions for each.

To put it simply, braindumps are cheating. I guess some people rationalize this away by declaring that certification exams often ask about obscure product features; but, at the end of the day, by using these resources you are cheating yourself and also everyone else who has or wants to hold that certification. We've seen a model for this with Microsoft's NT 4.0 MCSE exams. Unfortunately there is now a common perception that braindump sites have been used all too often by participants, so it is often felt that the certification itself is not worth as much as it used to. There have been many steps taken by Microsoft to reduce the effectiveness of these sites for Windows 2000 exams, but undoubtably some devious people will eventually find ways to get around this.

Another area that concerns me is that so many test participants seem to view Transcender exam preparation software as freeware. (This happens with other products as well, but I see it most often with Transcender.) I must say that I don't use Transcender's products myself, and I don't have any stock in their company, but these are licensed products and I feel that they should be treated as such. People who wouldn't dream of using pirate operating systems or office suites seem to have no qualms about swapping pirate versions of Transcender's offerings. I've heard people say that these products are useful exam preparation tools, and I'm assuming that people justify the piracy because of the high price of the products, but that's a pretty poor reason. A few years ago I used to get many unsolicited e-mails from people wanting me to share pirate copies of Transcender (although I'd never bought any!), but now I think people are more suspect about making this piracy known. With the completed certification in hand, we have the intention of showing the world that we're capable IT professionals (stress on the word "professional") and not pirates.

Please give some thought to your ethical situation as you prepare for your exams. You may not agree with my opinions here, but it's a good idea to at least make up your own mind on where you stand on these issues. What do you think: Am I too idealistic, or are there other areas you think need to be avoided in order to ethically prepare for exams? Let me know by posting your thoughts below.


Greg Neilson, MCSE+Internet, MCNE, PCLP, is a Contributing Editor for Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine and a manager at a large IT services firm in Australia. He's the author of Lotus Domino Administration in a Nutshell (O'Reilly and Associates, ISBN 1-56592-717-6). You can reach him at Attn: Greg.

 


More articles by Greg Neilson:

-- advertisement --


There are 45 CertCities.com user Comments for “Certification Ethics 101”
Page 2 of 5
9/19/01: Doug says: Sick of people saying the exams only test "obscure features." If you work as a consultant at many different job sites (which MCSE is designed for), you will run into all of these obscurities and more. Quit complaining. Using brain dumps is definitely cheating and goes against the Microsoft test rules. Nevertheless, it's up to the employer to weed out paper MCSE's with no potential and brain dump cheats. Drill them on technical issues during the interview.
9/19/01: Anonymous says: I'm personally not certified on Windows NT 4.0 or anything else. I don't believe in MCSE since I've seen MCSE coworkers and they don't seem to be able to apply the suppossed "knowledge" they gained from taking the tests. Were they cheating?, don't know but I believe on hand on experience. Not to offend anyone who took the test ligitimately and got all the knowledge. I rather read the books and apply the knowledge and use hands on, nothing beats that.
9/19/01: Ms. says: Speaking from the point of view of a student with a few years of I/T experience, I can't completely condemn the use of test preparation materials or braindumps. I have taken a class prior to every certification test that I've taken. I have also used the braindump sites, but never felt ready for the test until I knew why the answer was what it was. It is a fact that classes teach according to a book, and a good teacher who knows the test will interject things he/she knows will be on the test, but are not in the book. No class I have ever taken has adequately prepared me for a test. My study afterward, using example tests, exam crams, and my home lab, is what really got me ready. Think about Windows 2000, a brand-new operating system which not many companies have implemented yet. Not everyone has the means to purchase computers and software for a home lab. Where are such people supposed to get "real-world experience?" A background in NT 4 does not prepare you to be able to answer questions about Active Directory. The extra preparation materials are needed. People who just memorize questions and answers ARE cheating, and are not worth the paper their certificate is printed on. However, using such materials to cover the (huge) gaps that the class missed is another matter entirely. Especially when learning something brand new to the market that it would be impossible to have real world experience to back up. Good interviewers can weed out the good and bad candidates, as was mentioned above. Bet me, a person who cheated on an exam and then lost a prime job opportunity because he/she really didn't know what he/she was doing, and it came out in the interview, would definitely learn a lesson from that.
9/19/01: Ms. says: I forgot to add a comment: It is a good feeling to go to a braindump site for some help, and find that some of the answers are inaccurate, and know that you know what the real answer is. People should be careful when using those sites, because they aren't 100% correct in the answers they give. I guess that's a good reason to stay away from them. People who take a test and give the wrong answers based on a brain dump site are really proving their lack of knowledge.
9/19/01: Carey says: As a Testing Center Administrator I found this article very interesting, and right on the nose. The difference between someone that has used braindumps and Transcender and someone that has worked hard to learn the technology is obvious. I've noticed this situation mostly with Microsoft exams. I can control the testing environment and make it a level playing field for everyone that takes a test at my Testing Center, but I cannot take measures to ensure that they haven't memorized every possible Q&A. I will continue to expect everyone that I test to conduct themselves as professionals and prepare for exams by learning. You might pass a test on a braindump at my Testing Center, but I'll make sure that you understand my position before you leave with that score report!
9/19/01: Fatboy says: There have been a lot of good comments on this particular issue. As an IT student with no real world experience I can honestly say that I have passed the four core MCSE win2k exams(so far) with MOC, testing software (not memorized) and a home lab. I do codemn the use of braindumps. The use of braindumps significantly lowers the value of the certification that I am working so hard to obtain. I agree with Ice Beer in that lab exams should be conducted to show that you actually know what you say you know.
9/21/01: my2cents says: I think braindumps can be good, IF used correctly. I have used them as a roadmap, to see what specific topics are being covered on the exam. Then taking that information and studying it myself, testing it in a home lab or at work. I simply wouldn't be willing to see someone's posted answer to the question and accept that. Sure you may end up passing the exam and become an MCSE, but what happens when you face the problem in real life. With current IT cutbacks, companies don't just hire someone because they are an MCSE. In fact I understand many IT departments are cutting staff, only to hire experienced people who can actually "walk the walk".
9/21/01: Osei says: I have to comment about the brain dump issue. I have worked in the industry as a consultant for several years and found it extremely difficult to land decent positions without certification near impossible. Were it not for the braindumps I would not have ever been able to get anywhere. The preperation books often cover a vast amount of information without focussing on anything real world. Courses are often prohibitively expensive, and usually refer you to braindumps (edited by the instructor for accuracy)in order to give you an idea of how the test process goes and the question formats, and content. The usefulness of braindumps is not in the memorization, but in the familiarization with test content. The MOC doesn't cover a lot of what's on the test, so how are you going to find out what is? Preparation materials are only good if they actually prepare you for a test, by giving you the knowledge that will be tested, not just basics.
9/22/01: Reality says: Give me a break!..you know that questions of cert exams are dark and they ask you any unpractical feature they can...and as is well known "in the war and love everything is permitted", so, cheat is acceptable. You'd better open your church or something.
9/22/01: Don't Ask says: Hey, it's like John Q. Public says.It's a catch-22 and people like me resent the system since I'd much rather start as an 'apprentice' of sorts, learn the system better, then take the exams. But MS does things its own way and need I remind everyone that a lot of what they do put in the books doesn't come up in everyday usage? I've seen my share of systems engineers gripe about getting clunked by an exam despite them having 4-6 years' experience in the field. In any case the true value in so-called Braindumps is NOT in memorizing them but in figuring out what the true answers are and WHY. MS loves tossing garbage at people in their exams, it's only fair for people to sift through (and help each other)in order to learn something we'd otherwise have a hard time finding out for ourselves.
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “Certification Ethics 101”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top