CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Free CertCities.com Newsletter via E-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: Content Cops

Managing in Isolation

Keep an Eye on Those Servers

6 Steps to a Simpler Network

Your Turn: The Good and the Bad of MBSA


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Las Vegas Vacation Deal
Greece Hotels
Leidschendam Hotels
Quattro Tour Travel System Blueberry Latch
discount accommodations in Canada
Matehuala Hotels
Columbus Travel Insurance
Aladdin Resort And Casino In Las Vegas
Ala Moana Hotel
Greenville Hotels

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Monday: May 9, 2005

-- advertisement --
Free white papers, case studies, research and more for the IT Manager:

Blade Systems Move into the Mainstream

Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance

StorageWorks for E-mail Retention

Policy-based Data Management

IT Service Management


EXCLUSIVE: CompTIA Settles Suit Against Cheet-Sheets.com; Launches Industry "Security Council"


10/3/2001 -- The Computer Technology Industry Association (CompTIA) confirmed to CertCities.com last week that it has settled a copyright and trademark lawsuit against Keen Interactive, owners of the site Cheet-Sheets.com.

According to court documents, the suit was originally filed by CompTIA in both the Cook County State Court and the U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois (where it was eventually litigated) on May 21. It stemmed from allegations that Cheet-Sheets.com -- known for its advertising motto of "actual questions from actual tests" -- violated CompTIA's copyrights by selling questions that appear on CompTIA's A+ and other exams.

"We feel obliged to protect the integrity of our program," said Lutz Ziob, vice president of certification for CompTIA. "We also believe that as an industry association...we have a role to play."

Ziob told CertCities.com that Keen Interactive agreed to the following settlement terms:

  • Destruction by Keen of all CompTIA-related materials in its possession.
  • Disclosure of all customers who purchased CompTIA-related materials.
  • Payment of undisclosed financial damages.
  • A permanent injunction prohibiting Keen from using CompTIA's trademarks on its site.

Keen Interactive confirmed the settlement terms to CertCities.com, but the company otherwise declined to comment for this story, citing legal concerns. CompTIA materials have not been available on the Cheet-Sheets.com Web site for several months.

The settlement and injunction were filed with the court on Sept. 17. Days later, CompTIA sent a mass e-mail to Keen's customers asking them to either destroy the Cheet-Sheets in their possession or send them to CompTIA (reports vary as to the e-mail's content).

CompTIA said it sent the e-mail for two reasons. "We wanted to notify them [the recipients] that the information they received violates a whole slew of copyright and other laws, both at the state and federal level," Ziob explained. "We also wanted to stop them from disseminating the information further and opening themselves up [to] possible liability."

When asked if CompTIA was planning on taking any disciplinary actions against those who received the Cheet-Sheets, Ziob replied, "Absolutely not...There's no kind of judgment here." Ziob also said that so far the response to the e-mail has been mostly positive: "Many [people] thanked us for letting them know."

While this suit has been settled, future litigation may not be far off. Several certification programs whose tests are also covered by Cheet-Sheets.com materials confirmed to CertCities.com that they have been keeping an eye on this suit, including Microsoft and Prosoft Training.com. (Novell declined to comment.)

None would confirm whether they are considering legal action, but Microsoft's Director of Certification Skills and Assessment Anne Marie McSweeney issued the following statement to CertCities.com: "Microsoft is aware of the issues surrounding Cheet-Sheets.com. The value of certification resides in a given credential clearly representing a skill set and demonstrating that an individual has experience working with the technologies. Those companies and individuals who attempt to circumvent the normal process of earning a certification do a grave disservice to the industry and to themselves. Microsoft is committed to maintaining the integrity of the MCP program credentials and supports exam security across the high-tech industry."

As part of the commitment, Microsoft -- along with Novell, Prosoft, Vue, Prometric and other industry vendors -- has joined a "security council" started by CompTIA to address the issue of "braindump" sites as well as other industry concerns. CompTIA is scheduled to announce the new council officially next week. According to Fran Linhart, director of certification for CompTIA, the council is a joint effort with the Association of Test Publishers. Rob Pedigo, former director of Sun Microsystems' certification program, has been hired to run the program, Linhart said.

While the security council has been in the works for some time, CompTIA was careful to point out that the Cheet-Sheets.com suit was not connected in any way to the council: "We [CompTIA] did this on our own," Linhart said.

CertCities will bring you more on this story as it develops. -B.N.



There are 159 CertCities.com user Comments for “EXCLUSIVE: CompTIA Settles Suit Against Cheet-Sheets.com; Launches Industry "Security Council"”
Page 5 of 16
10/17/01: pony says: these comments further show the victim attitude and weak sense of ethics of so many IT Professionals. the vendor certifications are losing their credibility and purpose because so many people have dumped the Qs and As---going against their personal agreement not to disclose the exam contents. I'm in a position to support CompTia and Microsoft efforts to pursue the individuals that "fail" to take the non-disclosure agreement seriously...
10/17/01: real says: would like to see vendors develop exams that are skilled-based instead of knowledge based. then you slackers couldn't cheat. real pros don't need braindumps.
10/18/01: common says: Bust ALL of these cheating web sites!!! I WORKED for my certifications !!! It insults my hard work & knowledge by having these paper MCSEs around.
10/18/01: Anonymous says: If a test is seriously compromised by publishing "actual questions from actual tests", it says alot about how well the tests and objectives are constructed. I've never seen a certification program which doesn't qualify for, what we used to call in vo-tech curriculum departments, an illusion of training and competency.
10/18/01: David E. says: I agree with the thought that the vendor on many occassions test on situations that most of us in the field never see. I believe the postings show that those type questions are questions from MCT or wantabe guru's to show what they think at the moment they submit the question is something one must know to have the mimimum qualification to be a certified engineer.. ------ Remember these test are to viewed as the minimum of what you know.. One of my NUKE buddies and I have had to take qualifications that you must pass with 100% or you are considered to need more training ---but then that is because the whole nation and world needs you to have no room to err. With that pontification --- REMEMBER if the industry wants you to have a miminum it is encumbent on them to weed out these questions that do not show the minimum. Until they do that it is necessary for the group as a whole to post the stupid questions so everyone has a fair chance at answering those questions that should be showing the minimum quals. ALSO to those that have the need to post their scores -- remember after you get the GREEN anything above the minimum --- according to the tests mean you are overtrained. D'Baer
10/18/01: Stevieb72 says: I have passed the a+cert. I have taken a class, have a few books, and still believe I would not have passed if I only had one source of study information. In light of that to obtain more information would make the cost to high for anyone to study effectively. I support the dumps.
10/18/01: Daniel says: As one with about a dozen certs, and currently working on my fourth Windows 2000 test(70-221 to be sure), I have some experience with all of this. My observations: 1) Dumps are inherently wrong. Hey, I don't like the way I'm taxed, but if I cheat to pay less, there is hell to pay once I get caught. Parallel: my work evaluations start going in the toilet if I have my MCSE but am clueless as to what encryption technology can be used with which remote access method. 2) Having said that, I have seen some dumps and they are just wrong... ie. the "answers" are incorrect (based on my knowledge of MOC and experience with the product) to the point where I'm not sure the poster's get the 880 or 980 scores they claim to. 3) Some "legitimate" testing outfits have questions that almost mimic Microsoft's tests in content, but modify the form. Many are eerily similar (I say this post 70-216 exam). Change a company name here, or fudge the number of users there, ask for two instead of three answers, anid it IS a different question, but not substantially so. I guess I'm saying some of these almost go beyond teaching to the test. Finally my advice is to work with products. I became a CNA in 5 weeks because I installed it and worked with it. There are things that I (and others) can't do in working with the product, but that is where study guides and schmoozing come in. Spout all you want against MS, Cisco, Novell, etc. but this kind of arrangement is repeated in almost every industry... standardization. It is, as a previous poster mentioned that these reflect MINIMAL qualifications. I had my A+, and later Net+, for 6 months, using that knowlege and working with that hardware every day before I actually felt competent claiming I knew something. It is an ongoing learning process. If you don't enjoy it, it is best to find another line of work.
10/18/01: TestPrep Man says: As marketing manager for a reputable test preparation company, I am happy to hear that the certifying bodies are going after the Brain dumps and cheet sheets. We spend a lot of money and time researching, writing and developing legitimate products, and we stress that these products are to be used by people who have taken the courses, done the study, worked with the systems or have the experience. We are, in essence, the last check in the system before the test. Cheating does no one any good...the company that hires a "paper MCSE, A+, CCNA etc is cheated because they have someone who can't do the job hired for, the person cheats themselves by not doing what is necessary to gaint the knowledge necessary to be proficient at their job, and the customer gets burned by paying for an idiot! Now if Microsoft would just open up their Preferred Testing partner program....
10/20/01: Anonymous says: LOOK PEOPLE THESE CHEAT SHEETS AND TROYTEC IS FOR PEOPLE WHO ALREADY WORK IN THE INDUSTRY WHO WHO WITH THE TECHNOLGOY, I DO NOT FEEL BAD IF I ALREADY WORK WITH THE STUFF AND GET CERTIFED BY ANY MEANS NESSARY. IF YOU WANT TO GET OFF YOUR HIGH HORSES FOR A MINUTE AND THINK WHY THESE THING ARE HAPPENING PEOPLE ARE IN COMPETETION AND THEY WANT TO WIN THE BIG JOBS. HOW MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE A TON OF EXPERIENCE AND NO CERT OR DEGREES DON'T GET THE GOOD JOBS. I CCNA, BA , MCP,OCP AND A HOST OF OTHER CERTS AND EXERIENCE AND I HAVE NOT CLEARED OVER 35,000 A YEAR. SO KISS MY B)TT, TELLING ME I SHOULD STUDY WHEN I GOT MORE EXPERIENCE THAN PEOPLE PAYING OVER 8,000 FOR A TRAINING CLASS SO THEY CAN SWITCH COMPUTER FIELD FOR WORKING AT MICKY D OR BURGER KING! I AM SICK OF YOU PEOPLE LEAVE IT ALONE IF THEY DO NOT KNOW THE STUFF THEY WILL BE FIRED, BUT THE IT INDUSTRY IS SO VAST YOU WILL HAVE TO LEARN WHAT EVER THE JOB REQUIRES OF YOU ANYWAY. H*LL AT LEAST THEY CAN READ AND IF THEY GET STUCK THE B#STARDS CAN OPEN A BOOK AND FIGURE OUT THERE MISTAKES. PS. THE CAP LOCKS ARE ON BECAUSE I AM SHOUTING!!!!
10/21/01: Max says: I attend a Tech School now and have my A+ Certification and MCP, I was contemplating if I should spend $600 more to be 2000 MCSE and the postings I've seen here made my decision...I am not gonna spend the additional money...I have my A+ and MCP and is satisfied, I don't want be a PAPER MCSE...Employers will know who the Paper MCP's and the Ones who are not are...$100 dollars is allot of money for 1 test, I feel I can pass all the other tests but why would I need to?
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “EXCLUSIVE: CompTIA Settles Suit Against Cheet-Sheets.com; Launches Industry "Security Council"”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

top

Sponsored Links:
Free Authorized Cisco eLearning: from Global Knowledge
LAN/WAN Consultant Placement Camp: Guaranteed to get you eng/consulting gigs!
$10,000 MCSE/CISCO Scholarship: offered to top techs throughout the US!
FREE PRACTICE EXAMS: Test Gurus
Storage Guide: Control growth and maximize storage resources
Exchange migration survival guide and poster: It's new and it's FREE!
Subscribe to Redmond magazine: It’s free and available in print or PDF!
Fresh Cisco White Papers: Get them now on TCPmag.com
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!




Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Coming July 2005 Redmond Channel Partner magazine.
Copyright 1996-2005 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications