CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Keep on Top of the Latest Certification News: Subscribe to CertCities.com Newsletter Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Monday: December 19, 2011


Microsoft Sues Testing Materials Vendor


8/17/2006 -- Microsoft has filed a federal lawsuit against testing materials vendor TestKing, alleging that the company is illegally selling the actual answers to its certification exams.

The suit, filed last week in Federal District Court in Seattle, claims that the "defendants have provided and are providing, without license or permission from Microsoft, the original copyrighted exam content from Microsoft Certification Exams."

Microsoft has always taken its certification programs seriously because it helps assure continued sales and proper support of its products. Apparently, according to the suit, TestKing is helping candidates cheat -- at Microsoft's expense.

"We guarantee that by using our Microsoft Exams training materials you will be prepared for your upcoming Microsoft Exam, and will pass on your first attempt," say claims on TestKing's site.

TestKing also operates other sites through which the company sells the infringing testing materials, according to the complaint. In fact, Web searches found several other, apparently related sites also selling similar test preparation materials.

The lawsuit claims multiple counts of copyright infringement and asks for a permanent injunction to stop TestKing from continuing to sell or distribute the materials. It also seeks damages. Additionally, Microsoft's attorneys asked the court to turn the Internet domain TestKing.com over to them.

TestKing's Web site lists a mailing address for a company named Certification Trendz Limited in the United Kingdom but no phone number, and the site does not identify the company's executives or management. Due to the inability to initially identify who runs the company, Microsoft issued what is called a "John Doe" lawsuit, with the defendants to be identified later.

On its site, TestKing claims to sell test training materials for a wide variety of different technology companies' certifications in addition to Microsoft's. Materials are also offered for products from Adobe, Apple, Checkpoint, Cisco, Citrix, Dell, IBM, HP, Symantec, Sun and Oracle. TestKing also offers preparation materials for some non-vendor certifications such as Certified Information Systems Security Professional and CompTIA A+.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, which first reported the suit, has posted Microsoft's filing here [PDF].  -Stuart Johnston



There are 125 CertCities.com user Comments for “Microsoft Sues Testing Materials Vendor”
Page 1 of 13
8/17/06: Peter H says: About time, they are lowering the quality of MS certifications by making it just a case of remembering answers. At least Transcender make you think about it knowing they are not actual test questions.
8/17/06: Mike says: It's about time. A colleague of mine used these guys to study for his exams and reported that most of the questions matched the actual test exactly. Microsoft should still implement performance based testing a la Red Hat RHCT/RHCE/RHCA and Cisco's CCIE.
8/18/06: Justice says: If you banned testking, according to all points of view, no one want to take professional certifications. Testking is really encouragement now since his time. If TK is banned, everyone will be depressed and there will be no one to take those exam. So. the best thing of my suggestion is TK should not be banned because there are numerous number of MCSE or CIsco or other certification holders whose mind and willingness have been encouraged by TK very greatly. Not all the certification holders can do all dedicated tasks they need some training more or less. Whatever they have many certificates, recuiters can check if his expertise meets their organization's requirement. In like manner. even almost all university graduates with good grades can't be said they can do what ever they are assigned . THe most important thing is the precious experience that save half of employer's money. not certification. but certification is a plus or glory. but the would should keep in mind that certification is not equal to experience. I am sure Microsoft, CIsco, and other are not idiots. So if they wanna be still successful , they should not ban testking. be optimistic!!! TK is doing their business like you. Be fair. I am not tesking member. I am MCSE. but I pity for new MCP and potential unforseen professionals.
8/18/06: Valerie F says: I hope Microsoft is successful and Oracle and the rest of the IT companies should jump on board and help MS hunt down the Test King owners. We don't need 'Paper Certs' holders to diminish those who have studied long and hard.....down with all the cheaters!!!!!!
8/18/06: Anti-Crack says: Why would ANYONE want to stop people from learning. Testking doesn't take the exam for them... Why are right answers now 'Wrong'? And don't give me that 1950s old-school Cognitive Bloom garbage. What's really going on here is pure reputation. Before Certification can make any money... they need to be viable.. to those with money to dish out. Don't get involved in this crud by taking is seriously.
8/18/06: Anonymous says: Phew, now MS is on TK's a$$, they're in BIG trouble!
8/19/06: Anonymous says: Testking survives because MS does not provide good training either in the instructor led courses or self-pace training path; I have done both. The training does not provide enough knowledge to pass the tests. Even real world experience may not be enough, the majority of the hard questions are based on networks that are middle to large scale enterprises that most entry level engineers well not have access to; virtual systems that can be use to learn concepts will not give you enough knowledge to scale up to large networks. Finally, MS ask questions that are outside of the defined exam parameters of tests all of the time, like Vb scripting or subneting. As long as there is a mismatch between available training paths and actual exam testing, new sites like TK will rise in Russia or other countries to fill the void.
8/19/06: Anonymous says: All the whiners and cheats emerge on this forum! Microsoft should ban you all from your certifications - you are lowering the quality of MY certifications. Boo hoo they ask questions that arent in the training materials, etc. Maybe if you read the first line of the test guides at microsoft.com you'd notice that it says experience is required? I hope Microsoft shuts TK down for good.
8/19/06: Anonymous says: Oh...well if the test guide says "experience required", that is totally different. Nice comment genius. Most of the certs today are paper certs unless experience is required and documented.
8/19/06: JuJu Bee says: Experience should always be number 1 priority. When I started Networking I had no Cisco or MS certs and I designed Small business Networks because people recommended me for what I knew not whether I was certified with X Company . Certs are a good capper if you have the experiene. I have CCNA & MCSA 2000. My experience (15+ years) is way better than my what certs dictate. And thats all my clients care about...Getting the job done because you know what you are doing.
First Page   Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “Microsoft Sues Testing Materials Vendor”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top