Breaking News: Taiwan-Based Braindumpers Arrested
2/6/2004 -- The China Post is reporting today that four Taiwanese citizens have been arrested for selling IT certification exams questions through the Internet and for taking exams for other individuals.
According to the story, the four in custody -- Tung Pei-chang, 41; Hsu Ching-ping, 27; Hsiung Chih-yuan, 34; and "a man surnamed" Chang, 34 -- were arrested yesterday in various locations throughout Taiwan. Charges are fraud and copyright law.
The China Post article said that the groups sold the questions through the Web sites Test4U.net, TaipeiITtest.net and OPASScertification.net since 2001. According to the report, the sites boasted that the questions they sold were taken directly from Pearson Vue and Prometric test centers in various countries worldwide. The sites are currently offline.
It also states that in May the group began charging candidates TND $10,000 (around U.S. $300) to take exams in their place, employing a network of proxy test-takers and providing the service for about 300 clients in Taiwan.
Both enterprises resulted in revenues of around TND $5,000,000 (approximately U.S. $150,000), prosecutors say.
The China Post says that authorities were notified about the sites in Sept. of last year, but did not say whom the complaint came from.
This is the first known arrest of an overseas provider of IT certification exam questions (a.k.a. braindumps). There have been two high-profile U.S. criminal investigations, including one arrest: Robert Keppel, who owned Cheet-Sheets.com, pled guilty to a felony charge of theft of trade secrets in early 2003 and was sentenced to a year in prison. In another high-profile case, Garry Neale, then-owner of TroyTec.com and Testkiller.com, had his assets seized in June 2002 as part of a criminal investigation based on a complaint filed by Microsoft. Neale has not been charged.
These two incidents virtually quashed the U.S. braindump market, but overseas providers flourished, taking advantage of disparities between U.S. copyright laws and those in other countries, as well as the difficulties in prosecuting non-U.S. providers. This case is the first visible sign that some progress has been made on the international front.
At the Association of Test Publisher's conference earlier this week, this reporter talked to several IT certification security experts who hinted that things may be changing shortly for international braindump providers, but none referred to specific cases. Jack Killorin, Prometric's vice president of Worldwide Security, did remark in an interview that the industry has been looking at using criminal charges other than theft of trade secrets -- such as fraud, conspiracy and falsifying documents -- to pursue such cases, a tactic that has been successfully applied in at least one criminal case involving a higher-education entrance exam. "Do I care if they're charged with violating trade secrets or fraud...? No," he said. "I only care that they're behind bars."
CertCities.com is working on finding out more about this case and will bring it to you shortly. The China Post article can be found here. -Becky Nagel
|
There are 65 user Comments for “Breaking News: Taiwan-Based Braindumpers Arrested”
|
Page 2 of 7
|
2/6/04: Ranjan Bhandar from Bangalore,INDIA says: |
Cool News!!!,I am very sure that this kind of crackdowns will help to incresae the value of certifications.Only the real techies will survive . Now definetly it will becomea huge challenge to become a MCP ,MCSA,MCSE or CCNA.Golden Days are ahead for the IT Indstry as the real harworkres will srvive,and every one will start using their own Brain!!!Bravo!!!!!. |
2/6/04: Ima Pistoff from YukYuk, Alaska says: |
Paper Tests=Paper Certifications! I am all for PERFORMANCE based tests for ALL certs. This would eliminate 75% of all "PAPER" MCSE's and greatly raise the credibility, value and (hopefully)the salaries of those that do pass! Just my .02 cents... Ima Pistoff |
2/6/04: Anonymous says: |
Erm.... mo' money? hehe |
2/7/04: Anonymous says: |
I've had the same experience as Tammy's. I visited a few certification course providers and surprisingly, when talking to the one representative, he tried to convince me of how hard the test would be and how the course material I will get from them will help me big time, and he did it by showing me sample questions, with a TestKing link at the bottom of the page. The course fee? $2000 per exam. My friend also experienced the same thing from different institution. What's the difference now? They will keep doing it and earn $2000 per course, only by handing out those questions, isn't that fraud? But their flag is still up there, undisturbed. Besides, no matter how many vendors are caught, test questions are always available through many ways, underground or foreign websites and ftp sites, p2p sharing, chatting software (IRC and the like), etc. How can you crack all of those, which are mostly foreign based? And to me, even with years of experience and extensive knowledge, I will not gamble with my $125 for a test only to fail it by one question, when I can guarantee my $125's worth by using TestKing's doc which can be downloaded for free everywhere. That's one exam, how about 10? Would you risk $1250? Maybe you will but I won't. I still use TestKing to guarantee my passing the exams however ready I am and I know many other senior network guys do that regardless their knowledge and skills for the exams, and the company will never find out like the "paper MCSE". The value of the certs are going down and it will be, no matter if I'm being honest and waste my money on failing an exam by one stupid question, it'll not do much to raise the certs value. Maybe if the price for an exam isn't that nuts, TestKing and the like wouldn't have existed and I wouldn't want to use it either. But now, please don't dream of no one use TestKing materials, I've witnessed that it's not only being used by "paper MCSE" guys (who should be filtered out anyway) but also by "hardcore" network engineers who are smart enough not to possibly waste their money to retake exams and smart enough to keep taking exams to get more titles for a raise. So TestKing isn't only for "paper certs" and using TestKing doesn't always indicate someone who knows nothing. Open your eyes a little bigger for other "smarter" possibilities, the old trends of "paper MCSE" are long gone as they get filtered easily but testKing is still useful even for the smart ones to save money. |
2/7/04: rainmaker from Timbaktu says: |
This is all just propaganda, the fact is there will always be someone trying to beat the system, weather is by passing an IT exam the easy way, or by stealing from companies like the guys at Enron, Bernie Ebbers at MCI-Worldcomm and many others. Having said that I don't believe that reading a braindump is criminal at all, hell I am good technologist, took the courses and read the braindumps, that doesn't make me a bad person, I just took advantage of a tool to get an edge. Wake up people, if governments would have their way there would be no free Internet, no cable TV and certainly no Super Bowl half time, the upcoming Grammy's are going to be tape delayed, care about that not about a few souls that are making a buck by selling the same questions that the vendors sell in their "official study guides". Thanks for reading this rant. |
2/7/04: ITPro from Texas says: |
I guess it just all comes down to a question of personal integrity. You either have it or you don't, and it shows in more than simply a certification. |
2/7/04: Just me from Canada says: |
The difference between braindumps and test-king -type sites is that the braindumps make actual, legitimate study material. Because you're an idiot if you think that you're just going to get real answers, never mind real questions. It's good study material, because you have to know your stuff to be able to pick out all the wrong answers you get in those things. It's a good option for those of us who can't afford to buy test prep questions, after paying for computers, and books to study with, and then exam fees. These guys that are putting out real exam questions are ruining it for us all. These braindumps are just that -- no one can remember a whole exam word for word. And if they can, these test centers are not doing their job and letting people take notes out of the exam, which they shouldn't. Well, that's my 2 cents. |
2/7/04: Anonymous says: |
Integrity, alright, here we go. Many IT professionals think that even using Exam Prep, Exam Cram or All In One type of books, with just a few hundred pages to cover the whole exam(s) materials worth years of experience, is considered cheating. Let alone the Transcender type of software that provide you with "similar" questions for exam preparation which actually are taken from the real exam questions with slight changes (so that they're not braindump like TestKing, etc) which are, to them, no difference than directly using dumps (check CramSession forum to see how people testified how similar the Transcender's or even Boson's test prep to the actual exam questions they sat for). They only count real experience and general topic books (non "cram" or "all-in-one") that aren't directly written only to actually reveal what will be on the test so one can just read it over and over before the exam to memorize the stuff and pass. That way, even people not using braindumps can still be "paper MCSE" only by using such cramming books, only harder. Yes I've tried it (memorizing stuff in cramming books and using Transcender, Boson, etc) and it worked and it's legitimate, eh? But what's the difference than using dumps? With such method, without me having enough background on the subject, I'd still be "paper MCSE" anyway, only without actual dumps thus legal. It's like whether you're stealing $10 or $100, but it's still stealing. Well, that's what I call integrity, you do it all the way, or not at all. And you may not recall that those IT Pro actually don't see these certification stuff as valuable as before, yet they have to take the exams and get certified to keep their job or get a raise or promotion per company's policy, regardless of the experience they've had in their pocket. Wouldn't they take a shortcut to get it done fast and they wouldn't be a "paper MCSE" anyway?! Well, for the sake of integrity, they may just go ahead and sit for the exam based on their experience but from my observation, many of them would just go ahead and get a book and a TestKing to make sure things work fine and fast. So, integrity anyone? |
2/7/04: Anonymous says: |
Give them a break. They were just trying to make mo' money. |
2/7/04: Anonymous says: |
How about selling Windows Server 2003 for $5, and also any other software you can think of, just name it, $5 each or $10 for combo package (try Win2k3, WinXP Pro, ExchangeSrv2k3, SQLSrv in one CD for $10, I've seen it work fine). Is that even illegal? Maybe no more, cracking braindumpers is more important now. That's good, it saves more money on those pricy software and makes self study for MS certs even easier, practical, and efficient. |
First Page Previous Page Next Page Last Page
|
|
|
|