CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Check Out the 10 Hottest Certifications for 2005!
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: Secrets of the Windows Gurus

Reader Review: Word 2007 -- Not Exactly a Must-Have

Access Anywhere

Windows Vista: Learning To Play Nice

Product Review: WhatsUp Gold 11.0, Premium Edition


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



Visit Redmond Media Group
 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Exam Reviews ..Exam Review Article Tuesday: October 16, 2007
TechBusiness: Resources for Innovation Through Software Technology on Redmond Developer News
Dice: The Career Hub for Tech Insiders



Access 2000 Core Exam
Is Access 2000 really the big, bad wolf of the MOUS 2000 core exams? Not if you know your stuff.


by Faithe Wempen

5/4/2001 -- When I went in to take this exam, the testing center manager warned me, "This is the hardest test of all the MOUS exams." Talk about intimidating words! But I didn't find this test particularly difficult or tricky, and users with a good grasp of Access shouldn't have any problem passing.

Reviewer's Rating: "Straightforward and fair; no tricks. Users with a good grasp of Access shouldn't have any problem passing."
Exam Title: Microsoft Access 2000
Number of Questions: Approximately 30, some multi-part.
Time Allowed: 45 minutes.
Objectives: http://www.mous.net/tests/access2000_core.htm
Cost: Varies per testing center.

Exam Details
Like all MOUS exams, this one is hands-on. It consists of about 30 directions that ask you to perform actions on a sample database, such as designing forms and reports, sorting and filtering records, and creating tables and queries. A typical question works like this: Access opens, and a data file loads, and a little on-screen box prompts you to perform a specific action or set of actions. You do as you're told, and then click Next to go on, or click Reset to restart the question.

The MOUS exams are graded by comparing your completed work for a given question to a solution file stored in the testing software. The closer your answer resembles that file, the more points you get. As you can imagine, the testing software required for such a scenario is fairly complex. Most testing centers have installed the test software on a reasonably fast PC, but if you happen to get a slow one, you might experience short delays between questions.

'You had better know Access pretty well, because you can count on losing at least five to 10 points through no fault of your own.'
Once you click Next, you can't return to the question, so make sure you've checked your work carefully before that point of no return. The test is not adaptive, however; it's the same test no matter how well or how poorly you perform on a particular question. (An adaptive exam is one in which the next question thrown at you depends on whether you got the previous one right or not.)

The score you receive is out of 1000 points, as with all MOUS 2000 exams. The minimum score required to pass varies with each exam; for the Access 2000 exam it is 790.

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

After the last question, you find out onscreen whether you passed. Before you leave the testing center, make sure they give you a printout showing your score and your percent correct for each skill category. That printout also contains a TRA number, which is your unique identifier for that test. You'll need that number if you plan to apply for a Microsoft program such as the MOUS Authorized Instructor program. Your official certificate will arrive from Microsoft in two to three weeks.

Skills Tested
There are nine skill sets covered on this exam; you'll find detailed information about them at the MOUS Web site under Exam Objectives (see link, above). They are:

  • Planning and designing databases. This tests your ability to plan a database intelligently -- to determine the fields and field types to use, to decide what information should go in a table, decide what types of reports you will need to create, and so on.
  • Working with Access. This tests basic program skills such as using the Help system, using the database window, printing, and navigating through records. It also covers creating new databases, both from scratch and with the Database Wizard.
  • Building and modifying tables. This tests your ability to create and format tables, set field sizes and properties, and add and delete fields. You should also know how to create lookups for fields and how to add input masks.
  • Building and modifying forms. Here you show your proficiency at creating forms using various methods. It includes both the Form Wizard and Design view methods, as well as adding fields and other controls to forms, formatting controls, and working with form sections such as headers and footers. You should also know how to place a calculated control on a form.
  • Viewing and organizing information. This section covers a lot of objectives. You should know how to use the Office Clipboard, how to switch between views, how to view data in a subdatasheet from a linked table, and how to enter information using both datasheets and forms. You should also study up on entering and editing records, finding and replacing data, and sorting and filtering. Queries also fall under this section. You will need to be able to create queries that draw from multiple tables, add calculated fields to queries, and specify filtering criteria in a query.
  • Defining relationships. This tests how well you can determine the need for relationships between tables, create those relationships, and modify/delete them. Make sure you understand the complex subject of referential integrity and the implications of the Cascade Update and Cascade Delete options.
  • Producing reports. This section lets you demonstrate your proficiency in generating various types of reports, including mailing labels. You should be comfortable adding, removing, and formatting fields, adding calculated fields, and working with report sections (headers, footers, etc.) ·
  • Integrating with other applications. This section covers transferring data into and out of Access. You should be able to swap data with Word tables and with Excel worksheets, and create a dynamic link between an Excel workbook sheet an an Access database. This section also covers Web skills such as creating a data access page, using the Hyperlink field type, and publishing a table or query as a Web page.
  • Using Access tools. This last section is a mish-mash of features, including printing database relationships, compacting and repairing database files, and backing up/restoring a database.

There are a lot of objectives for this exam, and they cover a lot of ground. I can't think of any major program feature that isn't at least touched on here. You'll need a solid, well-rounded understanding of Access (both from a user and a developer standpoint) in order to pass.

Preparation Tools
Since this is a hands-on exam, the best way to study for it is with materials that let you actually perform the skills you'll need to demonstrate. One of the best books in this regard is Learning Access 2000 by Rick Winter (DDC Publishing). It's a classroom workbook that can be used as a self-guided course or in an instructor-led environment equally well.

You'll find that most of the really thick books on Access will go further into the program than you probably care to venture. Using Access 2000 Special Edition (Que) and Microsoft Access 2000 Bible (IDG Books) are great reference volumes, but you'll probably use only the first half of one of these books to prepare for the exam.

Tricks, Tips and Traps
I have a lot of opinions about the effectiveness of the MOUS exams in measuring a person's actual skills. See my review of the Word 2000 Core exam if you want the full-blown soliloquy. Here's the short version, though.

The very nature of these tests makes grading errors inevitable. They're taking the electronic results from a human being's performance and comparing them to the results of another human being (the person at Microsoft who developed the question). Even though the system is sophisticated enough to make some allowances for minor variation, it's not perfect. Sometimes test-takers lose points in the scoring for things that are not their fault.

A classic case of this in the Word exam is that if the directions say to select something and make it bold, and you don't deselect it before you click Next, you'll get a deduction because the answer file does not have anything selected and you do. I'm sure such annoyances exist in the Access exam too, although the administrator I talked with at the test center wasn't aware of any specifics.

So what does this mean to you? Well, for one thing, it means you had better know Access pretty well, because you can count on losing at least five to 10 points through no fault of your own due to these nit-picky little differences. You need a score of 790 to pass (out of 1000), which is higher than for most of the other MOUS exams. Luckily, Access is less prone to grading error than Word, for example, since in Access you work more with cells and objects in well-defined lists and grids. It also means that you should make as few stray changes as possible to the data file for each question. If you need to poke around and figure something out, click Reset to start the question over again and then make a beeline to the correct answer on the fresh copy.

The other key to passing this test is reading comprehension. You must read the questions very carefully, and make sure you understand what is expected of you before you dive into the question. It's all too easy to overlook a "not" in a sentence like "Select all the records in which the City field does not equal London."

This is a very thorough exam, requiring knowledge of all the major components in Access. However, that said, most of the questions are fair and straightforward, with very little tricky wording, and the test grading mechanism, while not perfect, is as good as can be expected.

Have you taken this exam? Was your experience similar to Faithe's? Post your comments below and share your experience with your peers.


Faithe Wempen, M.A.,is a Microsoft Office Specialist Master Instructor and an instructor in the Computer Technology Department of Indiana University/Purdue University at Indianapolis. She is the author of over 50 books on computer hardware and software, including A+ Jumpstart: PC Hardware and Operating System Basics. She also co-owns the Sycamore Knoll Bed and Breakfast.

More articles by Faithe Wempen:


There are 67 CertCities.com user Comments for “Access 2000 Core Exam”
The current user rating is: two stars - somewhat challeging
Page 2 of 7
5/25/01: Fiona says:
three stars - difficult, but manageable
I used Learnkey part one and combining that with a book from which I looked up the exam objectives not covered by LearnKey, I managed to pass. Three weeks prior I had never used Access in my life. It isnt hard, you just need to study for it, and understand what you are doing. I was surprised that I passed, I expected to fail, but in the end found it relatively simple. As for the person who stated that people can call themselve "Experts" after taking this exam, I would say that I know how to build and navigate a very basic database. I am by NO MEANS an expert. Anyone who thinks themself such will quickly be found out - believe me.
5/26/01: steve UK says:
three stars - difficult, but manageable
I to thought i did very well in this exam but i just scraped in with a score of 804 which took me by supprise, so watch out!! cross those "T's" dot them "I's and good luck.
6/5/01: Dan says:
one star - cakewalk
This Access 2000 test was very easy, especially when you compare it to the Access 97 Expert exam. Since I knew that this was not going to be an Expert test, I didn't even study for the test and still did very well. If you've been teaching this course for a while (at least Intro - Interm levels), you should do well. There really weren't any major Advanced questions. If you're a TRUE EXPERT than this test is a "Piece of Cake"!
6/7/01: Mark says:
five stars - true gurus only
What study guides can anyone recommend? I have Cheat Sheets for Access. Any other suggestions?
6/21/01: Mighty says:
one star - cakewalk
I did the Access exam over a year ago and found it was a joke (even though it crashed on me 3 times and I lost the points from those questions). Correctly revealing a sub-datasheet in Table view does not a Master make. You want a tough desktop exam - try the Project 2000 exam. It's 1 hour, 31 questions (most with 2-3 unrelated 'steps') and 2 multiple choice. That exam is the KING of MOUS exams.
6/22/01: Jan-Willem says:
five stars - true gurus only
I am (and many more poeple are) color-blind and encountered a problem with one of the questions where I had to apply a format. The test did not show the names of the colors in the grid of colors.
6/22/01: Anonymous says:
one star - cakewalk
The Access 97 exam was challenging. Access 2000 was a joke. Many of te interesting and useful features of Access were not covered.
6/22/01: Mighty says:
five stars - true gurus only
Jan: Anybody who is used to Office and wants to be considered an 'Expert' or 'Master' should know their color palette inside out. This is basic stuff people!
6/22/01: Mighty says:
one star - cakewalk
Jan: Anybody who is used to Office and wants to be considered an 'Expert' or 'Master' should know their color palette inside out. This is basic stuff people!
6/25/01: Lou says:
one star - cakewalk
This test was a very easy one. I don't even know how someone would hire you with such a low level of knowledge.
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page

Exam Difficulty Rating Key
five stars - true gurus only true gurus only
four stars - very difficult very difficult
three stars - difficult, but manageable difficult, but manageable
two stars - somewhat challeging somewhat challeging
one star - cakewalk cakewalk
Your comment about: “Access 2000 Core Exam”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   
top


Sponsored Links
Worried that your files and data are not safe and secure?
FREE trial of WS_FTP Server with SSH – Secure File Transfer
Exchange Email Retention and eDiscovery Best Practices
Live Webcast, October 17, Register Today!
Access your Future through Citrix Education
Obtain some of the industry’s hottest certifications
Already Microsoft, Sun, CompTIA, or Cisco certified.
Turn it into a bachelor's degree...fast!
Get 25% Off Certification Practice Exams
Introductory offer at SybexTestsuccess.com through November
Free Microsoft, Cisco, CompTIA Exam Prep
Click Now to Download!
Capella U. IT career with a degree online.
Click here to learn about our many specializations
Get 20% off Self Test Software Cert Prep Tools
Practice tests, study guides and eLearning help you Pass the Test
Get 20% off Legendary Transcender Practice Exams
Cert prep products for Vista, SQL 2005 and NET 2.0 are here.



Home | Microsoft® | Cisco® | Oracle® | A+/Network+" | Linux/Unix | MOS | Security | List of Certs
Advertise | Contact Us | Contributors | Features | Forums | News | Pop Quiz | Tips | Press Releases | RSS Feeds RSS Feeds from CertCities.com
Search | Site Map | Redmond Media Group | TechMentor Conferences | Tech Library Webcasts
This Web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., The Computing Technology Industry Association, Linus Torvolds, or any other certification or technology vendor. Cisco® and Cisco Systems® are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. Oracle® is a registered trademark of Oracle Corp. A+®, i-Net+T, Network+T, and Server+T are trademarks and registered trademarks of The Computing Technology Industry Association. (CompTIA). LinuxT is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Reprints allowed with written permission from the publisher. For more information, e-mail
Application Development Trends | Campus Technology | CertCities.com | The Data Warehousing Institute
E-Gov | EduHound | ENTmag.com | Enterprise Systems | Federal Computer Week | FTPOnline.com | Government Health IT
IT Compliance Institute | MCPmag.com | Recharger | Redmond Developer News | Redmond
Redmond Channel Partner | TCPmag.com | T.H.E. Journal | TechMentor Conferences | Visual Studio Magazine | VSLive!
Copyright 1996-2007 1105 Media, Inc. See our Privacy Policy.
1105 Redmond Media Group