CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Listen, See, Win! Register for a Free Tech Library Webcast Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Monday: December 27, 2010


Cisco King of the IPS Heap


9/22/2009 -- It's official: Cisco Systems Inc. is tops in the intrusion prevention systems (IPS) segment, besting rivals Juniper Networks, IBM ISS, McAfee, Sourcefire and Symantec's TippingPoint.

All isn't sweetness and light for Cisco and other IPS players, however. According to many users, IPS systems are prohibitively difficult to maintain and update. That's caused a sizeable minority of shops to think twice before investing anew in intrusion prevention technologies, according to a new survey from market watcher Infonetics Research.

For the most part, however, shops believe in IPS. Most adopters deploy intrusion prevention-oriented technologies to safeguard their datacenters and -- perhaps just as important -- to limit or contain the impact of security issues.

"The top two drivers enterprises cite for deploying intrusion prevention systems are protecting datacenters and limiting the impact of security problems," said Jeff Wilson, a principal analyst for network security with Infonetics, in a statement.

Wilson foresees boom times ahead for the IPS segment. "The re-architecture of datacenters is top of mind for many large organizations, and security will be one of the very first considerations in a major datacenter overhaul, so it makes sense that this is a critical driver for large businesses to invest in IPS," he argues.

According to Wilson, almost 60 percent of survey respondents have already deployed (in-band) IPS devices. For the most part, Infonetics notes, respondents aren't overly concerned about managing false positives -- a known issue with in-band IPS technologies; just 15 percent cited concerns about false positives as a rationale for deploying IPS technologies out of band.

Intriguingly, one-third of respondents identified the challenges associated with keeping intrusion prevention technologies up to date as a "strong" reason not to invest in new IPS offerings. Perhaps because of this, nearly half (43 percent) of adopters are mulling IPS-as-a-service solutions. Of these, one-quarter said they'd probably opt to purchase IPS-as-a-service from a specialty (i.e., security) provider; slightly less (one-fifth) expressed a preference for a "major carrier."

Infonetics asked respondents to rank eight prominent IPS vendors with respect to technology, roadmap, security, management, value, pricing, stability and service. Cisco came out on top, followed by McAfee and then Juniper. --Stephen Swoyer



There are 9 CertCities.com user Comments for “Cisco King of the IPS Heap”
Page 1 of 1
9/23/09: Gabriel from Brazil says: It's a bit curious to me that cisco is the king of all ips. Their product suck, and rumor has it that cisco uses snort sensors to protect its own network. Some datacenters use cisco ips because it's cheap, as cisco will just give the ips away for large router deals. It sounds like a paid article, with zero credibility. Btw, tipping point, as far as I know, is a 3COM co.
9/23/09: Anonymous says: tipping point is 3com.
9/23/09: Glen from California says: Cisco IPS stinks. After years of trying to make it work reliabily (bad signatures, bad performance, bad reliability), we replace all of them (in-line) with TippingPoint. One of the best decisions we ever made.
9/23/09: John Nolan from D.C. says: Did Stephen have a deadline and 15 minutes to put this together or what?
9/23/09: Snort from Maryland says: Wow... the has to be the worst article I have ever seen. You should pull this trash from the web if you want to be taken seriously.
9/24/09: Klauss from Chicago says: What drivel. I've used Cisco security products in the past and regretted it. Management of Cisco IPS is abysmal, they don't perform well at today's network speeds and they have an undistinguished security research team with spotty updates
9/24/09: Tim Write from San Francisco says: We run CISCO IPS and it works great. We never touch the thing. It's built into most of our Cisco equipment and allows us to check the box that we have IPS in place. IPS is really just a check box for most anyway.
10/7/09: Anonymous says: This article use some part of full report. Customer give high rank to CISCO base on name. Please find full article and rewrite post
10/7/09: Anonymous says: I would disregard any comments made here, and make up your own mind based on FACTS, rather than subjective opinions. Look at the speed of sig updates after the latest Microsoft Tuesday, whats the sig coverage of vulnerabilities, whats post-sales suport like now etc etc.
Your comment about: “Cisco King of the IPS Heap”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top