 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Greg Neilson
|
|
|
 |
 |
Just What Are You Waiting For? |
Greg shares with you the advice he gave to his IT staff: Own your career now, or face losing it later. |
by Greg Neilson |
10/9/2002 -- The following is based on an e-mail I sent to my staff this week. While many of them are doing a great job at keeping themselves current with the latest technologies, there are too many for whom I feel I am more interested in their career than they are. Many CertCities.com readers will similarly already be actively managing their skills growth, but this column may be of benefit for those still employed in IT who don't now feel the same need to keep themselves up to date. This discusses Windows NT skills, but many of the same arguments could be made about COBOL programmers, for example.
Today is the first week of October. That means we now have only 12 weeks left this year. Many of you have talked about wanting to improve yourselves technically and complete a certification, yet from my view less than a handful of you seem serious enough about this to actually achieve anything in 2002.
I admit that I am an extreme case and am always driven to continually learn more, but I still find myself alarmed at how complacent and comfortable many of you seem to be in your career in IT. It's as if you would be happy just toiling away with NT 4.0 for the rest of your working life, even if that was another 20, 30 or 40 years away. But NT 4.0 is now six years old, and one could make a good argument that this version was merely another of the incremental upgrades to NT since the original release in 1993. That makes this technology essentially nine years old! Many of you were not even working in IT back in 1993.
Even the NT follow-on product, Win2K, is almost three years old, yet the majority of you don't have extensive skills with it. In an era where companies have been cutting education dollars we have done very well to get everyone attending Win2K education, yet I acknowledge that these classes alone can never be enough. You will always need to supplement classroom education with self-study in your own time. Completing a certification program then after attending classes is not only useful to readily demonstrate your skills, but also to retain and build on the learning from those courses.
I've alluded to forthcoming technology changes, and I'm sure that you all know that Windows .NET Server is destined for release early in 2003. But if we look at the bigger stage, there's so much more. The R&D now underway by some of the main software vendors will lead to systems that will require much less staff to actually build and manage them. Those staff still required will be those highly skilled people who configure and monitor the health of these essentially self-managing systems.
From a business viewpoint, companies in around the world are very interested in the outsourcing opportunities offered from countries such as India. In the past, this has been primarily in the area of application development, but with the rapidly growing communications capabilities available worldwide, this has increasingly led to this being used for systems management outsourcing as well. As I see it, there is no way that we can compete on price alone, so one option available is to concentrate on the more higher-level value-added services. When building and managing servers becomes a commodity, then we are going to need specialized skills and capabilities to stay ahead of the game. Otherwise, we will likely be forced into a change of career outside IT. (I'm not here to debate the merits of globalization, but I simply want to acknowledge it and outline how we might adjust to it).
Let's also look at the positive side of the future. I think most industry commentators are of the view that IT activity will start to pick up from the current levels within six to 12 months. This will mean that we will need people to take a lead role in important and exciting projects that implement these newer hot technologies. These exciting opportunities will likely present themselves to those who are most qualified for them -- to the high performers with demonstrated higher levels of skill.
In this day and age, we will never have lifetime employment, but we can work hard to ensure that we have lifetime employability. I can assist you here in your career development, but you owe it to yourself to OWN your career. Many of the changes I have talked about here are not going happen overnight -- or perhaps not even next year -- but who can say where things will be in five years time or longer? All of the above is just my personal view, and is intended only to get you actively thinking about your future. Just what are you waiting for? 
Questions? Comments? Post your thoughts below!
|
Greg Neilson, MCSE+Internet, MCNE, PCLP, is a Contributing Editor for Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine and a manager at a large IT services firm in Australia. He's the author of Lotus Domino Administration in a Nutshell (O'Reilly and Associates, ISBN 1-56592-717-6). You can reach him at Attn: Greg.
|
|
|
 |
More articles by Greg Neilson:
|
There are 50 user Comments for “Just What Are You Waiting For?”
|
Page 4 of 5
|
10/24/02: Warren says: |
eyeccd, do not give up it might take a while ,but the tech market will pick up, and the folk who stayed in the tech game will make money again. Money will be threr hang in there do not off yourself! We need good techs. |
10/24/02: Steve says: |
As a Senior Networking Instructor who holds various certifications and has extensive industry experience, I must say that I find the way in which you (politely) berate your employees for not having greater Windows 2000 experience odd. The primary reason that many people do not have the extensive exposure to Windows 2000 that they do to Windows NT 4.0 is largely because Windows 2000 has failed to capture the market as thoroughly as it's predecessor. In those areas where is has made significant inroads, corporations find that many of it's claims to lower TCO are offset by the reality that many of it's new features are occasionally administrative nightmares in disguise. Further, the value of Microsoft certifications has seen a staggering decline. Microsoft contributed to this when they failed to make any noticable distinction between NT 4.0 and Win2K MCSEs. When coupled with the increased cost one faces in obtaining MCSE certification, many individuals fail to see how doing so could possibly advance their careers. Why should they put extensive effort and expense toward a certification shared by almost 500,000 other individuals and regarded by many employers as "dime-a-dozen?" I recommend to my students that, unless they want to obtain the MCSE for personal reasons, they focus a small portion of their time and effort on obtaining the MCP via the Server exam and spend the rest of their time pursuing other certifications. As for those employees who seem less than eager to earn their Win2K MCSE or gain extensive hands-on experience with it, I would suspect that they are indeed "OWN"ing their careers and, as such, focusing their efforts on other areas more likely to produce results. Steve, CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I, CNA |
10/24/02: Jim says: |
Eyeccd, I hate to tell you this but your certs are worth nothing these days. A CCNA is considered as a "take a 2 day class and pass" cert. It's proof of nothing. As Steve pointed out, the value of MS certs has drastically declined. Why is this? It's because MS certs do not and never have been a valid measure of technical knowledge. They're word games, nothing more. What's worse is that they're word games with widely known answers. MS did next to nothing to defend the integrity of their tests. Certification holders pleaded with the company to shutdown the braindumps to no avail. Given their constant harping on how expensive UNIX talent is I suspect this was intentional. They wanted a large pool of low-paid MCSEs to make their software look cheaper to use. At any rate, the end result was to destroy what had been a premium cert. After having been burned by too many incompetent MCSEs employers no longer regard it has proof of any ability other than memorizing braindumps. I suggest that you pursue a Red Hat cert. I have one and it got me my present job. We're not running Linux here --yet -- but it was regarded as solid proof of my abilities. Just be aware that the tests are expensive and far harder than any MS test you've taken. If you're not prepared to go this route then I suggest you take your girlfriend's advice to cut your losses and bail out. |
10/24/02: DaRkNeSs says: |
Eyecdd, hang in there, I think a CCNA and MCP are good certs. I do agree with Jim when he says the MCSE has little value but I do not think you should try and get the RHCE unless you have a good amount of redhat linux knowledge and experience. If you want a Linux cert get Linux+ or LPI. Only cut your losses and bail out if you truly do not want to work in IT. It takes patience to get in. |
10/26/02: Thrust says: |
I've been following the comments of each an every individual on this discussion board and thought to contribute towards it. To start with I'm working at an ISP support(Helpdesk) for over 2 1/2 yrs now and I don't forsee any promotion in the near future where I can get more hands on experiance on the MCSE WIN2K certification I gained but I admit that I got this job because of MCSE NT 4.0 with zero experience or as they say when I was a paper MCSE. The point I want to derive from all my experience and certifications is that the NT 4.0 gave me a job and WIN2K is helping me survive during this recession time in the IT industry. Although I haven't gained any experience on WIN2K except for the installations I did in the labs during the training period 2 yrs back. Recently I've also passed out Exchange 2000 server. The bottom line I'm not at all worried about whether what position I'm working in or whether I'm getting the experiance in the real practical world. The only thing I'm happy is about I'm current with latest technology and will continue to pursue for certifications like CISCO's CCNA, CCDP which has captured my immediate imagination over the next year, and just wait for the right time when the economy booms back so that I'll be the latest in the field, so at the moment I'm watiing for that ray of light at the end of the tunnel while I continue to learn by staying in the darkness of the tunnel. I don't have any envy towards any vendor & I hope that I could learn everything from every whereatleast in the field of Networks which is my primary interest. |
10/29/02: Anonymous says: |
I recently worked in the IT field for 2 years. I'll admit it was on the low-tech end, but, I got my A+ before "stepping" into this field and have to admit: I didn't need it for what I did. Now don't get me wrong, you need the certs to get in, but once your in and the economy goes in the toilet (wake up everybody!) and one looses his job because of "cut-backs", where is the incentive to continue getting new certs (that all the related sites say increase salaries) when the economy isn't showing the recovery the "specialists" are boasting. That's my rant! |
11/4/02: GMG says: |
Well, Before the economy took a dive, I had no problems finding jobs in the tech sector. Since then.... I had hands on knowledge but was passed up for jobs because I didn't have any certifications. Now I have my MCSA, A+, i-Net+, Network+, and CIW. I am also working on my CCNA, CNE, and the rest of CompTIA's Certs. I was recently hired by a very large company because of my certs. Do they hold merit, yes. Do they replace experience ? No. It's too bad that you can have all the experience in the world, but when someone who works in a Human Resources Dept (who is non IT) needs to find someone with a certain cert, you need to have it. I am just surprised they don't have me get certified to use the fax machine or the phone ;) |
11/4/02: Reality in the Real World says: |
To Everyone, Certification COUNTS & it seems like a lot of you have everything BACKWARD. Information Techology is complex, difficult, ever changing, as we who inhabit this planet are. Do ANY of you pick a Doctor, Dentist, Auto Mechanic, Contractor based solely on PRICE? You do want expertise,knowledge, skill, & that this person is keeping themselves up to date on new and better ways of doing things. Do we let teenagers drive automobiles without first teaching them how to drive? Certification is higher learning in a specialized field, computer science, which is a vast & varied field. You may be responsible for a network of 30,000 users or the person who keeps safe the data that is needed for the true cure for cancer. Is anything ever truly great achieved by weak, complaining, looking for the easiest way out, people? NO NO NO. First you learn, then you apply yourself & your knowledge, then you are compensated financially & finally after years of experience you want to give back, to be a part of a better future, one in which you contributed but might not ever fully experience all your efforts. Look at the wonderful world we live in: Modern Medicine, Virtual Reality, the Human Genome fully Sequenced, Space Shuttle flights, modern food production, Modern Emergency Technology, GPS, everything we make for each other that is better, more comfortable, easier to use. When all you do is put money first, you haven chosen a very fickle master. Finally keep this in mind: In Information Technology, while you daily update your abilities, every 4 to 6 years you will have to seriously challenge yourself to acquire & learn new & completely differents skills. To music Lovers: LP's, 8 tracks, Cassettes, CD's, DAT, DVD, MP3 ? Better & better, right? It took a lot of people to work very intelligently to go from LP's to MP3's. Keep studying, keep learning, have a burning desire to make something much better, especially for your family & your kids, something that really matters,something that truly does make the world a better place to live in. When you can do that, then you truly GET IT. |
11/5/02: GMG says: |
Well said... |
11/5/02: nyert says: |
Mr. Neilson, sorry to appear to ignore your challenges to me but I've been so freakin' busy that today is my first trip back to your forum. Please understand that I based my original response solely on your article "Just What Are You Waiting For?" and was unaware of your overall track record in certification advice. You must admit that this article strongly suggests that if you don't jump onto the latest Microsoft software certification bandwagon you will soon be useless and your job out-sourced. Would I hire just an experienced person over an experienced person with certifications? It would depend upon how the interviews went -- can the certified back up his claims? (Although HR might limit my choices to people with certifications because they used buzzword matching criteria.) Sorry about the "HB-1P" bogus reference (should be H-1B") but my typing gets poor when I get over-excited. I'm glad that you disagree with me about the value of certifications and I'm also glad you have more guts than me (by expressing your views under your real name). But my main point was that people need to look beyond vendor certifications when they try to position themselves as valuable company resources and when they try to enhance their career. Being a strict techie will not get you up the ladder. You need to learn your company's whole business and how you can fit into the business plan. Most management does not understand your technical world and considers it submissive to their financial world. For most companies IT is a cost center, not a profit center, so IT workers are treated as easily replaced commodities. IT workers know that is not true, but it is up to us to change management perception. We can only do that by learning to speak their language. So, since your article was geared at people already working in IT and already with experience, I say to those people "put less effort into vendor certifications that are losing value anyway and instead focus on learning business practices in general and your own company in particular". Management will boost your career (or at least keep you around) when they can easily match what you do to their revenue performance. |
First Page Previous Page Next Page Last Page
|
|
|
|