CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Free CertCities.com Newsletter via E-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Industry Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on Redmondmag.com!
" Cover Story: SA Exposed
" 6 Reasons To Consider Apache
" Exchange Storage Rules
" 7 Terminal Services Tips
" Your Turn: MOM 2005 Feels the Love

CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



-- advertisement --
Traveling to a
Tradeshow or Event?
Colorado Springs Hotels
Newcastle Under Lyme Hotels
Bromley Hotels
Spartanburg Hotels
Florence Hotels
Memphis Hotels
Lake Mary FL Hotels
Phillip Hotels
Essen Hotels
Quebec City Hotels

 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Features ..Feature Story Monday: March 28, 2005

The New TechMentor Register Early and Save!
Download
Conference
Brochure

Click here to download the TechMentor Orlando 2005 brochure!
April 4 - 8
Orlando, FL

-- advertisement --
Free white papers, case studies, research and more for the IT Manager:

Blade Systems Move into the Mainstream

Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance

StorageWorks for E-mail Retention

Policy-based Data Management

IT Service Management


About Those U.S. Government Security Clearances...
U.S. security clearances are one of the most sought after qualifications for security jobs today, but they're also extremely hard to come by. Here's the basic facts about how the process works, as well as scams to watch out for.

by Dian Schaffhauser

3/10/2004 -- You've found a job whose description fits you perfectly except for one small matter: It requires a U.S. security clearance, and you don't have one. As with many things in life, getting this particular position would be a long shot for you, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't try anyway.

The fact is that security clearance is something you can't obtain for yourself. Your current or prospective employer has to set the wheels in motion to get it for you. Since the process is costly and time-consuming, organizations won't do it unless it's absolutely essential. Let's review the basics.

You typically need a security clearance when you hold a sensitive position within the federal government or when you work for a government contractor or some other organization that has access to classified information or deal with other restricted information relating to national security. Clearances come in many different flavors, primarily confidential, secret, top secret and sensitive compartmented information (SCI).

Up until the beginning of October 2003, the Department of Defense ran its own security clearance operation. Now that's been handed over to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).

Once a person has been offered a position that requires a clearance, the employer opens up a request with the OPM through a federal security officer. The OPM gives the candidate undergoing the clearance check access to an online system called e-Qip, or Electronic Questionnaire for Investigations Processing, a digital version of Standard Form 86.

SF 86 is a 13-page document that asks you to list your vitals-name, social security number, place of birth, etc., and then drills down on your personal history going back at least seven years. (To see a PDF edition of the form, go here). You're expected to list where you've lived for the last seven years, where you went to school, your employment activities -- including titles, supervisor names and supervisor addresses -- people who know you well aside from spouses and relatives, relatives and associates (along with their dates of birth, country of birth and current address), your military history and foreign activities (including travel for business and pleasure), police records, medical records, financial records and delinquencies, use of illegal drugs and alcohol, and groups you associate with that espouse the violent overthrow of the government.

Sound comprehensive? The idea is to weed out those who aren't, according to SF 86, "reliable, trustworthy, of good conduct and character, and loyal to the United States." The same form also warns that your current employer will be contacted and questioned, whether you want them to be or not.

Your form and your fingerprints then go to the Federal Investigations Processing Center, which calls on investigators, both federal employees and contract, to start confirming what you've said on the form. During this phase of the process, investigators review available records (including your presence on the Internet), check with the police, run a credit check on your and talk to people who know you -- those you've listed on the form as well as people in a position to observe you, such as neighbors. Plus, you'll be interviewed yourself.

All the data that's collected ends up in a single file, called "The Report of Investigation," which is sent to the federal agency that asked for the investigation in the first place. At that point, it's up to the federal security officer at the agency of hire to determine your eligibility to have a position with access to secure information. You may get the chance to explain or refute negative or unclear information during this "adjudication phase." Then your clearance is either granted or denied.

If it's granted, the fun doesn't stop there. Depending on what level of clearance you have, you'll have to undergo reinvestigation every five, 10 or 15 years. If you leave that position, the clearance is still active, but it may not be usable by your next employer depending on what type of security clearance the new job requires. Let enough time pass and the clearance will have no merit at all. The next time around you'll have to start at the beginning again. You can't simply request a renewal of your security clearance. You have to be employed in a position in which it's required.

The whole process of obtaining a clearance can take many months -- sometimes longer than a year -- and cost several thousands (even tens of thousands) of dollars. The more sensitive the job, the deeper -- and the costlier and more time-consuming -- the investigation. You can't speed up the effort, nor can you offer to pay the cost. That's why so many jobs listing security clearance as a requirement are anxious to find candidates who already possess a clearance of the right type -- the project may be over by the time somebody new to the process obtains his or her clearance. If you've noticed the propensity of government contractors to intensely recruit ex-military people for open positions, it's because vets frequently come with the security clearance that's needed as part of their portfolio.

Recruiting firms, attorneys or other companies that promise for a fee to obtain a security clearance for you or "pre-approve" you for a security clearance are scams. Don't fall for their antics.

If you don't already have a security clearance but there's a particular organization you're determined to work for, your best approach is to obtain employment that doesn't require the clearance with the agency or firm. Then put in your time and make it clear to your manager that should the right opportunity present itself, you'd be willing to undergo the investigation. But temper your enthusiasm. Too much eagerness to undergo this in-depth exploration into your personal and professional life might be viewed as suspicious behavior.

Originally published in Dec. 2003 as part of "CertCities.com's Security Certificaiton Resource Guide," available for download (PDF format) here.


Dian Schaffhauser is the editorial director of Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine, CertCities.com, TCPMag.com and ENTmag.com. She can be reached at .

There are 67 CertCities.com user Comments for “About Those U.S. Government Security Clearances...”
Page 3 of 7
4/5/04: Decipher says: Go ahead, don't do it. That's fine by me because it means job security. Just don't come over this same media complaining about outsourcing and lack of jobs! Decipher
4/7/04: big mo says: Im not sure if this is true of not, but If you have a clean record, but relatives close to you have serious felonies, debt and/or drug problems. you are guilty by association(sort of) and will be denied clearance. Is there anyway to clear that up if its true? or are you doomed by having the same genes as a moron.
4/7/04: Decipher says: No, you're not doomed. It's not your criminal record and as long as you never co-signed within their indebtedness then you're not in debt. Family is only one group of people that the investigators will confide in to find out about your background. Decipher
4/8/04: big mo says: Thanks Decipher. That clears it up for me.
4/14/04: Anonymous says: to Terry Garbo (3/10/04) It's E-QIP (no "U") and the URL is http://www.opm.gov/e-qip/reference.asp
4/15/04: Anonymous from Washington, DC says: I have a question - let's say someone applies for security clearance - I read in these comments somewhere that the information is not protected. Is that just in the context of the job, or do future employeers (non-government) have access to this information? How freely is my life history going to be distributed? Like others above, life hasn't been perfect, but if I am deemed not-worthy I don't want to dig myself into a whole where I have to begin yet again. Comments?
4/15/04: Former Radar OReilly type says: One thing my 15 years in the military taught me is that there is a lot of misinformation, conjecture, and mythology surrounding security clearances (even among those that have them). In my experience the biggest (and quickest) thing that will cause a disapproval is lying on the application about anything, and this includes leaving things out (shy of very minor oversights). Someone with a criminal record who is honest about it has a better chance of approval then someone who does not but “forgets” to mention their 1-month vacation to a country unfriendly to the US. Something that may help answer people's questions about things that may count against them, etc is to reference the actual document used to make such determinations - look at the "Adjudicator Guidelines" (http://www.dss.mil/nf/adr) at the Defense Security Service" web site. Fortunately or unfortunately (depending on our point of view), as you will see in the document, it is not a cut and dry formula or “point” system. Things are looked at in context. As it states in the second section of the document “Each case must be judged on its own merits, and final determination remains the responsibility of the specific department or agency.” Since the applications are reviewed by individuals, and individuals vary, the same application that is disapproved by one person may get approved by other persons. Therefore, if you have some past blemishes, the best thing you can do is to be upfront about them, and continue to do things right. Also some great information is available on the subject of getting a security clearance at this web site: http://www.taonline.com/securityclearances/scdetails.asp The site ("Transition Assistance Online") is geared towards military personnel transitioning back to civilian life, but the information is still valuable and accurate.
4/17/04: an observer says: I have recently discovered something that may be of interest to those who are intereested in possibly being granted a security clearance. A former Chief Research Psychologist in one of the USA's largest intelligence agencies, a few years ago, developed a short psychological type test that he has titled as the Personnel Security Standards Psychological Questionnaire (PSSPQ). The PSSPQ was developed to accurately predict whether an individual would eventually (following al the required processing and adjudications) be successful or not in being granted high-level security clearance status. Information regarding the PSSPQ can be found at: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~lastone2/psspq.html h
4/19/04: K.C. Sunil kumar from India says: I have offered some job opportunities in Florida which require Background Check or Social Security clearance certificate. I am an Indian, residing in India presently. Please clarify if I require Background check or TS SCI clearance. If require, how can I go about it? Please advise.
4/19/04: reformed from cali says: I have 3 misdemeanors of petty theft in the past. What is the likelihood of me getting any security clearance for a teaching credential or a CCNA credential? Anyone, please advise to my email address. Thanks.
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “About Those U.S. Government Security Clearances...”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

top

Sponsored Links:
$10,000 MCSE/CISCO Scholarship: offered to top techs throughout the US!
LAN/WAN Consultant Placement Camp: Guaranteed to get you eng/consulting gigs!
Free Authorized Cisco eLearning: from Global Knowledge
Adapting to Change - Blade Systems Move into the Mainstream:: Free White Paper
Attaining Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance: Free White Paper
Subscribe to Redmond magazine: It’s free and available in print or PDF!
Fresh Cisco White Papers: Get them now on TCPmag.com
MCSE Track, Free Study Guides, Trusted Speakers: TechMentor Orlando
IT certification news delivered weekly: Subscribe Today!




Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Industry Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | ENTmag.com | MCPmag.com | TCPmag.com | TechMentor Conferences | 101communications | Privacy Policy
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute | E-Gov | ENT News
Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | IT Compliance Institute | JavaSPEKTRUM | MCP TechMentor Conferences
MCPmag.com | OBJEKTspektrum | Recharger | Redmond magazine | SIGS-DATACOM | TCPmag.com
Copyright 1996-2005 101communications. See our Privacy Policy.
101communications