CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Post Your Mind in the CertCities.com Forums Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Columns ..Column Story Tuesday: December 28, 2010


 Certification Advisor  
Greg Neilson
Greg Neilson


 MCSD, MCAD and You
Greg offers his two cents on the new developer certifications from Microsoft.
by Greg Neilson  
3/12/2002 -- Now that Microsoft has fleshed out the details of its new developer certifications, it's a good time to look into what exactly these titles offer. As I've commented before, Microsoft's developer certification program hasn't exploded the way the company's networking titles have – as ofJanuary 2, there were only 28,813 MCSDs, as compared to 436,599 MCSEs. It will be very interesting to see what impact these new certifications will have on these numbers.

As foreshadowed late last year, there are now two levels of developer certification – the MCSD for Microsoft .NET and the new MCAD (Microsoft Certified Application Developer), also for .NET. The new MCSD consists of five exams (it used to be four), and the MCAD has three exams -- a subset of those offered for the MCSD. Microsoft suggests that the MCSD is for lead developers who work on enterprise solutions, whereas the MCAD is aimed developers who work on department-level solutions. The additional core exam for MCSDs focuses on developing XML Web services with either Visual Basic .NET or Visual C# .NET. The MCAD doesn't have the MCSD requirement for a solution architecture exam, and has only one of the Web application development or Windows application development exams, the XML web services exam and an elective.

Most of the exams for these titles will beta in April and go live in June. However, the new 70-300 (Analyzing Requirements and Defining .NET Solution Architectures), a core exam for MCSD .NET, isn't expected until early next year. I can appreciate the need to get this new 70-300 exam designed correctly, but I'm a little surprised to hear it will take Microsoft nearly another year to have this ready -- in IT terms, that's a long time away.

The new .NET framework, together with the new C# language and/or Visual Basic .NET, represents a huge learning curve for existing developers who were already competent with Visual C++ and/or Visual Basic -- not unlike the gap the networking community faced earlier with Windows 2000 and the MCSE program. Therefore, I expect that many existing MCSDs have much to learn to master these new technologies. At the same time, I'm perplexed that there's no upgrade path for existing MCSDs; although their current MCSD won't expire, they'll need to take all five exams in order to achieve the new version of the title. Even most of the old MCSD electives are no longer valid. Why didn't Microsoft follow the same policy used with the MCSE and allowed expired electives to be used as part of the current certifications? Surely not everything that MCSDs have known about programming on the Windows platform is now obsolete! At the very least, Microsoft could give current MCSDs a couple of free exam vouchers to be applied to the new exams. Given how serious Microsoft is about the all-pervasive nature of .NET -- with TV adverts and all -- it's good business to have more expert .NET evangelists who can spread the word.

The new MCSD for .NET program presents an issue for those currently considering or working the MCSD. Given that there is no upgrade path for the "old" MCSD to the new, it's hard to make a case for continuing on with the old program. Even so, the exams won't be live until June, meaning there probably won't be much in the way of exam resources until 4th quarter 2002. Because there is so much to learn, getting deep into it now is a great idea. Of course, there's nothing saying you need to use self-study resources anyway to prepare for exams: In the past, I've used product knowledge combined with the online manuals and, of course, the objectives to prepare for exams. Although this is a longer process than following a self-study book, I've found it to be an excellent way to learn lots about the topic AND pass the exams.

If you plan to get this certification, I recommend you get moving ASAP. Sure, everyone who develops on Microsoft platforms will need to get a grasp of this material eventually, but by becoming an early adopter and, hopefully, an expert with these technologies, you could use that knowledge to really further your career. The bottom line? The sooner you master working with Visual Studio .NET, the better.

What you do think about these new certifications? Are you planning to complete one of them? Let me know by posting your comments below.


Greg Neilson, MCSE+Internet, MCNE, PCLP, is a Contributing Editor for Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine and a manager at a large IT services firm in Australia. He's the author of Lotus Domino Administration in a Nutshell (O'Reilly and Associates, ISBN 1-56592-717-6). You can reach him at Attn: Greg.

 


More articles by Greg Neilson:

-- advertisement --


There are 22 CertCities.com user Comments for “MCSD, MCAD and You”
Page 2 of 3
3/23/02: Roger says: Michael What do you mean by an individual being 2nd fiddle by doing the Microsoft Office User Specialist certifications?
3/24/02: Anonymous says: Boo hoo! Microsoft doesn't pay attention to me! Boo hoo!
3/27/02: meera says: Can someone tell me if the book suggested for Exam 70-306 (Windows Application Development) 'Upgrading Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 to Visual Basic .NET' alone is enough if you are planning on giving the certification ? Is there any other material available ?
3/28/02: Zunig Hexapod says: HELP! Red velevet mushrooms are attacking the lemon orchards!!
3/31/02: Paul says: I opened my latest and greatest VB app (the one that even does the dishes) in the VB.Net upgrade wizard. After a quick scan I closed the window and decided it was once again time to reinvent myself. Having been in our industry for 20+ years this is nothing new but it is becoming more frequent as technology evolves every day. My point is that an upgrade path for MCSD .Net is like offering an upgrade path to Java. They're apples and oranges and (like Jeff said) it would be in the best interest of your career (as well as the certification's credibility) to really learn the stuff and forget about any quick cure. Even so, I perceive the certification to be a tie-breaker of sorts when all other things are equal. Certification says I am "proficient", not a deity, and we each have our levels of proficiency. It is up to you as the job candidate to demonstrate this profiency but it is by no means the sole reason I would pay you the big bucks. I am a "technical" team leader and that means I interact with the customer (soft/schmoozing skills), I do performance reviews (management skills), I train the hot-dog college kids (interpersonal skills but in this case I call it "tough love") and I even tell the IT people how to fix their problems (I take medication for this one). The point of this diatribe is that I am glad that there is no upgrade path and it is really not Microsoft's problem as to how you market that certification. It is up to you to walk-the-walk if you're gonna talk-the-talk.
4/1/02: Anonymous says: I believe MS MCSD .NET has its good and bad points at this stage. I have read from the MCSD FAQ that VC++ .NET would be included later and as for ASP.NET, it's pretty much in the web service/ XML part of the exam. Also do anyone know what happen to FoxPro in .NET? I know once there was FoxPro 7 before .NET came out, even though I'm not a fan of FoxPro. Do you guys thing whether VJ# is really worth it in the .NET platform, given XP said to have no Java support, and Sun pretty much dominates the Java language?
4/3/02: David O. says: I am just strating the old MCSD certificaton. Can anyone offer any good tips for the exams. I have taken the MOUS exams, but have heard that they are nothing like them. Also what are the main benefits of gaining the MCSD qualification?
4/18/02: Heidi C says: David O. My advise is start with 70-229 because it well transfer to the new. Then study for both langage tests together. (IF VB thats 70-175, 70-176) and level 70-100 till last it is an overview and you need all the above to really understand it. Hope that helps.
5/11/02: David O says: So the exams that are for the old MCSD, are not being replaced by the new one. I will still be able to take the old exams?
5/4/06: Nilay Das from INDIA says: I am also really surprised about the course content of 70-300. I have passed mcsd.net in (vb.net/vc#.net). still continuing with 70-300
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “MCSD, MCAD and You”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top