 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Kevin Kohut
|
|
|
 |
 |
One Small Step for Certification… |
Getting rid of braindump sites may be good for the industry, but in Kevin's opinion, much more needs to happen before most IT certifications can actually mean something again. |
by Kevin Kohut |
2/26/2003 -- So, Robert Keppel is going to jail for his criminal actions in operating a braindump site. Now that CheetSheets.com is no longer, other braindump sites are jumping for cover (at least the ones based in the U.S.). What will all the wannabe IT pros do now? How will they get their certifications? Who will guide them through the technical labyrinth of Microsoft's tricky exam questions and confusing scenarios?
I'm thrilled to see the braindump sites starting to disappear. While I don't necessarily support the criminal prosecution of such braindumpers (seems more like a civil issue), I must admit that I'm liking the results. There's a chance now that, someday, my hard-earned MCSE will mean something again. I can just see it -- potential clients actually impressed with my certifications. Maybe we're on the long road back to the good ole' days of IT consulting!
But to get there, more has to happen. Much, much more. First off, all you existing "paper" MCSEs would need to relinquish your certs, knowing that your sacrificial efforts will help restore prestige and value to your "real-world" compatriots. Go get an entry-level job, put in your time doing the grunt work, and then let's talk about your IT skills. Or at least show me that you've done something outside the lab in your garage.
But it can go even further. I'd like to see the "legitimate" purveyors of certification exam helps recall their offerings and agree to publish only traditional how-to and reference material. What we need on the bookshelves are step-by-step guides and easy-to-look-up references, example-laden configuration manuals and "let me tell you how I did this in the real world' books. Enough of the "cram with this book and pass the test" stuff.
And all you employers of IT professionals out there, you also need to join the fray. How many times have you hired someone for an IT position based on his myriad certifications? Replace all those richly certified but actual experience-lacking individuals with true IT professionals.
Next, I want to talk to the training providers, the bootcamps, the "we'll make you an MCSE, MCDBA, and MCSD in 8 weeks" folks. You guys need to start by truly screening potential students. Oh, I know you all claim to enforce prerequisite skills, but most of you accept anyone who qualifies for financial aid. You also need to change your curricula: Don't teach to the test, but rather provide real-world skills to address real-world situations. It'd be great if you couldn't collect tuition for a student until that student actually got hired and stayed on the job for at least 90 days.
And let's not forget the companies that started this whole thing: The software and hardware vendors that implemented certification programs in the first place. Microsoft, take a cue from Cisco and develop a lab-based exam that is virtually impossible to pass unless you truly know your stuff. In fact, why doesn't Microsoft (and other companies with certification programs) simply get out of the certification business altogether? Vendor-neutral certifications haven't completely established themselves as worthy alternatives to their vendor-specific cousins, but they are finding their way into acceptance as a valid measure of IT prowess. If these could evolve into higher-level programs that truly take a neutral yet comprehensive approach to vendor technology, then we'd be getting somewhere.
Yeah, I'm glad to see these braindump sites go. But even if they all disappear, it's only one small step towards reclaiming the glory, the prestige, the practical value of my MCSE. Maybe I'll actually hang my MCSE certificate back on the wall again! 
|
Kevin Kohut has been involved with information technology in some form or another for over 18 years, and has a strong business management background as well. As a computer consultant Kevin has helped both small businesses and large corporations realize the benefits of applying technology to their business needs.
|
|
|
 |
More articles by Kevin Kohut:
|
There are 63 user Comments for “One Small Step for Certification…”
|
Page 6 of 7
|
4/21/03: TomHead says: |
Kevin your story sounds like people must justify their credentials to you. You're a writer whose only IT experience comes from MCPTechMentor conferences where you wonder around acting like a smug jackass looking for any free goodies you can get your hands on yet you write from up there on your high horse. I'm pretty sure you're barely getting by on your writing jobs (judging from the way you dress and groom yourself) so I'm wondering how quick you would be to judge if you lost your job too. Where would you work if not judging people in your writing, because I can sure as hell tell you it wouldn't be my company. I imagine you would break down in tears if someone dropped you in front of a broken network and told you your life depended on fixing it. |
4/21/03: Kevin Kohut says: |
Thought I'd give some additional comments on all this: I make my living by providing real IT services to real companies. I fix broken networks all the time, typically after several failed attempts by others. I am a working, well-paid IT professional. Call me whatever names you like, but I'm doing what many of you are aspiring to do. Maybe I do know a little about what I'm talking about! |
4/22/03: Anonymous says: |
You are arrogant, narcissistic, and quick to congratulate yourself. Maybe if you were more humble, and not such as a$$ people wouldn't be so quick to beat you over the head. Why don't you write more than one article every six months, it's becoming harder to mock this one because its been ripped to shreds by everyone else already. You should act more like Greg Neilson, he seems professional and well-spoken, and more importantly not a jerkoff like yourself. |
4/23/03: Becky from Editor, CertCities.com says: |
FAKE POST REMOVED |
4/23/03: Warren says: |
Dude, it is like burning the flag you can do it but watch out for the sucker punch. Mr.Kohut, I know that your article was supposed to be about revamping the IT standards, but look at your readers. Most are finding it hard to get jobs, with experience and certifications, often told by family and friends that the IT market sucks and they need to find new work. Mr. Kohut please pick up a Want-Ad and look at the experience wanted for most jobs (3 years ago in the DC area some wanted a MCSE 2000 with 4 years of experience it is 2003 now). There is a reason people will cheat and claw their way to the top is to be gainfully employed. I know you see it; people feel you just don't care about it. Hey I might be wrong, Respectfully Warren , BA, CCNA,A+, MSCE 2000, MCDBA 2000, LINUX+, SECURITY+, HP, Brainbench Cisco Network Support. |
4/27/03: driven says: |
This is bs! I have just recently been discharged from the military and during my last year I went to a vocational school which awarded me a Multi platform certificate diploma. I have Aplus cert and one MCP. I worked my butt for the certs, I study all the time. The certifications are still valuable you just have to make them appear valuable to your employer! Also the comment about the IT industry being dead is also crap. Like any industry their are periods when you have slumps and then when it picks back up. I say if you are driven and you think this career field is for you then go for the certs but don't stop there, get your experience and your degree but constantly keep learning, because your passion for the career field will keep you employed not the paper certs!!! |
4/28/03: Anonymous says: |
please oh please change this article, oh powers that be at certcities! |
4/28/03: Anonymous says: |
2 MONTHS and counting for this literary piece of cr@p!!! |
5/2/03: Dale from Tulsa says: |
I have been saying this for many years. I just hope one day Microsoft will listen. The best way to do away with brain dump sites is for Microsoft to teach what they test and test what they teach. Novell does! You can study a Novell white book (are they still white?) and pass the test. Microsoft has established a set of knowledge and skills that they want you to have to support their products. They should clearly identify that set of knowledge and make training available, even at some level of profit for them. Microsoft tests what they call "real world" which is only their own perception of the real world. Their certification is "their" product. They own it. They can require any level of knowledge that they like. I have no problem with that, just don't make it such a guessing game to know how to prepare. And for those of you who will say "prepare by working in the business", I guarantee that not one of you is doing everything necessary to pass those tests on the job. Now, that said, there actually is a place to get 90% of what you need without buying books, practice tests, or cheat sheets. That place is Technet and the Resource Kits. For my tests I read the Resource Kit for the product I was going to test from cover to cover, and studied key areas of Technet for many hours. The volume of information is absolutely overwhelming but it is the closest thing you will get to knowing everything Microsoft wants you to know until they get behind the "teach what you test and test what you teach" philosophy. |
5/16/03: Richard Gadsden from Manchester, England says: |
Braindumps vs. "Mock" examinations: It has always seemed remarkably strange to me that the certifiers themselves (ie Microsoft et al) don't make "mock" examinations available. For academic examinations - both pre-university like A level and university - it's routine to be able to look at last year's questions so you can practice in the examination environment. Braindumps that cover the exact questions that are still on the test are clearly a problem, but why on Earth don't Microsoft produce an example test or two for new exams and also sell the expired questions from older exams. After all, they need to change the questions every so often so people can't just sit the exams a lot of times until they've seen all the questions. What is the refresh time on Microsoft exams anyway - six months? Once the question has come off the exam pool, Microsoft can then publish it and people can then use them as practice questions. |
First Page Previous Page Next Page Last Page
|
|
|
|